From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
"Rick P. Edgecombe" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>,
Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>,
Yury Khrustalev <yury.khrustalev@arm.com>,
Wilco Dijkstra <wilco.dijkstra@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 19/39] arm64/mm: Handle GCS data aborts
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 17:12:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZsdjbsDrMWgBU9Hj@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240822-arm64-gcs-v11-19-41b81947ecb5@kernel.org>
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 02:15:22AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> index 451ba7cbd5ad..3ada31c2ac12 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> @@ -486,6 +486,14 @@ static void do_bad_area(unsigned long far, unsigned long esr,
> }
> }
>
> +static bool is_gcs_fault(unsigned long esr)
> +{
> + if (!esr_is_data_abort(esr))
> + return false;
> +
> + return ESR_ELx_ISS2(esr) & ESR_ELx_GCS;
> +}
> +
> static bool is_el0_instruction_abort(unsigned long esr)
> {
> return ESR_ELx_EC(esr) == ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_LOW;
> @@ -500,6 +508,23 @@ static bool is_write_abort(unsigned long esr)
> return (esr & ESR_ELx_WNR) && !(esr & ESR_ELx_CM);
> }
>
> +static bool is_invalid_gcs_access(struct vm_area_struct *vma, u64 esr)
> +{
> + if (!system_supports_gcs())
> + return false;
> +
> + if (unlikely(is_gcs_fault(esr))) {
> + /* GCS accesses must be performed on a GCS page */
> + if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHADOW_STACK))
> + return true;
This first check covers the GCSPOPM/RET etc. permission faults on
non-GCS vmas. It looks correct.
> + } else if (unlikely(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHADOW_STACK)) {
> + /* Only GCS operations can write to a GCS page */
> + return is_write_abort(esr);
> + }
I don't think that's right. The ESR on this path may not even indicate a
data abort and ESR.WnR bit check wouldn't make sense.
I presume we want to avoid an infinite loop on a (writeable) GCS page
when the user does a normal STR but the CPU raises a permission fault. I
think this function needs to just return false if !esr_is_data_abort().
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static int __kprobes do_page_fault(unsigned long far, unsigned long esr,
> struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> @@ -535,6 +560,14 @@ static int __kprobes do_page_fault(unsigned long far, unsigned long esr,
> /* It was exec fault */
> vm_flags = VM_EXEC;
> mm_flags |= FAULT_FLAG_INSTRUCTION;
> + } else if (is_gcs_fault(esr)) {
> + /*
> + * The GCS permission on a page implies both read and
> + * write so always handle any GCS fault as a write fault,
> + * we need to trigger CoW even for GCS reads.
> + */
> + vm_flags = VM_WRITE;
> + mm_flags |= FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
> } else if (is_write_abort(esr)) {
> /* It was write fault */
> vm_flags = VM_WRITE;
> @@ -568,6 +601,13 @@ static int __kprobes do_page_fault(unsigned long far, unsigned long esr,
> if (!vma)
> goto lock_mmap;
>
> + if (is_invalid_gcs_access(vma, esr)) {
> + vma_end_read(vma);
> + fault = 0;
> + si_code = SEGV_ACCERR;
> + goto bad_area;
> + }
Here there's a risk that the above function returns true for some
unrelated fault that happens to have bit 6 in ESR set.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-22 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-22 1:15 [PATCH v11 00/39] arm64/gcs: Provide support for GCS in userspace Mark Brown
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 01/39] mm: Introduce ARCH_HAS_USER_SHADOW_STACK Mark Brown
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 02/39] arm64/mm: Restructure arch_validate_flags() for extensibility Mark Brown
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 03/39] prctl: arch-agnostic prctl for shadow stack Mark Brown
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 04/39] mman: Add map_shadow_stack() flags Mark Brown
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 05/39] arm64: Document boot requirements for Guarded Control Stacks Mark Brown
2024-08-22 8:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 06/39] arm64/gcs: Document the ABI " Mark Brown
2024-08-22 10:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 07/39] arm64/sysreg: Add definitions for architected GCS caps Mark Brown
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 08/39] arm64/gcs: Add manual encodings of GCS instructions Mark Brown
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 09/39] arm64/gcs: Provide put_user_gcs() Mark Brown
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 10/39] arm64/gcs: Provide basic EL2 setup to allow GCS usage at EL0 and EL1 Mark Brown
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 11/39] arm64/cpufeature: Runtime detection of Guarded Control Stack (GCS) Mark Brown
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 12/39] arm64/mm: Allocate PIE slots for EL0 guarded control stack Mark Brown
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 13/39] mm: Define VM_SHADOW_STACK for arm64 when we support GCS Mark Brown
2024-08-22 10:14 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 14/39] arm64/mm: Map pages for guarded control stack Mark Brown
2024-08-22 10:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 15/39] KVM: arm64: Manage GCS access and registers for guests Mark Brown
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 16/39] arm64/idreg: Add overrride for GCS Mark Brown
2024-08-22 11:30 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 17/39] arm64/hwcap: Add hwcap " Mark Brown
2024-08-22 11:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 18/39] arm64/traps: Handle GCS exceptions Mark Brown
2024-08-22 11:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-08-22 15:44 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-08-22 16:31 ` Mark Brown
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 19/39] arm64/mm: Handle GCS data aborts Mark Brown
2024-08-22 16:12 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2024-08-22 16:44 ` Mark Brown
2024-08-22 17:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-08-22 17:30 ` Mark Brown
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 20/39] arm64/gcs: Context switch GCS state for EL0 Mark Brown
2024-08-22 16:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 21/39] arm64/gcs: Ensure that new threads have a GCS Mark Brown
2024-08-22 16:17 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-08-22 16:24 ` Mark Brown
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 22/39] arm64/gcs: Implement shadow stack prctl() interface Mark Brown
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 23/39] arm64/mm: Implement map_shadow_stack() Mark Brown
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 24/39] arm64/signal: Set up and restore the GCS context for signal handlers Mark Brown
2024-08-23 9:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 25/39] arm64/signal: Expose GCS state in signal frames Mark Brown
2024-08-23 9:37 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-08-23 10:25 ` Mark Brown
2024-08-23 15:59 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-08-23 22:01 ` Mark Brown
2024-08-26 10:00 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-08-28 17:32 ` Mark Brown
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 26/39] arm64/ptrace: Expose GCS via ptrace and core files Mark Brown
2024-08-23 9:41 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 27/39] arm64: Add Kconfig for Guarded Control Stack (GCS) Mark Brown
2024-08-23 9:48 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 28/39] kselftest/arm64: Verify the GCS hwcap Mark Brown
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 29/39] kselftest/arm64: Add GCS as a detected feature in the signal tests Mark Brown
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 30/39] kselftest/arm64: Add framework support for GCS to signal handling tests Mark Brown
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 31/39] kselftest/arm64: Allow signals tests to specify an expected si_code Mark Brown
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 32/39] kselftest/arm64: Always run signals tests with GCS enabled Mark Brown
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 33/39] kselftest/arm64: Add very basic GCS test program Mark Brown
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 34/39] kselftest/arm64: Add a GCS test program built with the system libc Mark Brown
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 35/39] kselftest/arm64: Add test coverage for GCS mode locking Mark Brown
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 36/39] kselftest/arm64: Add GCS signal tests Mark Brown
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 37/39] kselftest/arm64: Add a GCS stress test Mark Brown
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 38/39] kselftest/arm64: Enable GCS for the FP stress tests Mark Brown
2024-08-22 1:15 ` [PATCH v11 39/39] KVM: selftests: arm64: Add GCS registers to get-reg-list Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZsdjbsDrMWgBU9Hj@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=debug@rivosinc.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=ross.burton@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
--cc=wilco.dijkstra@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yury.khrustalev@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).