From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, dw@davidwei.uk,
brauner@kernel.org, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] iov_iter: remove iov_iter_is_aligned
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 22:02:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aI1xySNUdQ2B0dbJ@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250801234736.1913170-8-kbusch@meta.com>
On Fri, Aug 01, 2025 at 04:47:36PM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
>
> No more callers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
You had me up until this last patch.
I'm actually making use of iov_iter_is_aligned() in a series of
changes for both NFS and NFSD. Chuck has included some of the
NFSD changes in his nfsd-testing branch, see:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cel/linux.git/commit/?h=nfsd-testing&id=5d78ac1e674b45f9c9e3769b48efb27c44f4e4d3
And the balance of my work that is pending review/inclusion is:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20250731230633.89983-1-snitzer@kernel.org/
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20250801171049.94235-1-snitzer@kernel.org/
I only need iov_iter_aligned_bvec, but recall I want to relax its
checking with this patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20250708160619.64800-5-snitzer@kernel.org/
Should I just add iov_iter_aligned_bvec() to fs/nfs_common/ so that
both NFS and NFSD can use it?
Thanks,
Mike
> ---
> include/linux/uio.h | 2 -
> lib/iov_iter.c | 95 ---------------------------------------------
> 2 files changed, 97 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/uio.h b/include/linux/uio.h
> index 2e86c653186c6..5b127043a1519 100644
> --- a/include/linux/uio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/uio.h
> @@ -286,8 +286,6 @@ size_t _copy_mc_to_iter(const void *addr, size_t bytes, struct iov_iter *i);
> #endif
>
> size_t iov_iter_zero(size_t bytes, struct iov_iter *);
> -bool iov_iter_is_aligned(const struct iov_iter *i, unsigned addr_mask,
> - unsigned len_mask);
> unsigned long iov_iter_alignment(const struct iov_iter *i);
> unsigned long iov_iter_gap_alignment(const struct iov_iter *i);
> void iov_iter_init(struct iov_iter *i, unsigned int direction, const struct iovec *iov,
> diff --git a/lib/iov_iter.c b/lib/iov_iter.c
> index f9193f952f499..2fe66a6b8789e 100644
> --- a/lib/iov_iter.c
> +++ b/lib/iov_iter.c
> @@ -784,101 +784,6 @@ void iov_iter_discard(struct iov_iter *i, unsigned int direction, size_t count)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(iov_iter_discard);
>
> -static bool iov_iter_aligned_iovec(const struct iov_iter *i, unsigned addr_mask,
> - unsigned len_mask)
> -{
> - const struct iovec *iov = iter_iov(i);
> - size_t size = i->count;
> - size_t skip = i->iov_offset;
> -
> - do {
> - size_t len = iov->iov_len - skip;
> -
> - if (len > size)
> - len = size;
> - if (len & len_mask)
> - return false;
> - if ((unsigned long)(iov->iov_base + skip) & addr_mask)
> - return false;
> -
> - iov++;
> - size -= len;
> - skip = 0;
> - } while (size);
> -
> - return true;
> -}
> -
> -static bool iov_iter_aligned_bvec(const struct iov_iter *i, unsigned addr_mask,
> - unsigned len_mask)
> -{
> - const struct bio_vec *bvec = i->bvec;
> - unsigned skip = i->iov_offset;
> - size_t size = i->count;
> -
> - do {
> - size_t len = bvec->bv_len - skip;
> -
> - if (len > size)
> - len = size;
> - if (len & len_mask)
> - return false;
> - if ((unsigned long)(bvec->bv_offset + skip) & addr_mask)
> - return false;
> -
> - bvec++;
> - size -= len;
> - skip = 0;
> - } while (size);
> -
> - return true;
> -}
> -
> -/**
> - * iov_iter_is_aligned() - Check if the addresses and lengths of each segments
> - * are aligned to the parameters.
> - *
> - * @i: &struct iov_iter to restore
> - * @addr_mask: bit mask to check against the iov element's addresses
> - * @len_mask: bit mask to check against the iov element's lengths
> - *
> - * Return: false if any addresses or lengths intersect with the provided masks
> - */
> -bool iov_iter_is_aligned(const struct iov_iter *i, unsigned addr_mask,
> - unsigned len_mask)
> -{
> - if (likely(iter_is_ubuf(i))) {
> - if (i->count & len_mask)
> - return false;
> - if ((unsigned long)(i->ubuf + i->iov_offset) & addr_mask)
> - return false;
> - return true;
> - }
> -
> - if (likely(iter_is_iovec(i) || iov_iter_is_kvec(i)))
> - return iov_iter_aligned_iovec(i, addr_mask, len_mask);
> -
> - if (iov_iter_is_bvec(i))
> - return iov_iter_aligned_bvec(i, addr_mask, len_mask);
> -
> - /* With both xarray and folioq types, we're dealing with whole folios. */
> - if (iov_iter_is_xarray(i)) {
> - if (i->count & len_mask)
> - return false;
> - if ((i->xarray_start + i->iov_offset) & addr_mask)
> - return false;
> - }
> - if (iov_iter_is_folioq(i)) {
> - if (i->count & len_mask)
> - return false;
> - if (i->iov_offset & addr_mask)
> - return false;
> - }
> -
> - return true;
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iov_iter_is_aligned);
> -
> static unsigned long iov_iter_alignment_iovec(const struct iov_iter *i)
> {
> const struct iovec *iov = iter_iov(i);
> --
> 2.47.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-02 2:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-01 23:47 [PATCH 0/7] direct-io: even more flexible io vectors Keith Busch
2025-08-01 23:47 ` [PATCH 1/7] block: check for valid bio while splitting Keith Busch
2025-08-04 6:54 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-01 23:47 ` [PATCH 2/7] block: align the bio after building it Keith Busch
2025-08-04 6:54 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-04 14:08 ` Keith Busch
2025-08-04 16:47 ` Keith Busch
2025-08-05 6:54 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-01 23:47 ` [PATCH 3/7] block: simplify direct io validity check Keith Busch
2025-08-04 6:55 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-04 17:11 ` Keith Busch
2025-08-05 6:57 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-01 23:47 ` [PATCH 4/7] iomap: " Keith Busch
2025-08-04 6:57 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-01 23:47 ` [PATCH 5/7] block: remove bdev_iter_is_aligned Keith Busch
2025-08-04 6:57 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-01 23:47 ` [PATCH 6/7] blk-integrity: use simpler alignment check Keith Busch
2025-08-04 6:58 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-08-01 23:47 ` [PATCH 7/7] iov_iter: remove iov_iter_is_aligned Keith Busch
2025-08-02 2:02 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2025-08-04 14:16 ` Keith Busch
2025-08-04 15:25 ` Mike Snitzer
2025-08-04 15:27 ` Mike Snitzer
2025-08-04 22:26 ` Mike Snitzer
2025-08-04 22:57 ` Keith Busch
2025-08-05 0:24 ` Mike Snitzer
2025-08-02 15:37 ` [PATCH 0/7] direct-io: even more flexible io vectors Jens Axboe
2025-08-04 17:06 ` Keith Busch
2025-08-04 23:45 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aI1xySNUdQ2B0dbJ@kernel.org \
--to=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=dw@davidwei.uk \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kbusch@meta.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).