From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from submarine.notk.org (62-210-214-84.rev.poneytelecom.eu [62.210.214.84]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1CA73D3B8; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 20:50:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.210.214.84 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718916618; cv=none; b=OcLXR+gDKLZ1vwHCwveoZNxneJAsHnlHaZkoo2r8ERzTFcVeJH2Dmd7HjeVzS36YnAsMPk1I3kJpJsciMCprfYJRbw6xh5kc7mO7nK1D/lmeQ5tUgOXGVdbALe1bjivgImBeqMx8H4XCAT/K9tIKAlwknkROlGoAnT5S5SgUPeM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718916618; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AvGVFTfgQ8CQv1Ova9G8llKmivCTuZfd3jl734L9bIE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=TggXoK4Q1dS4G3j/kMm6dHRd116TfXOEA7c3wU2lS8eT7kg3f2NhKJCr1RejTTc1SCpkExX2thyxAYWu/EK/lLsVIbDRI7dnXIONTA4ZHvgwTRbaOOyYGX6454Ge4ysiG3CSI5SENOQycLhjztzZqjiEOGysKknDz5R9nRNeyxM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=codewreck.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=codewreck.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=codewreck.org header.i=@codewreck.org header.b=ALJdfkXV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.210.214.84 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=codewreck.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=codewreck.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=codewreck.org header.i=@codewreck.org header.b="ALJdfkXV" Received: from gaia.codewreck.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submarine.notk.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A5F214C2DD; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 22:50:08 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codewreck.org; s=2; t=1718916615; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=VLVCmMswFYW/yptkreRA4q0clrbQSOEC9H3udI4LuGU=; b=ALJdfkXV4jYbTnxVURz9T/eVwi75e+Jpzd/NnEdNtowVW0EPginJ+UR6WjORHnH38deSjd uJwnIU9Cj7KamD9RuKu8/mGuiDvl4zepXXeiSbVTriN0efe9Ugz46seuDEdUL9p7r7KRLr P7bpbNTjSYBxjIuPaVX1MWKzMKecMwktnyLawuNoID0Mbc/ddEMnIWkpd3XG+6pyYH418a 3W/N9t5Qfs/oTZaI9U3i3KvnPFWdkdWReTPrI5Iv2PcSTYiBLmAJf7px1y70cBjtciXJPK i5woghwPVaymjTFrWRyF7a/0NAHSSLe6Bk1rVFeZVi+wKnfbRR0RGgGH6UokHw== Received: from localhost (gaia.codewreck.org [local]) by gaia.codewreck.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 39921304; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 20:50:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 05:49:49 +0900 From: Dominique Martinet To: David Howells Cc: Christian Brauner , Steve French , Matthew Wilcox , Jeff Layton , Gao Xiang , Marc Dionne , Paulo Alcantara , Shyam Prasad N , Tom Talpey , Eric Van Hensbergen , Ilya Dryomov , netfs@lists.linux.dev, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, v9fs@lists.linux.dev, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Latchesar Ionkov , Christian Schoenebeck Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/17] 9p: Enable multipage folios Message-ID: References: <20240620173137.610345-1-dhowells@redhat.com> <20240620173137.610345-7-dhowells@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Dominique Martinet wrote on Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 05:34:49AM +0900: > David Howells wrote on Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 06:31:24PM +0100: > > Enable support for multipage folios on the 9P filesystem. This is all > > handled through netfslib and is already enabled on AFS and CIFS also. > > Since this is fairly unrelated to the other patches let's take this > through the 9p tree as well - I'll run some quick tests to verify writes > go from 4k to something larger (huh, my memory is rotten, we were already aggregating writes at some point without this. Oh, well, at least it doesn't seem to blow up) > and it doesn't blow up immediately and push it out for 6.11 Queued for -next. -- Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus