public inbox for linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] iomap: allow passing a folio into write begin path
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 09:29:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zz3yUlYfrqAKiwbV@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zz2gEfgY8G7oTpdV@infradead.org>

On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 12:38:41AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 10:46:53AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> > To facilitate batch processing of dirty folios for zero range, tweak
> > the write begin path to allow the caller to optionally pass in its
> > own folio/pos combination.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> > index ce73d2a48c1e..d1a86aea1a7a 100644
> > --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> > +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> > @@ -781,7 +781,7 @@ static int iomap_write_begin(struct iomap_iter *iter, loff_t pos,
> >  {
> >  	const struct iomap_folio_ops *folio_ops = iter->iomap.folio_ops;
> >  	const struct iomap *srcmap = iomap_iter_srcmap(iter);
> > -	struct folio *folio;
> > +	struct folio *folio = *foliop;
> >  	int status = 0;
> >  
> >  	BUG_ON(pos + len > iter->iomap.offset + iter->iomap.length);
> > @@ -794,9 +794,15 @@ static int iomap_write_begin(struct iomap_iter *iter, loff_t pos,
> >  	if (!mapping_large_folio_support(iter->inode->i_mapping))
> >  		len = min_t(size_t, len, PAGE_SIZE - offset_in_page(pos));
> >  
> > -	folio = __iomap_get_folio(iter, pos, len);
> > -	if (IS_ERR(folio))
> > -		return PTR_ERR(folio);
> > +	/*
> > +	 * XXX: Might want to plumb batch handling down through here. For now
> > +	 * let the caller do it.
> 
> Yeah, plumbing in the batch here would be nicer.
> 

Ok, I'll take a closer look at that. IIRC I punted on it initially
because we'll also have to fix up pos/len down in this path when the
next folio is not contiguous. This was easier to just get the basics
working.

Brian

> I suspect doing batch processing might actually be a neat thing for
> the normal write patch as well.
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-20 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-19 15:46 [PATCH RFC 0/4] iomap: zero range folio batch processing prototype Brian Foster
2024-11-19 15:46 ` [PATCH RFC 1/4] iomap: allow passing a folio into write begin path Brian Foster
2024-11-20  8:38   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-20 14:29     ` Brian Foster [this message]
2024-11-19 15:46 ` [PATCH RFC 2/4] iomap: optional zero range dirty folio processing Brian Foster
2024-11-20  8:43   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-20 14:34     ` Brian Foster
2024-11-19 15:46 ` [PATCH RFC 3/4] xfs: always trim mapping to requested range for zero range Brian Foster
2024-11-19 15:46 ` [PATCH RFC 4/4] xfs: fill dirty folios on zero range of unwritten mappings Brian Foster
2024-11-20  8:37 ` [PATCH RFC 0/4] iomap: zero range folio batch processing prototype Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-20 14:29   ` Brian Foster
2024-11-21  5:50     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zz3yUlYfrqAKiwbV@bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox