From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] iomap: rework iomap_write_begin() to return folio offset and length
Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 09:18:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBTGMGWjnVZ3lP4d@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250501222229.GL25675@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 03:22:29PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 03:01:12PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > iomap_write_begin() returns a folio based on current pos and
> > remaining length in the iter, and each caller then trims the
> > pos/length to the given folio. Clean this up a bit and let
> > iomap_write_begin() return the trimmed range along with the folio.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> > index d3b30ebad9ea..2fde268c39fc 100644
> > --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> > +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> > @@ -793,15 +793,22 @@ static int iomap_write_begin_inline(const struct iomap_iter *iter,
> > return iomap_read_inline_data(iter, folio);
> > }
> >
> > -static int iomap_write_begin(struct iomap_iter *iter, size_t len,
> > - struct folio **foliop)
> > +/*
> > + * Grab and prepare a folio for write based on iter state. Returns the folio,
> > + * offset, and length. Callers can optionally pass a max length *plen,
> > + * otherwise init to zero.
> > + */
> > +static int iomap_write_begin(struct iomap_iter *iter, struct folio **foliop,
> > + size_t *poffset, u64 *plen)
>
> Hmm, is this offset and length supposed to be bytes within the folio?
> I find it a little odd that plen would be a u64 then, unless we're
> preparing for folios that huge? Or is that just to avoid integer
> truncation issues?
>
It was more the latter.. it's an input/output param for callers that use
iomap_length(). That returns a u64, so just trying to keep things
consistent. I suppose we could break the function decl into one param
per line with "in/out" type comments if you think that is useful..?
Brian
> --D
>
> > {
> > const struct iomap_folio_ops *folio_ops = iter->iomap.folio_ops;
> > const struct iomap *srcmap = iomap_iter_srcmap(iter);
> > loff_t pos = iter->pos;
> > + u64 len = min_t(u64, SIZE_MAX, iomap_length(iter));
> > struct folio *folio;
> > int status = 0;
> >
> > + len = *plen > 0 ? min_t(u64, len, *plen) : len;
> > BUG_ON(pos + len > iter->iomap.offset + iter->iomap.length);
> > if (srcmap != &iter->iomap)
> > BUG_ON(pos + len > srcmap->offset + srcmap->length);
> > @@ -833,8 +840,7 @@ static int iomap_write_begin(struct iomap_iter *iter, size_t len,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > - if (pos + len > folio_pos(folio) + folio_size(folio))
> > - len = folio_pos(folio) + folio_size(folio) - pos;
> > + pos = iomap_trim_folio_range(iter, folio, poffset, &len);
> >
> > if (srcmap->type == IOMAP_INLINE)
> > status = iomap_write_begin_inline(iter, folio);
> > @@ -847,6 +853,7 @@ static int iomap_write_begin(struct iomap_iter *iter, size_t len,
> > goto out_unlock;
> >
> > *foliop = folio;
> > + *plen = len;
> > return 0;
> >
> > out_unlock:
> > @@ -967,7 +974,7 @@ static int iomap_write_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, struct iov_iter *i)
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > - status = iomap_write_begin(iter, bytes, &folio);
> > + status = iomap_write_begin(iter, &folio, &offset, &bytes);
> > if (unlikely(status)) {
> > iomap_write_failed(iter->inode, iter->pos, bytes);
> > break;
> > @@ -975,7 +982,7 @@ static int iomap_write_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, struct iov_iter *i)
> > if (iter->iomap.flags & IOMAP_F_STALE)
> > break;
> >
> > - pos = iomap_trim_folio_range(iter, folio, &offset, &bytes);
> > + pos = iter->pos;
> >
> > if (mapping_writably_mapped(mapping))
> > flush_dcache_folio(folio);
> > @@ -1295,14 +1302,12 @@ static int iomap_unshare_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter)
> > bool ret;
> >
> > bytes = min_t(u64, SIZE_MAX, bytes);
> > - status = iomap_write_begin(iter, bytes, &folio);
> > + status = iomap_write_begin(iter, &folio, &offset, &bytes);
> > if (unlikely(status))
> > return status;
> > if (iomap->flags & IOMAP_F_STALE)
> > break;
> >
> > - iomap_trim_folio_range(iter, folio, &offset, &bytes);
> > -
> > ret = iomap_write_end(iter, bytes, bytes, folio);
> > __iomap_put_folio(iter, bytes, folio);
> > if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ret))
> > @@ -1367,7 +1372,7 @@ static int iomap_zero_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, bool *did_zero)
> > bool ret;
> >
> > bytes = min_t(u64, SIZE_MAX, bytes);
> > - status = iomap_write_begin(iter, bytes, &folio);
> > + status = iomap_write_begin(iter, &folio, &offset, &bytes);
> > if (status)
> > return status;
> > if (iter->iomap.flags & IOMAP_F_STALE)
> > @@ -1376,7 +1381,6 @@ static int iomap_zero_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, bool *did_zero)
> > /* warn about zeroing folios beyond eof that won't write back */
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_pos(folio) > iter->inode->i_size);
> >
> > - iomap_trim_folio_range(iter, folio, &offset, &bytes);
> > folio_zero_range(folio, offset, bytes);
> > folio_mark_accessed(folio);
> >
> > --
> > 2.49.0
> >
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-02 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-30 19:01 [PATCH 0/6] iomap: misc buffered write path cleanups and prep Brian Foster
2025-04-30 19:01 ` [PATCH 1/6] iomap: resample iter->pos after iomap_write_begin() calls Brian Foster
2025-05-05 9:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-30 19:01 ` [PATCH 2/6] iomap: drop unnecessary pos param from iomap_write_[begin|end] Brian Foster
2025-05-01 22:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-05-05 9:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-30 19:01 ` [PATCH 3/6] iomap: drop pos param from __iomap_[get|put]_folio() Brian Foster
2025-05-01 22:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-05-05 9:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-30 19:01 ` [PATCH 4/6] iomap: helper to trim pos/bytes to within folio Brian Foster
2025-05-05 9:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-05-05 14:38 ` Brian Foster
2025-04-30 19:01 ` [PATCH 5/6] iomap: push non-large folio check into get folio path Brian Foster
2025-05-05 9:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-30 19:01 ` [PATCH 6/6] iomap: rework iomap_write_begin() to return folio offset and length Brian Foster
2025-05-01 22:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-05-02 13:18 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2025-05-02 19:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-05-02 20:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-05-05 14:39 ` Brian Foster
2025-05-05 9:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-05-05 14:39 ` Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aBTGMGWjnVZ3lP4d@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).