From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from swift.blarg.de (swift.blarg.de [138.201.185.127]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80FF626E706; Wed, 27 Aug 2025 04:57:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=138.201.185.127 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756270636; cv=none; b=TVal42kvMI94PNXha25HE0rYul/xdS2MO3rWfwsL4E+rozmTheXdGeQpePviZNU/gsGGJOPheKF8IqxPcWGhUb4zoAdacs/shK3mJXykA3BqI6bpl3fYI0d4CLtNERImwhwDzYS/Mx6Xfqsdvg3WN45ke9aXIl8UeOG7bA9aKec= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756270636; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IyVahI6QrFyvU7FHkeFmFHYidFzPlEK+OjrUBfoDlac=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=pZSsVnuej+9SP9CNLWGonDAcHy84EPGgdnRC44XBr8ORIpEsRHue3/rxk40LolhSQ9zxe5n8ScbgAN2/yubw2a0ngNQg0yJ9qfh5nIOEOtlAs9mnl83zIxyP31GQrAjJfRGLZd8RBXOiUR1fhSl/5WXBT4QJyi7cBIJvoNKR9AM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=blarg.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=blarg.de; arc=none smtp.client-ip=138.201.185.127 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=blarg.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=blarg.de Received: from swift.blarg.de (swift.blarg.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c17:52a8::2]) (Authenticated sender: max) by swift.blarg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F0ED440230; Wed, 27 Aug 2025 06:57:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 06:57:10 +0200 From: Max Kellermann To: Viacheslav Dubeyko Cc: David Howells , "brauner@kernel.org" , "slava@dubeyko.com" , "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Alex Markuze , Patrick Donnelly , "willy@infradead.org" , "idryomov@gmail.com" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] ceph: introduce ceph_submit_write() method Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Viacheslav Dubeyko , David Howells , "brauner@kernel.org" , "slava@dubeyko.com" , "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Alex Markuze , Patrick Donnelly , "willy@infradead.org" , "idryomov@gmail.com" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" References: <20250205000249.123054-1-slava@dubeyko.com> <20250205000249.123054-4-slava@dubeyko.com> <4a75d243b3002ae8608b6e2530452924d192524f.camel@ibm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4a75d243b3002ae8608b6e2530452924d192524f.camel@ibm.com> On 2025/08/27 05:06, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote: > The open-source is space for collaboration and respect of each other. It is not > space for offensive or bullying behavior. This is now your third reply to a comment on your patch set (one to Matthew and two to me), and you are still sidestepping the valid criticism. This time, instead of talking how to fix it, you are explaining how well you tested this, and then this meta-comment. No, for the bug discussion, it does not matter how well you tested this. If it's buggy, it's buggy. For me, as an amateur, the bug was obvious enough to see in the source code, and after my long explanation, it should be easy enough for everybody else to see, isn't it? And no, I don't owe you a test case. I explained the exact conditions that need to occur for the crash to happen, and I have to trust that you are capable of easily injecting such an error, aren't you? This is not what I call "collaboration" neither "respect", to me it rather seems like ignorance. You were not collaborating with the reviewer and you are not respecting the bug report. You just divert the discussion instead of talking about the actual problems. And, note: in both of your replies to me, you removed me from the recipient list. Everybody else you kept, you only removed me. I had to look up your replies on lore.kernel.org. (You did not do that with your replies to Matthew and David.) What kind of funny behavior is that? Max