From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>,
"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Andreas Dilger" <adilger@dilger.ca>,
"Al Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
"Ext4 Developers List" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor@kernel.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
"Anders Roxell" <anders.roxell@linaro.org>,
"Alexandre Ghiti" <alex@ghiti.fr>
Subject: Re: riscv32 EXT4 splat, 6.8 regression?
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 19:31:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zh6n-nvnQbL-0xss@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240416181944.23af44ee@namcao>
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 06:19:44PM +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> On 2024-04-16 Björn Töpel wrote:
> > Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> writes:
> >
> > > Fixed version:
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> > > index fa34cf55037b..af4192bc51d0 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> > > @@ -245,6 +245,7 @@ static void __init setup_bootmem(void)
> > > * be done as soon as the kernel mapping base address is determined.
> > > */
> > > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT)) {
> > > + memblock_reserve(__pa(-PAGE_SIZE), PAGE_SIZE);
> > > max_mapped_addr = __pa(~(ulong)0);
> > > if (max_mapped_addr == (phys_ram_end - 1))
> > > memblock_set_current_limit(max_mapped_addr - 4096);
> >
> > Nice!
> >
> > Can't we get rid of the if-statement, and max_mapped_address as well?
>
> I don't see why not :D
>
> Best regards,
> Nam
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> index fa34cf55037b..f600cfee0aef 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> @@ -197,7 +197,6 @@ early_param("mem", early_mem);
> static void __init setup_bootmem(void)
> {
> phys_addr_t vmlinux_end = __pa_symbol(&_end);
> - phys_addr_t max_mapped_addr;
> phys_addr_t phys_ram_end, vmlinux_start;
>
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL))
> @@ -238,17 +237,9 @@ static void __init setup_bootmem(void)
> /*
> * memblock allocator is not aware of the fact that last 4K bytes of
> * the addressable memory can not be mapped because of IS_ERR_VALUE
> - * macro. Make sure that last 4k bytes are not usable by memblock
> - * if end of dram is equal to maximum addressable memory. For 64-bit
> - * kernel, this problem can't happen here as the end of the virtual
> - * address space is occupied by the kernel mapping then this check must
> - * be done as soon as the kernel mapping base address is determined.
> + * macro. Make sure that last 4k bytes are not usable by memblock.
> */
It's not only memblock, but buddy as well, so maybe
/*
* The last 4K bytes of the addressable memory can not be used
* because of IS_ERR_VALUE macro. Make sure that last 4K bytes are
* not usable by kernel memory allocators.
*/
> - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT)) {
> - max_mapped_addr = __pa(~(ulong)0);
> - if (max_mapped_addr == (phys_ram_end - 1))
> - memblock_set_current_limit(max_mapped_addr - 4096);
> - }
> + memblock_reserve(__pa(-PAGE_SIZE), PAGE_SIZE);
Ack.
> min_low_pfn = PFN_UP(phys_ram_base);
> max_low_pfn = max_pfn = PFN_DOWN(phys_ram_end);
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-16 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-12 14:57 riscv32 EXT4 splat, 6.8 regression? Björn Töpel
2024-04-12 15:43 ` Theodore Ts'o
2024-04-12 16:59 ` Björn Töpel
2024-04-13 4:35 ` Theodore Ts'o
2024-04-13 10:01 ` Conor Dooley
2024-04-13 14:43 ` Nam Cao
2024-04-14 0:24 ` Theodore Ts'o
2024-04-14 1:46 ` Andreas Dilger
2024-04-14 2:04 ` Theodore Ts'o
2024-04-14 2:18 ` Al Viro
2024-04-14 2:15 ` Al Viro
2024-04-14 4:16 ` Andreas Dilger
2024-04-14 14:08 ` Björn Töpel
2024-04-15 13:04 ` Christian Brauner
2024-04-15 16:04 ` Björn Töpel
2024-04-16 6:44 ` Nam Cao
2024-04-16 8:25 ` Christian Brauner
2024-04-16 11:02 ` Björn Töpel
2024-04-16 14:24 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-16 15:17 ` Nam Cao
2024-04-16 15:30 ` Nam Cao
2024-04-16 15:56 ` Björn Töpel
2024-04-16 16:19 ` Nam Cao
2024-04-16 16:31 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2024-04-16 17:00 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-04-16 18:34 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-16 22:36 ` Nam Cao
2024-04-17 15:31 ` Theodore Ts'o
2024-04-17 18:06 ` Nam Cao
2024-04-17 19:34 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-17 22:09 ` Andreas Dilger
2024-04-18 9:17 ` Nam Cao
2024-04-16 18:05 ` Björn Töpel
2024-04-16 18:09 ` Nam Cao
2024-04-16 16:19 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-16 16:31 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-04-16 18:18 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zh6n-nvnQbL-0xss@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=anders.roxell@linaro.org \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=namcao@linutronix.de \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).