From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1E1218B478; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 07:49:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729064958; cv=none; b=mxr94FqRHJdYt/ZWWzAlA3glTFQdQCXfqqcsztRS1mnNErvu5IShq2lPpLyI5RQevZUUReod3djtDV2xPEZAmn5Ch3taJG56voIwUN7Y2UjPLsWm0rkIS8K16uh5kQgNE4QsYDcscNQuIOKNaSF/OdyVbxt1eTe0TGRIItG27sg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729064958; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IzsmLlwfaIis3r+L2uUV7WwIF00DA6OD0N/c6Ri8B10=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=uQKzGhCAB/II+JcJcZJbONCj4P3XkujpaTuib3a2ScQvNL2OXj+hl2BY5HsHMiJ3510fNO6Rf38gZITl1A/EpeGYgL4MXJpqO1UH9Fj0AKurwB8PeDlsZCimQ3pb6x6FpxmacOzAByOHmimyMnw/HxhxJIM9bjIKrmvuWLl39Fc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=iHws6EyK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="iHws6EyK" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=0qKRBfEVzhI+Kl9eHwDgM61+8JkG6X9yHvoS3jAAp8g=; b=iHws6EyKinBxOTGlnFWXDU5CL3 9Xzhiou9RhnLaazWwPcBQLhi2w6li+wxHGRw3C+fjXCPnYV0QLJuznToG2/BH4tkg1/wNgWpj2kcw RUdRY9DuIKvtvmmnM8Tkc4xDyQxzwB/+BgCSg8pT1vu5ookOCOC7UMMM/Ri2oeVHUeGn4+mXnBo5E P6zXA9QPF/qTFHZNcVwzb3p++BCHnjlehEUvPOfg6Dcubf9W2o+3whAVhTBTsTTkSA+ooQ7jUfox4 cq9Er8+Bcg/wRiGgduoOM1c+obHzlSsRUZ8g7azCkSjbtBJoUL6zwPvCSPNP1Xi5rnbxRIewmnpfd 5dMsVWTA==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1t0ymR-0000000At2v-22pc; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 07:49:15 +0000 Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:49:15 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Song Liu Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Song Liu , bpf , Linux-Fsdevel , LKML , Kernel Team , Andrii Nakryiko , Eduard Zingerman , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Martin KaFai Lau , Al Viro , Christian Brauner , Jan Kara , KP Singh , Matt Bobrowski Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Extend test fs_kfuncs to cover security.bpf xattr names Message-ID: References: <20241002214637.3625277-1-song@kernel.org> <20241002214637.3625277-3-song@kernel.org> <0DB83868-0049-40E3-8E62-0D8D913CB9CB@fb.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 01:54:08PM +0000, Song Liu wrote: > Agreed that using security.bpf xattrs are better for this use case. > In fact, this patchset adds the support for security.bpf xattrs. > Support for user.* xattrs were added last year. I think we'll need to revert it ASAP before it hits distros.