From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EABF13B590; Thu, 9 May 2024 12:58:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715259510; cv=none; b=utdBAJvSakhQvsZ9qniw3YEolmb4cKCZkUa08me0vdV0c2ynRK3XOu3RX6nKeSW8BnADXikcYqQQEPd8C571LAnTmeI+2BlnP9DlqlZHzbt8b+fzFXcFyBARALf1OXTBr+VrFUXukwT+MTq+wIng4UEdtgfwAy7870PZxya4ZRo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715259510; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MKC9wCjSQVelLnxG27A3NgjqV66DuuMiZIDzudaJX34=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=tgzUocSf3Y/GWFgBQ93Xuh2EDWf3UbIeCAzbdacwBw6PYovfAQKjtaAjnWwqWW+buEg5gPkjMXTH/Z2dOtIgQ1hFm9/FGh7i8PjaF7AfqQpbCxczZ472bKXDMD4bNWmg19ru5kv+n1+oxsNmiXWvR2ZK+0eiwHNX091kvxiWQGI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=TS/zwIpI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="TS/zwIpI" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=P8JtwUqTZ5thY5C0o8JQ9jcIA6kib8zFsh+AmPPcQkw=; b=TS/zwIpI/RgjwOZIRNph0V1iPg HFcQKqlkwrUU+z/fSblzUSWWo/CcR1JozYosfXC/3cdu1Krwf7lInvpoP222XBUJKgn7j696Q9aQR oYbe3BcJjc1IykDXgGRB9TPZZTQis23b4wjWRNFOS+7GVflB14MGtUSobZkXZAJfT/EV3/rHtvz/E 3DQ1XkVZK7NZoMbuowRbe/cbywe/SgPkRkpu5Jk8VXha4nEGm3JFYGO2luu2m0t5hwwRgwxFAyMLi ElSwArKsC7VSDkGuTwnIvysLt55peuNMyVDcWSnVM7kSpgantdDoj/5YSZIrx6ED4eSteU5z2AGhr aL1XHHdw==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1s53Lr-00000001VQ2-0TaS; Thu, 09 May 2024 12:58:23 +0000 Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 05:58:23 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , hch@lst.de, willy@infradead.org, mcgrof@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, brauner@kernel.org, chandan.babu@oracle.com, david@fromorbit.com, djwong@kernel.org, gost.dev@samsung.com, hare@suse.de, john.g.garry@oracle.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, p.raghav@samsung.com, ritesh.list@gmail.com, ziy@nvidia.com Subject: Re: [RFC] iomap: use huge zero folio in iomap_dio_zero Message-ID: References: <20240503095353.3798063-8-mcgrof@kernel.org> <20240507145811.52987-1-kernel@pankajraghav.com> <20240508113949.pwyeavrc2rrwsxw2@quentin> <20240509123107.hhi3lzjcn5svejvk@quentin> <20240509125514.2i3a7yo657frjqwq@quentin> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240509125514.2i3a7yo657frjqwq@quentin> X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 12:55:14PM +0000, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote: > We might still fail here during mount. My question is: do we also fail > the mount if folio_alloc fails? Yes. Like any other allocation that fails at mount time.