From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: oddity in v9fs_kill_super()
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 13:55:57 -0500
Message-ID: <a4e6962a0905111155h4b575a70o8453938e53b88e3d@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20090506175906.GW8633@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.251]:28156 "EHLO
	an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752872AbZEKSz5 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 11 May 2009 14:55:57 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20090506175906.GW8633@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> Is there any reason to do v9fs_dentry_release(s->s_root) in ->kill_sb()?
> It is called when root dentry is freed and it will be freed just fine...
>

Most likely unnecessary early paranoia on my part - I think that's
been in there since 2.6.14.
I'll look into removing it.

        -eric