Re: [PATCH 01/12] iomap: check if folio size is equal to FS block size

[Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>]

On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 04:04:28PM -0400, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
> Filesystems such as BTRFS use folio->private so that they receive a
> callback while releasing folios. Add check if folio size is same as
> filesystem block size while evaluating iomap_folio_state from
> folio->private.
> 
> I am hoping this will be removed when all of btrfs code has moved to
> iomap and BTRFS uses iomap's subpage.

This seems like a terrible explanation for why you need this patch.

As I understand it, what you're really doing is saying that iomap only
uses folio->private for block size < folio size.  So if you add this
hack, iomap won't look at folio->private for block size == folio size
and that means that btrfs can continue to use it.

I don't think this is a good way to start the conversion.  I appreciate
that it's a long, complex procedure, and you can't do the whole
conversion in a single patchset.

Also, please stop calling this "subpage".  That's btrfs terminology,
it's confusing as hell, and it should be deleted from your brain.

But I don't understand why you need it at all.  btrfs doesn't attach
private data to folios unless block size < page size.  Which is precisely
the case that you're not using.  So it seems like you could just drop
this patch and everything would still work.