public inbox for linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] iomap: lift zeroed mapping handling into iomap_zero_range()
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 08:59:29 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZzNfQYdn7az_mvN9@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241109030127.GB9421@frogsfrogsfrogs>

On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 07:01:27PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 07:42:44AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> > In preparation for special handling of subranges, lift the zeroed
> > mapping logic from the iterator into the caller. Since this puts the
> > pagecache dirty check and flushing in the same place, streamline the
> > comments a bit as well.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 64 +++++++++++++++---------------------------
> >  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> > index ef0b68bccbb6..a78b5b9b3df3 100644
> > --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> > +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> > @@ -1350,40 +1350,12 @@ static inline int iomap_zero_iter_flush_and_stale(struct iomap_iter *i)
> >  	return filemap_write_and_wait_range(mapping, i->pos, end);
> >  }
> >  
> > -static loff_t iomap_zero_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, bool *did_zero,
> > -		bool *range_dirty)
> > +static loff_t iomap_zero_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, bool *did_zero)
> >  {
> > -	const struct iomap *srcmap = iomap_iter_srcmap(iter);
> >  	loff_t pos = iter->pos;
> >  	loff_t length = iomap_length(iter);
> >  	loff_t written = 0;
> >  
> > -	/*
> > -	 * We must zero subranges of unwritten mappings that might be dirty in
> > -	 * pagecache from previous writes. We only know whether the entire range
> > -	 * was clean or not, however, and dirty folios may have been written
> > -	 * back or reclaimed at any point after mapping lookup.
> > -	 *
> > -	 * The easiest way to deal with this is to flush pagecache to trigger
> > -	 * any pending unwritten conversions and then grab the updated extents
> > -	 * from the fs. The flush may change the current mapping, so mark it
> > -	 * stale for the iterator to remap it for the next pass to handle
> > -	 * properly.
> > -	 *
> > -	 * Note that holes are treated the same as unwritten because zero range
> > -	 * is (ab)used for partial folio zeroing in some cases. Hole backed
> > -	 * post-eof ranges can be dirtied via mapped write and the flush
> > -	 * triggers writeback time post-eof zeroing.
> > -	 */
> > -	if (srcmap->type == IOMAP_HOLE || srcmap->type == IOMAP_UNWRITTEN) {
> > -		if (*range_dirty) {
> > -			*range_dirty = false;
> > -			return iomap_zero_iter_flush_and_stale(iter);
> > -		}
> > -		/* range is clean and already zeroed, nothing to do */
> > -		return length;
> > -	}
> > -
> >  	do {
> >  		struct folio *folio;
> >  		int status;
> > @@ -1433,24 +1405,32 @@ iomap_zero_range(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t len, bool *did_zero,
> >  	bool range_dirty;
> >  
> >  	/*
> > -	 * Zero range wants to skip pre-zeroed (i.e. unwritten) mappings, but
> > -	 * pagecache must be flushed to ensure stale data from previous
> > -	 * buffered writes is not exposed. A flush is only required for certain
> > -	 * types of mappings, but checking pagecache after mapping lookup is
> > -	 * racy with writeback and reclaim.
> > +	 * Zero range can skip mappings that are zero on disk so long as
> > +	 * pagecache is clean. If pagecache was dirty prior to zero range, the
> > +	 * mapping converts on writeback completion and so must be zeroed.
> >  	 *
> > -	 * Therefore, check the entire range first and pass along whether any
> > -	 * part of it is dirty. If so and an underlying mapping warrants it,
> > -	 * flush the cache at that point. This trades off the occasional false
> > -	 * positive (and spurious flush, if the dirty data and mapping don't
> > -	 * happen to overlap) for simplicity in handling a relatively uncommon
> > -	 * situation.
> > +	 * The simplest way to deal with this across a range is to flush
> > +	 * pagecache and process the updated mappings. To avoid an unconditional
> > +	 * flush, check pagecache state and only flush if dirty and the fs
> > +	 * returns a mapping that might convert on writeback.
> >  	 */
> >  	range_dirty = filemap_range_needs_writeback(inode->i_mapping,
> >  					pos, pos + len - 1);
> > +	while ((ret = iomap_iter(&iter, ops)) > 0) {
> > +		const struct iomap *s = iomap_iter_srcmap(&iter);
> > +
> > +		if (s->type == IOMAP_HOLE || s->type == IOMAP_UNWRITTEN) {
> > +			loff_t p = iomap_length(&iter);
> 
> Another dumb nit: blank line after the declaration.
> 

Fixed.

> With that fixed, this is ok by me for further testing:
> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> 

Thanks.

Brian

> --D
> 
> > +			if (range_dirty) {
> > +				range_dirty = false;
> > +				p = iomap_zero_iter_flush_and_stale(&iter);
> > +			}
> > +			iter.processed = p;
> > +			continue;
> > +		}
> >  
> > -	while ((ret = iomap_iter(&iter, ops)) > 0)
> > -		iter.processed = iomap_zero_iter(&iter, did_zero, &range_dirty);
> > +		iter.processed = iomap_zero_iter(&iter, did_zero);
> > +	}
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iomap_zero_range);
> > -- 
> > 2.47.0
> > 
> > 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-12 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-08 12:42 [PATCH v3 0/4] iomap: zero range flush fixes Brian Foster
2024-11-08 12:42 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] iomap: reset per-iter state on non-error iter advances Brian Foster
2024-11-09  3:00   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-11  5:53   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-12 13:59     ` Brian Foster
2024-11-08 12:42 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] iomap: lift zeroed mapping handling into iomap_zero_range() Brian Foster
2024-11-09  3:01   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-12 13:59     ` Brian Foster [this message]
2024-11-11  6:03   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-12 14:00     ` Brian Foster
2024-11-15 14:53       ` Brian Foster
2024-11-15 17:02         ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-15 19:31           ` Brian Foster
2024-11-08 12:42 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] iomap: elide flush from partial eof zero range Brian Foster
2024-11-09  3:03   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-11  6:06   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-08 12:42 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] iomap: warn on zero range of a post-eof folio Brian Foster
2024-11-09  3:06   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-12 14:01     ` Brian Foster
2024-11-11  6:06   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZzNfQYdn7az_mvN9@bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox