From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DD877345D for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2024 04:50:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717735804; cv=none; b=Jr/nmTMvAzFuhsxpBmpje0FTZ9qgYNsPYP4oTXUDxJJnFHbKC27DQGBZB4b1eecMGsuESBld92jDz3+/0VFZlzJin0NZ0A8vGyh4wYpVlNLy9RqlWN8AZ2+H/0CF8mcQeXvKUh3hb0lof3wrRqddzDamM3qwb4OQnZxUjlj3zUM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717735804; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1OMwRxgwj+2Lw2MVW9xikQESYYRalRbmuAOI6SNrrD8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=h4wsrjbp8Cwc+ZBZyST3/yN17Kk5nqplZGXy5jMJb1MHibnJdrZZmrjZvMZCZTiHk++14wm3QRgkTyekJkdxlUF43h9MBFFcneoL8k4QRBWLtfrq60j0WHRmW4tqwTOtiWHeQjmOU9yIWm+nGjV/TZFAk+riMSUyAuvqdGwryrw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=Ytg5WFU7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="Ytg5WFU7" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=sEaKrvURUcenTvmCUulgLPcsbg1aXtm+VQO4NA9UfeQ=; b=Ytg5WFU7NOSrVIBE5f3gNcEJk8 dFH8jsgBDMQD82D1D938nd7OTZM5+r+9R7QIfZvO28BW86fxCeCpKMp+ppRs7b3jR/1pscyRA1WQF +meQ7RK2o6vq7rYpSE7Zo7vqWHHsKSgQp0l9iF8b0B2G50GOmbTE88J5DW9zd6Guw6u+a5GQbuB9H 5m6j9WwMEEuYgZs/n4pxVmxaxGsVzq2q9xFUDCWCIl2fpCKVemiOnc+ObbZe7/wJrQ8ryZjaaoohG Mt83kBO0geK0HBxrBmoSR2o82VY/bKaS9BX1QbgE6XQhKCCqKzfOlT0ztZ/Opti4CP+xuUCTUChwI dFv3KsNg==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sFRY4-0000000CPCQ-08Cd; Fri, 07 Jun 2024 04:49:56 +0000 Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 21:49:55 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Dave Chinner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Bernd Schubert , Kent Overstreet , Miklos Szeredi , Amir Goldstein , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm" , Andrew Morton , "linux-mm@kvack.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 06/19] Add a vmalloc_node_user function Message-ID: References: <20240529-fuse-uring-for-6-9-rfc2-out-v1-0-d149476b1d65@ddn.com> <20240529-fuse-uring-for-6-9-rfc2-out-v1-6-d149476b1d65@ddn.com> <984577b6-e23d-4eec-a5da-214c5b3572ba@ddn.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 12:30:27PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > IOWs, vmalloc() has obeyed GFP_NOFS/GFP_NOIO constraints properly > for since early 2022 and there isn't a need to wrap it with scopes > just to do a single constrained allocation: Perfect. Doesn't change that we still need some amount of filterting, e.g. GFP_COMP and vmalloc won't mix too well.