From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs: Set file_handle::handle_bytes before referencing file_handle::f_handle
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 22:29:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zg8brYRFHlS1qaJC@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240404211212.it.297-kees@kernel.org>
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 02:12:15PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Since __counted_by(handle_bytes) was added to struct file_handle, we need
> to explicitly set it in the one place it wasn't yet happening prior to
> accessing the flex array "f_handle". For robustness also check for a
> negative value for handle_bytes, which is possible for an "int", but
> nothing appears to set.
Why not change handle_bytes from an int to a u32?
Also, what a grotty function.
handle_dwords = f_handle.handle_bytes >> 2;
...
handle_bytes = handle_dwords * sizeof(u32);
> Fixes: 1b43c4629756 ("fs: Annotate struct file_handle with __counted_by() and use struct_size()")
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
> v2: more bounds checking, add comments, dropped reviews since logic changed
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240403215358.work.365-kees@kernel.org/
> ---
> fs/fhandle.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fhandle.c b/fs/fhandle.c
> index 8a7f86c2139a..854f866eaad2 100644
> --- a/fs/fhandle.c
> +++ b/fs/fhandle.c
> @@ -40,6 +40,11 @@ static long do_sys_name_to_handle(const struct path *path,
> GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!handle)
> return -ENOMEM;
> + /*
> + * Since handle->f_handle is about to be written, make sure the
> + * associated __counted_by(handle_bytes) variable is correct.
> + */
> + handle->handle_bytes = f_handle.handle_bytes;
>
> /* convert handle size to multiple of sizeof(u32) */
> handle_dwords = f_handle.handle_bytes >> 2;
> @@ -51,8 +56,8 @@ static long do_sys_name_to_handle(const struct path *path,
> handle->handle_type = retval;
> /* convert handle size to bytes */
> handle_bytes = handle_dwords * sizeof(u32);
> - handle->handle_bytes = handle_bytes;
> - if ((handle->handle_bytes > f_handle.handle_bytes) ||
> + /* check if handle_bytes would have exceeded the allocation */
> + if ((handle_bytes < 0) || (handle_bytes > f_handle.handle_bytes) ||
> (retval == FILEID_INVALID) || (retval < 0)) {
> /* As per old exportfs_encode_fh documentation
> * we could return ENOSPC to indicate overflow
> @@ -68,6 +73,8 @@ static long do_sys_name_to_handle(const struct path *path,
> handle_bytes = 0;
> } else
> retval = 0;
> + /* the "valid" number of bytes may fewer than originally allocated */
> + handle->handle_bytes = handle_bytes;
> /* copy the mount id */
> if (put_user(real_mount(path->mnt)->mnt_id, mnt_id) ||
> copy_to_user(ufh, handle,
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-04 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-04 21:12 [PATCH v2] fs: Set file_handle::handle_bytes before referencing file_handle::f_handle Kees Cook
2024-04-04 21:29 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2024-04-05 10:21 ` Jan Kara
2024-04-05 15:36 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zg8brYRFHlS1qaJC@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox