From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][2.6 patch] Allow creation of new namespaces during mount system call
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 13:18:14 -0500
Message-ID: <a4e6962a05042011184666e275@mail.gmail.com>
References: <a4e6962a05041915132f57de3f@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20050420033304.GO13052@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
	 <20050420094558.GB10167@mail.shareable.org>
	 <20050420102711.GR13052@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
	 <20050420120340.GC10167@mail.shareable.org>
	 <20050420123945.GS13052@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
	 <1114015886.4920.120.camel@localhost>
	 <20050420170921.GT13052@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
	 <E1DOJNo-00023E-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
	 <a4e6962a0504201107518416e9@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.192]:57278 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261784AbVDTSSQ convert rfc822-to-8bit
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 20 Apr 2005 14:18:16 -0400
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so239449wri
        for <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 11:18:15 -0700 (PDT)
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <a4e6962a0504201107518416e9@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On 4/20/05, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote:
>
> The user expects to have the see the same files in all sessions,
> whether those be local logins, remote logins, ftp/scp/etc sessions.
>
>
> A single global namespace makes perfect sense here.  Why do people
> want private namespaces?
>

I disagree with this, I think there are plenty of situations where I
may want to have several different namespaces for several different
sessions.  Once you unlock namespace manipulation for users, all sorts
of new models of how to interact with the system fall out of that
capability.

Not to mention the fact that if you accidentally screw up your private
name space, fixing it is as easy as exiting that shell (or closing
that window, etc.)  Could you imagine if your PATH environment
variable was shared between all your shells and logins?  A simple typo
when extending your PATH in a single shell would screw all your
sessions.

                  -eric