From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Van Hensbergen Subject: Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits) Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 14:29:14 -0500 Message-ID: References: <3Ki1W-2pt-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <3S8oN-So-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <3S8oN-So-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <3S8oM-So-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <3UmnD-6Fy-7@gated-at.bofh.it> Reply-To: Eric Van Hensbergen Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: Miklos Szeredi , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, akpm@osdl.org, viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk Return-path: Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.205]:46036 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261637AbVDST3R convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2005 15:29:17 -0400 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so1922562wri for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:29:15 -0700 (PDT) To: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Somewhat related question for Viro/the group: Why is CLONE_NEWNS considered a priveledged operation? Would placing limits on the number of private namespaces a user can own solve any resource concerns or is there something more nefarious I'm missing?