From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7121A7F; Wed, 1 May 2024 06:54:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714546473; cv=none; b=mDrw7qoqcoHyMrbuTjDe38lvX0EKxov6uynJrXG/jth49Aqy36pxqWGZnhDetBYtSSuBL6Eq0HPfcKFiJNVjP/QrLg/0TPUfEIGqxGp2eoEIHFRzyqSnUX/lj6JjGX2LE6RnvritoxsDfL+xDjRBek1uWZ854alx7T3YDAB3bp4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714546473; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Drt/KMy6/zX0sfw8Yc83NAUA/A2+mwDgsW7Fs6R5Gis=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=aHKLxIA1ybMgO7FvXv2o4ZYc81rntWJ0pYCd6A52R1n8lu29C+neLiCtwrdF1k9h0ZzBEgLdiyStFX14tJ6qkL0Ls5vROO+kwyI78L3jQ+FiyYMYwmnhvZeH6aEYXsSWGXAVBywG5BmKlzletLwBYGQ38XGnvWK5yTAWYcZBuN0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=1vzrBMl0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="1vzrBMl0" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=lGwwxT0mpwx7O2ptAVkArbeQHWRcI2b+SOB6soNI5D8=; b=1vzrBMl0mshoTMfA9elkeKTC/X amwEs4f0xuOAQbye7JieZAcKSLFPOfoTj30qUIneWNP/Y5pxs2R9x6PDp5Kad7G7GCi8ISkRdqOKs hTShce8Ql/inQfwrZyF0toGHzrzmkMpcqc6kjER6HS0xDEKXxwOC7m+3CBLREU2p0Uivr4E13x+NO WbA2EHMUCcAM5uRqgQM13+48dmaESpc343JBHCO5rt6zYLtq/nO4KqGN22OZrPOJaTg03nYcyqA43 u0TeV5Zrah/itNyw+0aHBskIrIaz3FVf+n/8w/MtsvisBb3Of2JJs/8fmsjCywcUF/3CNdVrVpr+1 YeXn45Wg==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1s23rK-00000008i8i-3AML; Wed, 01 May 2024 06:54:30 +0000 Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 23:54:30 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: aalbersh@redhat.com, ebiggers@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, alexl@redhat.com, walters@verbum.org, fsverity@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/26] xfs: widen flags argument to the xfs_iflags_* helpers Message-ID: References: <171444680291.957659.15782417454902691461.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <171444680584.957659.3744585033664433370.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <171444680584.957659.3744585033664433370.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 08:27:29PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > From: Darrick J. Wong > > xfs_inode.i_flags is an unsigned long, so make these helpers take that > as the flags argument instead of unsigned short. This is needed for the > next patch. > > While we're at it, remove the iflags variable from xfs_iget_cache_miss > because we no longer need it. I just reinvented this for another flag in work in progress code. Can we just get included in the current for-next tree?