linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Cc: oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com,
	feng.tang@intel.com, fengwei.yin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [axboe-block:xfs-async-dio] [fs] f9f8b03900: stress-ng.msg.ops_per_sec 29.3% improvement
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 11:01:12 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a2a6e445-1cbd-1c28-af60-3e449f9673ea@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <029f3c86-c206-0ad5-9c42-04ea0b683367@kernel.dk>

On 8/2/23 10:38?AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 8/2/23 7:52?AM, kernel test robot wrote:
>>
>> hi, Jens Axboe,
>>
>> though all results in below formal report are improvement, Fengwei (CCed)
>> checked on another Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6336Y CPU @ 2.40GHz (Ice Lake)
>> (sorry, since this machine doesn't belong to our team, we cannot intergrate
>> the results in our report, only can heads-up you here), and found ~30%
>> stress-ng.msg.ops_per_sec regression.
>>
>> but by disable the TRACEPOINT, the regression will disappear.
>>
>> Fengwei also tried to remove following section from the patch:
>> @@ -351,7 +361,8 @@ enum rw_hint {
>>  	{ IOCB_WRITE,		"WRITE" }, \
>>  	{ IOCB_WAITQ,		"WAITQ" }, \
>>  	{ IOCB_NOIO,		"NOIO" }, \
>> -	{ IOCB_ALLOC_CACHE,	"ALLOC_CACHE" }
>> +	{ IOCB_ALLOC_CACHE,	"ALLOC_CACHE" }, \
>> +	{ IOCB_DIO_DEFER,	"DIO_DEFER" }
>>
>> the regression is also gone.
>>
>> Fengwei also mentioned to us that his understanding is this code update changed
>> the data section layout of the kernel. Otherwise, it's hard to explain the
>> regression/improvement this commit could bring.
>>
>> these information and below formal report FYI.
> 
> Very funky. I ran this on my 256 thread box, and removing the
> IOCB_DIO_DEFER (which is now IOCB_CALLER_COMP) trace point definition, I
> get:
> 
> stress-ng: metrc: [4148] stressor       bogo ops real time  usr time  sys time   bogo ops/s     bogo ops/s
> stress-ng: metrc: [4148]                           (secs)    (secs)    (secs)   (real time) (usr+sys time)
> stress-ng: metrc: [4148] msg           1626997107     60.61    171.63   4003.65  26845470.19      389673.05
> 
> and with it being the way it is in the branch:
> 
> stress-ng: metrc: [3678] stressor       bogo ops real time  usr time  sys time   bogo ops/s     bogo ops/s
> stress-ng: metrc: [3678]                           (secs)    (secs)    (secs)   (real time) (usr+sys time)
> stress-ng: metrc: [3678] msg           1287795248     61.25    140.26   3755.50  21025449.92      330563.24
> 
> which is about a -21% bogo ops drop. Then I got a bit suspicious since
> the previous strings fit in 64 bytes, and now they don't, and I simply
> shortened the names so they still fit, as per below patch. With that,
> the regression there is reclaimed.
> 
> That's as far as I've gotten yet, but I'm guessing we end up placing it
> differently, maybe now overlapping with data that is dirtied? I didn't
> profile it very much, just for an overview, and there's really nothing
> to observe there. The task and system is clearly more idle when the
> regression hits.

Better variant here. I did confirm via System.map that layout
drastically changes when we use more than 64 bytes of string data. I'm
suspecting your test is sensitive to this and it may not mean more than
the fact that this test is a bit fragile like that, but let me know how
it works for you with the below.


diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 1e6dbe309d52..487ef4ae7267 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -353,20 +353,24 @@ enum rw_hint {
  */
 #define IOCB_DIO_CALLER_COMP	(1 << 22)
 
-/* for use in trace events */
+/*
+ * For use in trace events - keep the text sizes descriptions small, as it
+ * seems layout drastically changes if we have more than 64 bytes of total
+ * text in here.
+ */
 #define TRACE_IOCB_STRINGS \
-	{ IOCB_HIPRI,		"HIPRI" }, \
+	{ IOCB_HIPRI,		"PRI" }, \
 	{ IOCB_DSYNC,		"DSYNC" }, \
 	{ IOCB_SYNC,		"SYNC" }, \
-	{ IOCB_NOWAIT,		"NOWAIT" }, \
-	{ IOCB_APPEND,		"APPEND" }, \
-	{ IOCB_EVENTFD,		"EVENTFD"}, \
+	{ IOCB_NOWAIT,		"NWAIT" }, \
+	{ IOCB_APPEND,		"APND" }, \
+	{ IOCB_EVENTFD,		"EVFD"}, \
 	{ IOCB_DIRECT,		"DIRECT" }, \
 	{ IOCB_WRITE,		"WRITE" }, \
 	{ IOCB_WAITQ,		"WAITQ" }, \
 	{ IOCB_NOIO,		"NOIO" }, \
-	{ IOCB_ALLOC_CACHE,	"ALLOC_CACHE" }, \
-	{ IOCB_DIO_CALLER_COMP,	"CALLER_COMP" }
+	{ IOCB_ALLOC_CACHE,	"ACACHE" }, \
+	{ IOCB_DIO_CALLER_COMP,	"CCOMP" }
 
 struct kiocb {
 	struct file		*ki_filp;
 

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-02 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-02 13:52 [axboe-block:xfs-async-dio] [fs] f9f8b03900: stress-ng.msg.ops_per_sec 29.3% improvement kernel test robot
2023-08-02 16:38 ` Jens Axboe
2023-08-02 17:01   ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2023-08-02 17:31     ` Jens Axboe
2023-08-03  1:47       ` Yin Fengwei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a2a6e445-1cbd-1c28-af60-3e449f9673ea@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).