From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, hch@infradead.org, willy@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] iomap: optional zero range dirty folio processing
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 08:35:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aHZK95s-7ZYa4sqB@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250715052259.GO2672049@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 10:22:59PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 04:41:18PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > The only way zero range can currently process unwritten mappings
> > with dirty pagecache is to check whether the range is dirty before
> > mapping lookup and then flush when at least one underlying mapping
> > is unwritten. This ordering is required to prevent iomap lookup from
> > racing with folio writeback and reclaim.
> >
> > Since zero range can skip ranges of unwritten mappings that are
> > clean in cache, this operation can be improved by allowing the
> > filesystem to provide a set of dirty folios that require zeroing. In
> > turn, rather than flush or iterate file offsets, zero range can
> > iterate on folios in the batch and advance over clean or uncached
> > ranges in between.
> >
> > Add a folio_batch in struct iomap and provide a helper for fs' to
>
> /me confused by the single quote; is this supposed to read:
>
> "...for the fs to populate..."?
>
Eh, I intended it to read "for filesystems to populate." I'll change it
to that locally.
Brian
> Either way the code changes look like a reasonable thing to do for the
> pagecache (try to grab a bunch of dirty folios while XFS holds the
> mapping lock) so
>
> Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
>
> --D
>
>
> > populate the batch at lookup time. Update the folio lookup path to
> > return the next folio in the batch, if provided, and advance the
> > iter if the folio starts beyond the current offset.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > ---
> > fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > fs/iomap/iter.c | 6 +++
> > include/linux/iomap.h | 4 ++
> > 3 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> > index 38da2fa6e6b0..194e3cc0857f 100644
> > --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> > +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> > @@ -750,6 +750,28 @@ static struct folio *__iomap_get_folio(struct iomap_iter *iter, size_t len)
> > if (!mapping_large_folio_support(iter->inode->i_mapping))
> > len = min_t(size_t, len, PAGE_SIZE - offset_in_page(pos));
> >
> > + if (iter->fbatch) {
> > + struct folio *folio = folio_batch_next(iter->fbatch);
> > +
> > + if (!folio)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * The folio mapping generally shouldn't have changed based on
> > + * fs locks, but be consistent with filemap lookup and retry
> > + * the iter if it does.
> > + */
> > + folio_lock(folio);
> > + if (unlikely(folio->mapping != iter->inode->i_mapping)) {
> > + iter->iomap.flags |= IOMAP_F_STALE;
> > + folio_unlock(folio);
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + folio_get(folio);
> > + return folio;
> > + }
> > +
> > if (folio_ops && folio_ops->get_folio)
> > return folio_ops->get_folio(iter, pos, len);
> > else
> > @@ -811,6 +833,8 @@ static int iomap_write_begin(struct iomap_iter *iter, struct folio **foliop,
> > int status = 0;
> >
> > len = min_not_zero(len, *plen);
> > + *foliop = NULL;
> > + *plen = 0;
> >
> > if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
> > return -EINTR;
> > @@ -819,6 +843,15 @@ static int iomap_write_begin(struct iomap_iter *iter, struct folio **foliop,
> > if (IS_ERR(folio))
> > return PTR_ERR(folio);
> >
> > + /*
> > + * No folio means we're done with a batch. We still have range to
> > + * process so return and let the caller iterate and refill the batch.
> > + */
> > + if (!folio) {
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(!iter->fbatch);
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > /*
> > * Now we have a locked folio, before we do anything with it we need to
> > * check that the iomap we have cached is not stale. The inode extent
> > @@ -839,6 +872,21 @@ static int iomap_write_begin(struct iomap_iter *iter, struct folio **foliop,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + /*
> > + * The folios in a batch may not be contiguous. If we've skipped
> > + * forward, advance the iter to the pos of the current folio. If the
> > + * folio starts beyond the end of the mapping, it may have been trimmed
> > + * since the lookup for whatever reason. Return a NULL folio to
> > + * terminate the op.
> > + */
> > + if (folio_pos(folio) > iter->pos) {
> > + len = min_t(u64, folio_pos(folio) - iter->pos,
> > + iomap_length(iter));
> > + status = iomap_iter_advance(iter, &len);
> > + if (status || !len)
> > + goto out_unlock;
> > + }
> > +
> > pos = iomap_trim_folio_range(iter, folio, poffset, &len);
> >
> > if (srcmap->type == IOMAP_INLINE)
> > @@ -1377,6 +1425,12 @@ static int iomap_zero_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, bool *did_zero)
> > if (iter->iomap.flags & IOMAP_F_STALE)
> > break;
> >
> > + /* a NULL folio means we're done with a folio batch */
> > + if (!folio) {
> > + status = iomap_iter_advance_full(iter);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > /* warn about zeroing folios beyond eof that won't write back */
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_pos(folio) > iter->inode->i_size);
> >
> > @@ -1398,6 +1452,26 @@ static int iomap_zero_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, bool *did_zero)
> > return status;
> > }
> >
> > +loff_t
> > +iomap_fill_dirty_folios(
> > + struct iomap_iter *iter,
> > + loff_t offset,
> > + loff_t length)
> > +{
> > + struct address_space *mapping = iter->inode->i_mapping;
> > + pgoff_t start = offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > + pgoff_t end = (offset + length - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > +
> > + iter->fbatch = kmalloc(sizeof(struct folio_batch), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!iter->fbatch)
> > + return offset + length;
> > + folio_batch_init(iter->fbatch);
> > +
> > + filemap_get_folios_dirty(mapping, &start, end, iter->fbatch);
> > + return (start << PAGE_SHIFT);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iomap_fill_dirty_folios);
> > +
> > int
> > iomap_zero_range(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t len, bool *did_zero,
> > const struct iomap_ops *ops, void *private)
> > @@ -1426,7 +1500,7 @@ iomap_zero_range(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t len, bool *did_zero,
> > * flushing on partial eof zeroing, special case it to zero the
> > * unaligned start portion if already dirty in pagecache.
> > */
> > - if (off &&
> > + if (!iter.fbatch && off &&
> > filemap_range_needs_writeback(mapping, pos, pos + plen - 1)) {
> > iter.len = plen;
> > while ((ret = iomap_iter(&iter, ops)) > 0)
> > @@ -1442,13 +1516,18 @@ iomap_zero_range(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t len, bool *did_zero,
> > * if dirty and the fs returns a mapping that might convert on
> > * writeback.
> > */
> > - range_dirty = filemap_range_needs_writeback(inode->i_mapping,
> > - iter.pos, iter.pos + iter.len - 1);
> > + range_dirty = filemap_range_needs_writeback(mapping, iter.pos,
> > + iter.pos + iter.len - 1);
> > while ((ret = iomap_iter(&iter, ops)) > 0) {
> > const struct iomap *srcmap = iomap_iter_srcmap(&iter);
> >
> > - if (srcmap->type == IOMAP_HOLE ||
> > - srcmap->type == IOMAP_UNWRITTEN) {
> > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(iter.fbatch &&
> > + srcmap->type != IOMAP_UNWRITTEN))
> > + return -EIO;
> > +
> > + if (!iter.fbatch &&
> > + (srcmap->type == IOMAP_HOLE ||
> > + srcmap->type == IOMAP_UNWRITTEN)) {
> > s64 status;
> >
> > if (range_dirty) {
> > diff --git a/fs/iomap/iter.c b/fs/iomap/iter.c
> > index 6ffc6a7b9ba5..89bd5951a6fd 100644
> > --- a/fs/iomap/iter.c
> > +++ b/fs/iomap/iter.c
> > @@ -9,6 +9,12 @@
> >
> > static inline void iomap_iter_reset_iomap(struct iomap_iter *iter)
> > {
> > + if (iter->fbatch) {
> > + folio_batch_release(iter->fbatch);
> > + kfree(iter->fbatch);
> > + iter->fbatch = NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > iter->status = 0;
> > memset(&iter->iomap, 0, sizeof(iter->iomap));
> > memset(&iter->srcmap, 0, sizeof(iter->srcmap));
> > diff --git a/include/linux/iomap.h b/include/linux/iomap.h
> > index 522644d62f30..0b9b460b2873 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/iomap.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/iomap.h
> > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> > #include <linux/types.h>
> > #include <linux/mm_types.h>
> > #include <linux/blkdev.h>
> > +#include <linux/pagevec.h>
> >
> > struct address_space;
> > struct fiemap_extent_info;
> > @@ -239,6 +240,7 @@ struct iomap_iter {
> > unsigned flags;
> > struct iomap iomap;
> > struct iomap srcmap;
> > + struct folio_batch *fbatch;
> > void *private;
> > };
> >
> > @@ -345,6 +347,8 @@ void iomap_invalidate_folio(struct folio *folio, size_t offset, size_t len);
> > bool iomap_dirty_folio(struct address_space *mapping, struct folio *folio);
> > int iomap_file_unshare(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t len,
> > const struct iomap_ops *ops);
> > +loff_t iomap_fill_dirty_folios(struct iomap_iter *iter, loff_t offset,
> > + loff_t length);
> > int iomap_zero_range(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t len,
> > bool *did_zero, const struct iomap_ops *ops, void *private);
> > int iomap_truncate_page(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, bool *did_zero,
> > --
> > 2.50.0
> >
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-15 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-14 20:41 [PATCH v3 0/7] iomap: zero range folio batch support Brian Foster
2025-07-14 20:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] filemap: add helper to look up dirty folios in a range Brian Foster
2025-07-15 5:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-14 20:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] iomap: remove pos+len BUG_ON() to after folio lookup Brian Foster
2025-07-15 5:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-14 20:41 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] iomap: optional zero range dirty folio processing Brian Foster
2025-07-15 5:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-15 12:35 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2025-07-18 11:30 ` Zhang Yi
2025-07-18 13:48 ` Brian Foster
2025-07-19 11:07 ` Zhang Yi
2025-07-21 8:47 ` Zhang Yi
2025-07-28 12:57 ` Zhang Yi
2025-07-30 13:19 ` Brian Foster
2025-08-02 7:26 ` Zhang Yi
2025-07-30 13:17 ` Brian Foster
2025-08-02 7:19 ` Zhang Yi
2025-08-05 13:08 ` Brian Foster
2025-08-06 3:10 ` Zhang Yi
2025-08-06 13:25 ` Brian Foster
2025-08-07 4:58 ` Zhang Yi
2025-07-14 20:41 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] xfs: always trim mapping to requested range for zero range Brian Foster
2025-07-14 20:41 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] xfs: fill dirty folios on zero range of unwritten mappings Brian Foster
2025-07-15 5:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-15 12:35 ` Brian Foster
2025-07-15 14:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-14 20:41 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] iomap: remove old partial eof zeroing optimization Brian Foster
2025-07-15 5:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-15 12:36 ` Brian Foster
2025-07-15 14:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-15 16:20 ` Brian Foster
2025-07-15 16:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-14 20:41 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] xfs: error tag to force zeroing on debug kernels Brian Foster
2025-07-15 5:24 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-15 12:39 ` Brian Foster
2025-07-15 14:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-15 16:20 ` Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aHZK95s-7ZYa4sqB@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).