From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Van Hensbergen Subject: Re: [RFC][2.6 patch] Allow creation of new namespaces during mount system call Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 08:55:12 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20050419222324.GM13052@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20050420033304.GO13052@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Reply-To: Eric Van Hensbergen Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.195]:13379 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261624AbVDTNz1 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Apr 2005 09:55:27 -0400 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 57so252476wri for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 06:55:23 -0700 (PDT) To: Al Viro In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On 4/20/05, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote: > > Yeah, that was really slimy, just wanted something that would be more > accessible to end users without having to affect changes to lots of > applications. A somewhat less slimy method would be to expose > something in /proc, but I suppose that is a much more theologically > charged option. > I take it back, the more I think about it /proc is even more slimy. Forget I said it. -eric