linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>,
	axboe@kernel.dk, rajeevm@hpe.com, yukuai3@huawei.com,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com,
	johnny.chenyi@huawei.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loop: fix zero sized loop for block special file
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 02:18:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aKwqUVmX-yH6_lZy@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aKwlVypJuBtPH_EL@fedora>

On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 04:56:55PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> `stat $BDEV_PATH` never works for getting bdev size, so it looks wrong
> to call vfs_getattr_nosec() with bdev path for retrieving bdev's size.

Exactly.

> So just wondering why not take the following more readable way?
> 
> 	/* vfs_getattr() never works for retrieving bdev size */
> 	if (S_ISBLK(stat.mode)) {
> 		loopsize = i_size_read(file->f_mapping->host);
> 	} else {
>           ret = vfs_getattr_nosec(&file->f_path, &stat, STATX_SIZE, 0);
>           if (ret)
>                   return 0;
>           loopsize = stat.size;
> 	}
> 
> Also the above looks like how application reads file size in case of bdev
> involved.

That's not just more readable, but simply the way to go.  Maybe split
it into a helper for readability, though.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-25  9:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20250825062300.2485281-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
2025-08-25  8:56 ` [PATCH] loop: fix zero sized loop for block special file Ming Lei
2025-08-25  9:18   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-08-25  9:36     ` Yu Kuai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aKwqUVmX-yH6_lZy@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=johnny.chenyi@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=rajeevm@hpe.com \
    --cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).