linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>, NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>,
	Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
	Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>,
	Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, hch@infradead.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] lib/iov_iter: remove piecewise bvec length checking in iov_iter_aligned_bvec
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 12:10:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aIznDZtTNk96V_5z@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aIzcDWJyft7kzGi3@kbusch-mbp>

On Fri, Aug 01, 2025 at 09:23:57AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 12:12:29PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > All said, in practice I haven't had any issues with this patch.  But
> > it could just be I don't have the stars aligned to test the case that
> > might have problems.  If you know of such a case I'd welcome
> > suggestions.
> 
> This is something I threw together that appears to be successful with
> NVMe through raw block direct-io. This will defer catching an invalid io
> vector to much later in the block stack, which should be okay, and
> removes one of the vector walks in the fast path, so that's a bonus.
> 
> While this is testing okay with NVMe so far, I haven't tested any more
> complicated setups yet, and I probably need to get filesystems using
> this relaxed limit too.

Ship it! ;)

Many thanks for this, I'll review closely and circle back!

Mike

 
> ---
> diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
> index 92c512e876c8d..634b2031c4829 100644
> --- a/block/bio.c
> +++ b/block/bio.c
> @@ -1227,13 +1227,6 @@ static int __bio_iov_iter_get_pages(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter)
>  	if (bio->bi_bdev && blk_queue_pci_p2pdma(bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk->queue))
>  		extraction_flags |= ITER_ALLOW_P2PDMA;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Each segment in the iov is required to be a block size multiple.
> -	 * However, we may not be able to get the entire segment if it spans
> -	 * more pages than bi_max_vecs allows, so we have to ALIGN_DOWN the
> -	 * result to ensure the bio's total size is correct. The remainder of
> -	 * the iov data will be picked up in the next bio iteration.
> -	 */
>  	size = iov_iter_extract_pages(iter, &pages,
>  				      UINT_MAX - bio->bi_iter.bi_size,
>  				      nr_pages, extraction_flags, &offset);
> @@ -1241,18 +1234,6 @@ static int __bio_iov_iter_get_pages(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter)
>  		return size ? size : -EFAULT;
>  
>  	nr_pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(offset + size, PAGE_SIZE);
> -
> -	if (bio->bi_bdev) {
> -		size_t trim = size & (bdev_logical_block_size(bio->bi_bdev) - 1);
> -		iov_iter_revert(iter, trim);
> -		size -= trim;
> -	}
> -
> -	if (unlikely(!size)) {
> -		ret = -EFAULT;
> -		goto out;
> -	}
> -
>  	for (left = size, i = 0; left > 0; left -= len, i += num_pages) {
>  		struct page *page = pages[i];
>  		struct folio *folio = page_folio(page);
> @@ -1297,6 +1278,23 @@ static int __bio_iov_iter_get_pages(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int bio_align_to_bs(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter)
> +{
> +	unsigned int mask = bdev_logical_block_size(bio->bi_bdev) - 1;
> +	unsigned int total = bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
> +	size_t trim = total & mask;
> +
> +	if (!trim)
> +	        return 0;
> +
> +	/* FIXME: might be leaking pages */
> +	bio_revert(bio, trim);
> +	iov_iter_revert(iter, trim);
> +	if (total == trim)
> +	        return -EFAULT;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * bio_iov_iter_get_pages - add user or kernel pages to a bio
>   * @bio: bio to add pages to
> @@ -1327,7 +1325,7 @@ int bio_iov_iter_get_pages(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter)
>  	if (iov_iter_is_bvec(iter)) {
>  		bio_iov_bvec_set(bio, iter);
>  		iov_iter_advance(iter, bio->bi_iter.bi_size);
> -		return 0;
> +		return bio_align_to_bs(bio, iter);
>  	}
>  
>  	if (iov_iter_extract_will_pin(iter))
> @@ -1336,6 +1334,7 @@ int bio_iov_iter_get_pages(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter)
>  		ret = __bio_iov_iter_get_pages(bio, iter);
>  	} while (!ret && iov_iter_count(iter) && !bio_full(bio, 0));
>  
> +	ret = bio_align_to_bs(bio, iter);
>  	return bio->bi_vcnt ? 0 : ret;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bio_iov_iter_get_pages);
> diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
> index 70d704615be52..a3acfef8eb81d 100644
> --- a/block/blk-merge.c
> +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
> @@ -298,6 +298,9 @@ int bio_split_rw_at(struct bio *bio, const struct queue_limits *lim,
>  	unsigned nsegs = 0, bytes = 0;
>  
>  	bio_for_each_bvec(bv, bio, iter) {
> +		if (bv.bv_offset & lim->dma_alignment)
> +			return -EFAULT;
> +
>  		/*
>  		 * If the queue doesn't support SG gaps and adding this
>  		 * offset would create a gap, disallow it.
> @@ -341,6 +344,8 @@ int bio_split_rw_at(struct bio *bio, const struct queue_limits *lim,
>  	 * we do not use the full hardware limits.
>  	 */
>  	bytes = ALIGN_DOWN(bytes, bio_split_alignment(bio, lim));
> +	if (!bytes)
> +		return -EFAULT;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Bio splitting may cause subtle trouble such as hang when doing sync
> diff --git a/block/fops.c b/block/fops.c
> index 82451ac8ff25d..820902cf10730 100644
> --- a/block/fops.c
> +++ b/block/fops.c
> @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ static blk_opf_t dio_bio_write_op(struct kiocb *iocb)
>  static bool blkdev_dio_invalid(struct block_device *bdev, struct kiocb *iocb,
>  				struct iov_iter *iter)
>  {
> -	return iocb->ki_pos & (bdev_logical_block_size(bdev) - 1) ||
> -		!bdev_iter_is_aligned(bdev, iter);
> +	return (iocb->ki_pos | iov_iter_count(iter)) &
> +			(bdev_logical_block_size(bdev) - 1);
>  }
>  
>  #define DIO_INLINE_BIO_VECS 4
> diff --git a/include/linux/bio.h b/include/linux/bio.h
> index 46ffac5caab78..d3ddf78d1f35e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bio.h
> @@ -169,6 +169,22 @@ static inline void bio_advance(struct bio *bio, unsigned int nbytes)
>  
>  #define bio_iter_last(bvec, iter) ((iter).bi_size == (bvec).bv_len)
>  
> +static inline void bio_revert(struct bio *bio, unsigned int nbytes)
> +{
> +	bio->bi_iter.bi_size -= nbytes;
> +
> +	while (nbytes) {
> +		struct bio_vec *bv = &bio->bi_io_vec[bio->bi_vcnt - 1];
> +
> +		if (nbytes < bv->bv_len) {
> +			bv->bv_len -= nbytes;
> +			return;
> +		}
> +		bio->bi_vcnt--;
> +		nbytes -= bv->bv_len;
> +       }
> +}
> +
>  static inline unsigned bio_segments(struct bio *bio)
>  {
>  	unsigned segs = 0;
> --

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-01 16:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20250708160619.64800-1-snitzer@kernel.org>
     [not found] ` <20250708160619.64800-5-snitzer@kernel.org>
     [not found]   ` <aG9qtlHCmSztOsFo@infradead.org>
2025-07-10  7:32     ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] lib/iov_iter: remove piecewise bvec length checking in iov_iter_aligned_bvec Mike Snitzer
2025-07-10  7:44       ` Christoph Hellwig
     [not found]   ` <5819d6c5bb194613a14d2dcf05605e701683ba49.camel@kernel.org>
     [not found]     ` <aG_SpLuUv4EH7fAb@kbusch-mbp>
2025-07-10 16:12       ` Mike Snitzer
2025-07-10 16:29         ` Keith Busch
2025-07-10 17:22           ` Mike Snitzer
2025-07-10 19:51             ` Keith Busch
2025-07-10 19:57             ` Keith Busch
2025-08-01 15:23         ` Keith Busch
2025-08-01 16:10           ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
     [not found] ` <20250708160619.64800-4-snitzer@kernel.org>
2025-07-10  7:45   ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] NFSD: filecache: add STATX_DIOALIGN and STATX_DIO_READ_ALIGN support Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-14 17:46     ` Mike Snitzer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aIznDZtTNk96V_5z@kernel.org \
    --to=snitzer@kernel.org \
    --cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
    --cc=anna@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=neil@brown.name \
    --cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    --cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).