public inbox for linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs: Set file_handle::handle_bytes before referencing file_handle::f_handle
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 22:29:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zg8brYRFHlS1qaJC@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240404211212.it.297-kees@kernel.org>

On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 02:12:15PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Since __counted_by(handle_bytes) was added to struct file_handle, we need
> to explicitly set it in the one place it wasn't yet happening prior to
> accessing the flex array "f_handle". For robustness also check for a
> negative value for handle_bytes, which is possible for an "int", but
> nothing appears to set.

Why not change handle_bytes from an int to a u32?

Also, what a grotty function.

        handle_dwords = f_handle.handle_bytes >> 2;
...
        handle_bytes = handle_dwords * sizeof(u32);

> Fixes: 1b43c4629756 ("fs: Annotate struct file_handle with __counted_by() and use struct_size()")
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
>  v2: more bounds checking, add comments, dropped reviews since logic changed
>  v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240403215358.work.365-kees@kernel.org/
> ---
>  fs/fhandle.c | 11 +++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/fhandle.c b/fs/fhandle.c
> index 8a7f86c2139a..854f866eaad2 100644
> --- a/fs/fhandle.c
> +++ b/fs/fhandle.c
> @@ -40,6 +40,11 @@ static long do_sys_name_to_handle(const struct path *path,
>  			 GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!handle)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> +	/*
> +	 * Since handle->f_handle is about to be written, make sure the
> +	 * associated __counted_by(handle_bytes) variable is correct.
> +	 */
> +	handle->handle_bytes = f_handle.handle_bytes;
>  
>  	/* convert handle size to multiple of sizeof(u32) */
>  	handle_dwords = f_handle.handle_bytes >> 2;
> @@ -51,8 +56,8 @@ static long do_sys_name_to_handle(const struct path *path,
>  	handle->handle_type = retval;
>  	/* convert handle size to bytes */
>  	handle_bytes = handle_dwords * sizeof(u32);
> -	handle->handle_bytes = handle_bytes;
> -	if ((handle->handle_bytes > f_handle.handle_bytes) ||
> +	/* check if handle_bytes would have exceeded the allocation */
> +	if ((handle_bytes < 0) || (handle_bytes > f_handle.handle_bytes) ||
>  	    (retval == FILEID_INVALID) || (retval < 0)) {
>  		/* As per old exportfs_encode_fh documentation
>  		 * we could return ENOSPC to indicate overflow
> @@ -68,6 +73,8 @@ static long do_sys_name_to_handle(const struct path *path,
>  		handle_bytes = 0;
>  	} else
>  		retval = 0;
> +	/* the "valid" number of bytes may fewer than originally allocated */
> +	handle->handle_bytes = handle_bytes;
>  	/* copy the mount id */
>  	if (put_user(real_mount(path->mnt)->mnt_id, mnt_id) ||
>  	    copy_to_user(ufh, handle,
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-04 21:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-04 21:12 [PATCH v2] fs: Set file_handle::handle_bytes before referencing file_handle::f_handle Kees Cook
2024-04-04 21:29 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2024-04-05 10:21 ` Jan Kara
2024-04-05 15:36   ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zg8brYRFHlS1qaJC@casper.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox