Re: 回复: HFS/HFS+ maintainership action items

[Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>]

Hi Yangtao,

On Fri, 2025-04-25 at 10:17 +0000, 李扬韬 wrote:
> Hi Slava,
> 
> > So, we need at first to check these issues. And it's a lot of work. :)
> 
> That's a lot of test failures, probably many for the same reason.
> 

Probably, yes, but we need to check it. If it is one or several root causes,
then we are lucky. :)

> Are there any changes to xfstest? Has this been sent to the fstest mailing list?
> 

This is a generic test cases and other file systems can pass it. For example, I
can pass xfstests for CephFS kernel client. So, we must think now that it is
HFS/HFS+ issues until we can prove the opposite one.

> I'm also planning to start deploying a local xfstest environment. : )
> 

Sounds great! I think we will need to distribute test-cases check to avoid the
duplication of efforts.

Thanks,
Slava.