From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Ulrich Drepper" Subject: Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 07:29:23 -0800 Message-ID: References: <20070117094658.GA17390@amitarora.in.ibm.com> <20070225022326.137b4875.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070301183445.GA7911@amitarora.in.ibm.com> <45E7BE4B.5070602@us.ibm.com> <20070301221652.2aa3e973.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1172841831.7992.14.camel@kleikamp.austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Andrew Morton" , "Badari Pulavarty" , "Amit K. Arora" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, suparna@in.ibm.com, cmm@us.ibm.com, alex@clusterfs.com, suzuki@in.ibm.com To: "Dave Kleikamp" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1172841831.7992.14.camel@kleikamp.austin.ibm.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On 3/2/07, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > Then there's no need for sys_allocate to return a long. Every syscall must return a long. Otherwise you can have problems on 64-bit archs.