From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3080F12E75; Thu, 2 May 2024 04:56:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714625785; cv=none; b=L2G+Api1G1Gh+BkAZH7Izy3jM3FpaVRUsGxoJvZaSrXR+efuiv5gDQo8xAVQini6u2d2aiylOqqc+om27yzFimd1ML6PSwd2KGMBRxKLFvLZjp3endUfWzN5rqdunSetsldaAjhrG1AhKvV2l+rVgYkrANaWfiJNykbXoD4VGqE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714625785; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RErIiwb7KjrEtrPM9oUJGIHwPjqy1LLfD6E4dtZSJD4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=a47jKaOYk+wCTeM0H95mYEhHYUtkjema6v/9CU+GWS/szIm9avI8DJWEn6rk8bCymaO8k8+M/glQr64MU3dOKXQXJ2gGcyo5gublrtxbOTiFlQ+O/+sUkauXMN2EGvkQQCT/cert3zpjCgCEI7fHSwuHtIY8m6OvydnBQL22ATo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=o9TdPa3k; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="o9TdPa3k" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=e5fKejql7xfOpfCARvldQffDWhG7LhQH8yq4p2P85lA=; b=o9TdPa3kX4u8nLyUZ3Vo3RW1MH eN0FcLBZD7EO/pqXwOasZ+CxqLLFFGZd3CFfMF0g4zBfsZJWUo3s3QqWslzuVyXK5ZednicbxQCL8 nBd+4xPRvM5MCdANS9IrwG4fNOAJ2/zQkW/3wlgKo663ly8lcglaJItpegysKJMZR3qF5iLLMcLME QE5djPwC4376IoDSpAHvjnug/Qw+74aE92awRRcNbyPcW21hyoH9AroJopjLMERSFx+YhETVxqkKH 0eoRo7E/GBPTusKB7zotUKihzc1dwlHzUwcmyOte2QjD5cwsMAvGygoGOuoGR9pDKrn0D3as6dO58 EruIZk4A==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1s2OUY-0000000BT8V-1eqi; Thu, 02 May 2024 04:56:22 +0000 Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 21:56:22 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Chandan Babu R , aalbersh@redhat.com, ebiggers@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, alexl@redhat.com, walters@verbum.org, fsverity@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/26] xfs: use unsigned ints for non-negative quantities in xfs_attr_remote.c Message-ID: References: <171444680291.957659.15782417454902691461.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <171444680378.957659.14973171617153243991.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <20240501223927.GI360919@frogsfrogsfrogs> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240501223927.GI360919@frogsfrogsfrogs> X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 03:39:27PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Can we please get this included ASAP instead of having it linger around? > > Chandan, how many more patches are you willing to take for 6.10? I > think Christoph has a bunch of fully-reviewed cleanups lurking on the > list, and then there's this one. Also a bunch of more bugfixes for the log recovery out of bounds access and the racy iext accesses. Although I need to respin that last series for the name change requested by Dave unless someone disagrees with that. But even if it's not or 6.10 I would so love if we could feed this kind of generally useful cleanups upstream ASAP instead of reposting it hundreds of times or have it linger in a branch somewhere. That just leads to frustranting rebases, conflicts and reinventions. You have quite a few more candidates like that in your patch stack.