From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Ulrich Drepper" Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2 Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:44:47 -0700 Message-ID: References: <44C8F8F3.2090606@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Pekka J Enberg" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, tytso@mit.edu, tigran@veritas.com Return-path: Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.172]:36374 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750969AbWG0Rot (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:44:49 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m3so394391ugc for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:44:47 -0700 (PDT) To: "H. Peter Anvin" In-Reply-To: <44C8F8F3.2090606@zytor.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On 7/27/06, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > No need to add sys_revoke. Of course not. I didn't imply that. sys_revokeat is all that's needed. I just provided the other name to make clear they are equivalent wrt to the file name property. Not everyone knows the *at functions.