From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@centrum.cz>
Subject: Re: UnionMount status?
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:28:14 +0100
Message-ID: <a5d587fb1003191328w539ec12eh7e75cbec942ac485@mail.gmail.com>
References: <a5d587fb1003181721m49d2debey48c6a6acc326a9a6@mail.gmail.com>
	<17402.1268979040@jrobl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, vaurora@redhat.com
To: "J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-fx0-f219.google.com ([209.85.220.219]:36939 "EHLO
	mail-fx0-f219.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751622Ab0CSU2g (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:28:36 -0400
Received: by fxm19 with SMTP id 19so997102fxm.21
        for <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <17402.1268979040@jrobl>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On 19 March 2010 07:10, J. R. Okajima <hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp> wrote:
>
> Michal Suchanek:
>> I was wondering in what state is the Linux UnionMount. As all other
>> union solutions were rejected from the kernel so far the development
>> on them is stagnating and it's not exactly easy to get them patched on
>> top of new kernels.
>
> As far as I know, the development on aufs (one of other union solution)
> is not stagnating, and you can easily apply it against the latest -rc
> kernel.
> But it never means to keep Val's UnionMount from mainlining.

You are right, the latest aufs patch applies cleanly and compiles on
top of 2.6.34-rc1.

Thanks

Michal