From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
"Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@pankajraghav.com>,
brauner@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
chandan.babu@oracle.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
djwong@kernel.org, hare@suse.de, gost.dev@samsung.com,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, david@fromorbit.com,
yang@os.amperecomputing.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, john.g.garry@oracle.com,
cl@os.amperecomputing.com, p.raghav@samsung.com,
ryan.roberts@arm.com, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 04/10] mm: split a folio in minimum folio order chunks
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 16:41:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZtEHPAsIHKxUHBZX@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <221FAE59-097C-4D31-A500-B09EDB07C285@nvidia.com>
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 06:12:26PM -0400, Zi Yan wrote:
> The issue is that the change to split_huge_page() makes split_huge_page_to_list_to_order()
> unlocks the wrong subpage. split_huge_page() used to pass the “page” pointer
> to split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(), which keeps that “page” still locked.
> But this patch changes the “page” passed into split_huge_page_to_list_to_order()
> always to the head page.
>
> This fixes the crash on my x86 VM, but it can be improved:
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> index 7c50aeed0522..eff5d2fb5d4e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> @@ -320,10 +320,7 @@ bool can_split_folio(struct folio *folio, int *pextra_pins);
> int split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
> unsigned int new_order);
> int split_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *list);
> -static inline int split_huge_page(struct page *page)
> -{
> - return split_folio(page_folio(page));
> -}
> +int split_huge_page(struct page *page);
> void deferred_split_folio(struct folio *folio);
>
> void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index c29af9451d92..4d723dab4336 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -3297,6 +3297,25 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +int split_huge_page(struct page *page)
> +{
> + unsigned int min_order = 0;
> + struct folio *folio = page_folio(page);
> +
> + if (folio_test_anon(folio))
> + goto out;
> +
> + if (!folio->mapping) {
> + if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio))
> + count_vm_event(THP_SPLIT_PAGE_FAILED);
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> +
> + min_order = mapping_min_folio_order(folio->mapping);
> +out:
> + return split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(page, NULL, min_order);
> +}
> +
> int split_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *list)
> {
> unsigned int min_order = 0;
Confirmed, and also although you suggest it can be improved, I thought
that we could do that by sharing more code and putting things in the
headers, the below also fixes this but tries to share more code, but
I think it is perhaps less easier to understand than your patch.
So I think your patch is cleaner and easier as a fix.
diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
index c275aa9cc105..99cd9c7bf55b 100644
--- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ extern struct kobj_attribute thpsize_shmem_enabled_attr;
(!!thp_vma_allowable_orders(vma, vm_flags, tva_flags, BIT(order)))
#define split_folio(f) split_folio_to_list(f, NULL)
+#define split_folio_to_list(f, list) split_page_folio_to_list(&f->page, f, list)
#ifdef CONFIG_PGTABLE_HAS_HUGE_LEAVES
#define HPAGE_PMD_SHIFT PMD_SHIFT
@@ -331,10 +332,11 @@ unsigned long thp_get_unmapped_area_vmflags(struct file *filp, unsigned long add
bool can_split_folio(struct folio *folio, int caller_pins, int *pextra_pins);
int split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
unsigned int new_order);
-int split_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *list);
+int split_page_folio_to_list(struct page *page, struct folio *folio,
+ struct list_head *list);
static inline int split_huge_page(struct page *page)
{
- return split_folio(page_folio(page));
+ return split_page_folio_to_list(page, page_folio(page), NULL);
}
void deferred_split_folio(struct folio *folio);
@@ -511,7 +513,9 @@ static inline int split_huge_page(struct page *page)
return 0;
}
-static inline int split_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *list)
+static inline int split_page_folio_to_list(struct page *page,
+ struct folio *folio,
+ struct list_head *list)
{
return 0;
}
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 169f1a71c95d..b115bfe63b52 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -3529,7 +3529,8 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
return ret;
}
-int split_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *list)
+int split_page_folio_to_list(struct page *page, struct folio *folio,
+ struct list_head *list)
{
unsigned int min_order = 0;
@@ -3544,8 +3545,7 @@ int split_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *list)
min_order = mapping_min_folio_order(folio->mapping);
out:
- return split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(&folio->page, list,
- min_order);
+ return split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(page, list, min_order);
}
void __folio_undo_large_rmappable(struct folio *folio)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-29 23:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-22 13:50 [PATCH v13 00/10] enable bs > ps in XFS Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-08-22 13:50 ` [PATCH v13 01/10] fs: Allow fine-grained control of folio sizes Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-08-23 13:09 ` Daniel Gomez
2024-08-22 13:50 ` [PATCH v13 02/10] filemap: allocate mapping_min_order folios in the page cache Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-08-22 13:50 ` [PATCH v13 03/10] readahead: allocate folios with mapping_min_order in readahead Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-08-22 13:50 ` [PATCH v13 04/10] mm: split a folio in minimum folio order chunks Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-08-29 10:51 ` Sven Schnelle
2024-08-29 18:46 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-08-29 19:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-29 22:12 ` Zi Yan
2024-08-29 23:41 ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]
2024-08-30 5:57 ` Sven Schnelle
2024-08-30 11:58 ` Daniel Gomez
2024-08-30 14:59 ` Pankaj Raghav
2024-08-30 17:12 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-08-31 22:38 ` Zi Yan
2024-08-30 22:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-31 22:35 ` Zi Yan
2024-08-29 22:11 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-06 6:52 ` Lai, Yi
2024-09-06 8:01 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-09-09 9:06 ` Lai, Yi
2024-08-22 13:50 ` [PATCH v13 05/10] filemap: cap PTE range to be created to allowed zero fill in folio_map_range() Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-08-22 13:50 ` [PATCH v13 06/10] iomap: fix iomap_dio_zero() for fs bs > system page size Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-08-22 13:50 ` [PATCH v13 07/10] xfs: use kvmalloc for xattr buffers Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-08-22 13:50 ` [PATCH v13 08/10] xfs: expose block size in stat Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-08-22 13:50 ` [PATCH v13 09/10] xfs: make the calculation generic in xfs_sb_validate_fsb_count() Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-08-22 13:50 ` [PATCH v13 10/10] xfs: enable block size larger than page size support Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2024-09-03 12:29 ` [PATCH v13 10/10] xfs: enable block size larger than page size support^[ Daniel Gomez
2024-08-22 21:23 ` [PATCH v13 00/10] enable bs > ps in XFS Luis Chamberlain
2024-08-23 12:36 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZtEHPAsIHKxUHBZX@bombadil.infradead.org \
--to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=cl@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).