From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA67C3D0A8; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:50:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.135.223.131 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710514203; cv=none; b=egzq370k3kC3CUB/ZsiApqeIdiq6x5FgBQB7YuXkUbsC7rphOmHv++8pUnss637QVT6M1xCb6C1YWnvA11ix/qwoC84ugLj67uVDVktIaEYG4LmTiNjk7vygjJxxqhFEyLpEcx4Za1SlH4B/onqJGsKCjEUZYZmdNcPnmEJDUSE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710514203; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pYIocXJzjWQXvaE5A/LvqKx5ijceUidPNLC97XcDslg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=atV7tPYvsb6xWhI3gaiK55yQXLcIjAaC0Q9F9vVh5p2DoOfQS9i6/HUOU7M7lWWz4n84CXrQTSpylYz01UXDC4GSE4UIS+WUXYmQiv50qGoOoIigfawzNtqqm/xHpuiZhQiInDFSotfsjbHoIZL7j3Fn4tCpytQ8f9Ss+T3h8pE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b=Ahxv7uPn; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b=5q/3pwV4; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b=Ahxv7uPn; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b=5q/3pwV4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.135.223.131 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b="Ahxv7uPn"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b="5q/3pwV4"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b="Ahxv7uPn"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b="5q/3pwV4" Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C9EA1FB6F; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:50:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1710514200; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qLns1K/O2DnblFDDOvNNQmCKnW+xm16WB3FqmaAZOVw=; b=Ahxv7uPn0yHUyjnSVGswZtpTD96N/M1Eq5D5oxrO5ZNIc5mCRwUV+uESmU/nnpRJCfJ4QM D/efYwLiIy+ILug7JgYGYHAap4jkfBrvbQu7BDat0RZC3Ewd7P3GLPFbgWyrfWkKtusRXj e6AkBS3oa4Wepby39OGTr/BFbC7Sxjo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1710514200; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qLns1K/O2DnblFDDOvNNQmCKnW+xm16WB3FqmaAZOVw=; b=5q/3pwV4Nxs9UtGYE/cVhuZn7fFOdVV5nFHgAsTWRJrxUEnC5aqZaLP20X9Av2BuDSfSAp QF9M5g13ybobxfCg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1710514200; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qLns1K/O2DnblFDDOvNNQmCKnW+xm16WB3FqmaAZOVw=; b=Ahxv7uPn0yHUyjnSVGswZtpTD96N/M1Eq5D5oxrO5ZNIc5mCRwUV+uESmU/nnpRJCfJ4QM D/efYwLiIy+ILug7JgYGYHAap4jkfBrvbQu7BDat0RZC3Ewd7P3GLPFbgWyrfWkKtusRXj e6AkBS3oa4Wepby39OGTr/BFbC7Sxjo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1710514200; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qLns1K/O2DnblFDDOvNNQmCKnW+xm16WB3FqmaAZOVw=; b=5q/3pwV4Nxs9UtGYE/cVhuZn7fFOdVV5nFHgAsTWRJrxUEnC5aqZaLP20X9Av2BuDSfSAp QF9M5g13ybobxfCg== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0930913931; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:50:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id GsQAARhg9GVGRgAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:50:00 +0000 Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:49:03 +0100 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Christian Brauner Cc: kernel test robot , oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, lkp@intel.com, ltp@lists.linux.it, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [LTP] [linus:master] [pidfd] cb12fd8e0d: ltp.readahead01.fail Message-ID: References: <202403151507.5540b773-oliver.sang@intel.com> <20240315-neufahrzeuge-kennt-317f2a903605@brauner> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240315-neufahrzeuge-kennt-317f2a903605@brauner> X-Spam-Level: Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=Ahxv7uPn; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b="5q/3pwV4" X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.76 / 50.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; RCPT_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[7]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:dkim,suse.cz:email]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-0.75)[84.05%] X-Spam-Score: -1.76 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 2C9EA1FB6F X-Spam-Flag: NO Hi! > So I'd just remove that test. It's meaningless for pseudo fses. Wouldn't it make more sense to actually return EINVAL instead of ignoring the request if readahead() is not implemented? -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz