From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D2B67EEE6 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 13:16:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708953415; cv=none; b=joMXnCn4fiB+YhjTq6huBNnPWJPMX8Cr8AKgIDX5ke9PcRNmPzPKDClKEatDRoySm0dGkijyFjrhcP+tPjpUBCwNVQ8Nr5Vg2XvKgoEayx7NHCsa28mb8gVlBpHV5NGh5UJuSkQUS3odwQ5UKxXE3aP9SWZo9JCB5h1oJunr/is= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708953415; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1vO1dAi+EoUTRIxUQv54xnsRj5TDUFErd6CjZk/aZOk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=hn5pgnRsgEBlWsEdeIGZniZndxkaTguRUKRJ72O+DrfgV1hk470XGmvD29eNsMmZBQ/Zoo/yj4k6bgQdxR0HYMMjkPs35klJR3WAmIweLzxsGAguT15G/+jsidOznv/4Q++WeO6CMZTBLKabatmoaxcJ+zb8dKMzCXkJ9F0lTbQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=JDUG+fLI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="JDUG+fLI" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=1vO1dAi+EoUTRIxUQv54xnsRj5TDUFErd6CjZk/aZOk=; b=JDUG+fLINH+jpZ7FWk+O3sH/Dm a1REE/SHPym9PSCcLJ+zrSL8OyLRBEBSIsOd0t9xbCKXH64c9DpBsbfO7D0HsZrUxQR4Z2UlmpfXI E1Mb58Nig+zEaT7KvawDLTqDqc3nbEgwpOs7OagDiux+xVK0xgstPku8Fz/iuFwsA3qM759I1L+Gn bAuumbdzddRsPReRCtR5LE9YtRUhw48W08CrWFUdRmeBSqgL0WAZJXk/ojRhj91OdYG3IcPlFesWy A+I53lCS/s9M/WXnq8XBA0V7I3FewNifc/jGMMruCxgesQvqxEmc8/AJFFRQ1ZC6v9x0WuTAAabYR wC3fpMfQ==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1reaqc-0000000HDxg-18kl; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 13:16:46 +0000 Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 13:16:46 +0000 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Yafang Shao Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, shakeelb@google.com, muchun.song@linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: Add reclaim type to memory.reclaim Message-ID: References: <20240225114204.50459-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 08:34:07PM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote: > Additionally, since this patch offers a straightforward solution to > address the issue in container environments, would it be feasible to > apply this patch initially? There are lot sof other problems with this patch, but since I disagree with the idea of this patch, I didn't enumerate them.