From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Ulrich Drepper" Subject: Re: [d_path 0/7] Fixes to d_path: Respin Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 08:24:17 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20070412090809.917795000@suse.de> <200704201345.09858.agruen@suse.de> <200704201721.29825.agruen@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Alan Cox" , jjohansen@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, chrisw@sous-sol.org, "Andrew Morton" To: "Andreas Gruenbacher" Return-path: Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.226]:28080 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2992923AbXDTPYT (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:24:19 -0400 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 76so957579wra for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 08:24:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200704201721.29825.agruen@suse.de> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On 4/20/07, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > Yes, that one, sorry. The values it obtains that way are not reliable. Why should the mount point info together with the filesystem type not be reliable? You're trying to find an excuse to break tings, that seems all there is.