From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8722B1514F3 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 13:20:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721740854; cv=none; b=qYVUnbjgwgcAC25fgIdrbNuYVUtqmr4wJlX5TD0RbvzRhXrPvVekCsmZecYaorKvlr9I4FDjSAfadAkMsuDOs/PhhqPlAx+lnH7/6qYwXhXnjnP4wBcICF6hvTakgc39KC1jWDnyTSGNPvdt5w02Rxpma97XgAuvg7MIdFEVu5k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721740854; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GznZx83qLzLwfY5R8qVMtQs++l7ZxcEy5TKy1gX3v5A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=G4Fn40AUXvTVj6OIF17ODCZRx9WbwOCsRmZZ+yGEe9sVrCkSLhwoFjfZD+7ce4EVduDqEOJhL993BZFkAUfYpa6LnUP+a/k2y5kfYzEsl1qfhO+f1zAVxXingi0PQKfR+RBmlJHeSisOEFrxgFlKKoDM4UdnQpYvnUrgb7QXUAk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=CBF5X8Uy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="CBF5X8Uy" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=3ZaBSTcNGLsNsHotGx6Ku2kTYfstMYbrCs+0ypZFM7s=; b=CBF5X8UyAvhc+tChqxHV9h5hQI wiZjr3oYnodEnM/ZeJ6eoHn7a4XHFn4jE1n8o/wcrSgEgqRA5wSnO0KnOYoUMIu3DWx2Ue97oE/9w o1YPefCmi41skEqxIjFVCSuZi+Q8eh2xoQyNvLnnRw0PhZDCmHtCApd7K8nANrRE8anjZ2etW0STo qIrfWrinXs0K2xELR2YwqL605uuUxW8Idh5vkGoSUevgcplba1Ner0bnN86+b1dzF0Ucdb/eMzFwv wOANaKpef2feG0nQpkvqxDl8UZPhdE5oF4uEz9MBxJ3LrYJwpSnMyvJZCTUdOYTgAZ9qIjLS/z5df /p6I/jtg==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sWFRe-00000006tv7-3fx3; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 13:20:46 +0000 Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 14:20:46 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Christian Brauner Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] Convert write_begin / write_end to take a folio Message-ID: References: <20240717154716.237943-1-willy@infradead.org> <20240723-einfuhr-benachbarten-f1abb87dd181@brauner> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240723-einfuhr-benachbarten-f1abb87dd181@brauner> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 09:49:10AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 04:46:50PM GMT, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > You can find the full branch at > > http://git.infradead.org/?p=users/willy/pagecache.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/write-end > > aka > > git://git.infradead.org/users/willy/pagecache.git write-end > > > > On top of the ufs, minix, sysv and qnx6 directory handling patches, this > > patch series converts us to using folios for write_begin and write_end. > > That's the last mention of 'struct page' in several filesystems. > > > > I'd like to get some version of these patches into the 6.12 merge > > window. > > Is it stable enough that I can already pull it from you? > I'd like this to be based on v6.11-rc1. It's stable in that it works, but it's still based on linux-next. I think it probably depends on a few fs git pulls that are still outstanding. More awkwardly for merging is that it depends on the four directory handling patch series, each of which you've put on a separate topic branch. So I'm not sure how you want to handle that.