From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65C2C2901 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 05:27:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723613261; cv=none; b=S+Q1hQuDbIxIAoXt9iMUE1rEru5/nBDZKaPwxOrbdVvmV3dFD1Q5+H/2Uq82z3mm1cv8CdLMJueSYd7MjtY7MWvvqUxYDe0MG/JRUd0NtyKl5tX+L5WAgMIdV7dOVY8ScZr0BX10rxRVTBXri0bD3cxNxKpwRT0WKXZR5FiLPOY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723613261; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uTmuPCBrtrBsT0S2i1XZjSDqCyaWTXay+HNddyUeA68=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=OOSuYh4ZIzfMSK2LzaGeBOV2VhS0wg2yjNITroXOuWM8bJ1k/YefTNriefvyH9rAI0pu59Kzm/JwxMnvzVx0QqKQho6g7Q/INoYWnsFJONT4uqrvbXG3Uknj1kNO06Dn5TYMyTbo2ltpPKjs81d9aJkEe73jP7SjGGjLsQ1tW2E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=Qb16q3Js; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="Qb16q3Js" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=aevGGSQc0VDR/d6wuXp/nfXCQB1eisuqo6Ik/+jFkJw=; b=Qb16q3JsdsN7s4kWdj4ZZvXBL3 4lf1p/6wn1Fb2JDM/kP8Q19dt9dLO+93dhZk2dD+736piFVbXEyVzCxsCizWqt8CrBrkn4ZxwHlpO 1ztmPDoDibogaINHXfQgKvY8atxnJmFAMu+OtAf1urIm0bCNhJIu09yhzm4GV25vgFQd+ew5AH64H jgw2u4VwwCk1pJVthvhh1X+IxvaeIAfDnwDNZLFot5/4hRfxaOT5uFGSCn4E2bGqPngCfDfF0WqhQ Nvs4dFMlQMFZNwqyzLG1XlnuWgMx/t1PoSNgX6nuF5wVDJgRHFoX+QlE49bEQiRAoRvwAYsi+J5Ha QDL7fiJg==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1se6Xq-00000005nr9-3DHe; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 05:27:38 +0000 Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 22:27:38 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Yafang Shao Cc: Christoph Hellwig , akpm@linux-foundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, david@fromorbit.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Kent Overstreet , Vlastimil Babka , Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Add memalloc_nowait_{save,restore} Message-ID: References: <20240812090525.80299-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com> <20240812090525.80299-2-laoar.shao@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html > There are already memalloc_noreclaim_{save,restore} which imply __GFP_MEMALLOC: > > memalloc_noreclaim_save - Marks implicit __GFP_MEMALLOC scope. .. and those are horrible misnamed :( If we can't even keep our APIs consistently name, who is supposed to understand all this?