From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
To: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
Linux Regressions <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: next-20250626: WARNING fs jbd2 transaction.c start_this_handle with ARM64_64K_PAGES
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 13:03:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a5726ab3-99ed-430a-a883-d04e972b6e76@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5db1e0c2-a192-4883-9535-dd269efdff74@gmail.com>
On 2025/7/7 9:43, Joseph Qi wrote:
>
>
> On 2025/7/5 15:10, Zhang Yi wrote:
>> On 2025/7/3 18:47, Joseph Qi wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2025/7/3 15:26, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 at 19:23, Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi, Naresh!
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2025/6/26 20:31, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>>>>>> Regressions noticed on arm64 devices while running LTP syscalls mmap16
>>>>>> test case on the Linux next-20250616..next-20250626 with the extra build
>>>>>> config fragment CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES=y the kernel warning noticed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not reproducible with 4K page size.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Test environments:
>>>>>> - Dragonboard-410c
>>>>>> - Juno-r2
>>>>>> - rk3399-rock-pi-4b
>>>>>> - qemu-arm64
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regression Analysis:
>>>>>> - New regression? Yes
>>>>>> - Reproducibility? Yes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Test regression: next-20250626 LTP mmap16 WARNING fs jbd2
>>>>>> transaction.c start_this_handle
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for the report. The block size for this test is 1 KB, so I
>>>>> suspect this is the issue with insufficient journal credits that we
>>>>> are going to resolve.
>>>>
>>>> I have applied your patch set [1] and tested and the reported
>>>> regressions did not fix.
>>>> Am I missing anything ?
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20250611111625.1668035-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com/
>>>>
>>>
>>> I can also reproduce the similar warning with xfstests generic/730 under
>>> 64k page size + 4k block size.
>>>
>>
>> Hi, Joseph!
>>
>> I cannot reproduce this issue on my machine. Theoretically, the 'rsv_credits'
>> should be 113 under 64k page size + 4k block size, I don't think it would
>> exceed the max user trans buffers. Could you please give more details?
>> What is the configuration of your xfstests? and what does the specific error
>> log look like?
>>
> I'm testing on arm 64K ECS with xfstests local.config as follows:
>
> export TEST_DEV=/dev/nvme1n1p1
> export TEST_DIR=/mnt/test
> export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/nvme1n1p2
> export SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt/scratch
> > Each disk part is 250G and formated with 4k block size.
>
> The dmesg shows the following warning:
>
> [ 137.174661] JBD2: kworker/u32:0 wants too many credits credits:32 rsv_credits:1577 max:2695
> ...
> [ 137.175544] Call trace:
> [ 137.175545] start_this_handle+0x3bc/0x3d8 (P)
> [ 137.175548] jbd2__journal_start+0x10c/0x248
> [ 137.175550] __ext4_journal_start_sb+0xe4/0x1b0
> [ 137.175553] ext4_do_writepages+0x430/0x768
> [ 137.175556] ext4_writepages+0x8c/0x118
> [ 137.175558] do_writepages+0xac/0x180
> [ 137.175561] __writeback_single_inode+0x48/0x328
> [ 137.175563] writeback_sb_inodes+0x244/0x4a0
> [ 137.175564] wb_writeback+0xec/0x3a0
> [ 137.175566] wb_do_writeback+0xc0/0x250
> [ 137.175568] wb_workfn+0x70/0x1b0
> [ 137.175570] process_one_work+0x180/0x400
> [ 137.175573] worker_thread+0x254/0x2c8
> [ 137.175575] kthread+0x124/0x130
> [ 137.175577] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
> ...
OK, well. Since you did not specifically set MKFS_OPTIONS="-b 4096, the
generic/730 will use scsi_debug to create a file system image with a size of
256MB, a block size of 1KB, and a log size of 8MB. Consequently, the issue
did not actually occur in a 4KB block size environment, so the root cause
is the same as Naresh's report.
Thanks,
Yi.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-07 5:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-26 12:31 next-20250626: WARNING fs jbd2 transaction.c start_this_handle with ARM64_64K_PAGES Naresh Kamboju
2025-06-26 13:52 ` Zhang Yi
2025-07-03 7:26 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-07-03 10:47 ` Joseph Qi
2025-07-05 7:10 ` Zhang Yi
2025-07-07 1:43 ` Joseph Qi
2025-07-07 5:03 ` Zhang Yi [this message]
2025-07-03 11:33 ` Zhang Yi
2025-07-04 11:17 ` Jan Kara
2025-07-07 4:54 ` Zhang Yi
2025-07-07 8:16 ` Jan Kara
2025-07-08 2:11 ` Zhang Yi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a5726ab3-99ed-430a-a883-d04e972b6e76@huaweicloud.com \
--to=yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=anders.roxell@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jiangqi903@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).