linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, brauner@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org,
	jack@suse.cz, hch@infradead.org, jlayton@kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/12] iomap: add granular dirty and writeback accounting
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 14:48:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aLiNYdLaMIslxySo@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250902234604.GC1587915@frogsfrogsfrogs>

On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 04:46:04PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 04:39:42PM -0700, Joanne Koong wrote:
> > Add granular dirty and writeback accounting for large folios. These
> > stats are used by the mm layer for dirty balancing and throttling.
> > Having granular dirty and writeback accounting helps prevent
> > over-aggressive balancing and throttling.
> > 
> > There are 4 places in iomap this commit affects:
> > a) filemap dirtying, which now calls filemap_dirty_folio_pages()
> > b) writeback_iter with setting the wbc->no_stats_accounting bit and
> > calling clear_dirty_for_io_stats()
> > c) starting writeback, which now calls __folio_start_writeback()
> > d) ending writeback, which now calls folio_end_writeback_pages()
> > 
> > This relies on using the ifs->state dirty bitmap to track dirty pages in
> > the folio. As such, this can only be utilized on filesystems where the
> > block size >= PAGE_SIZE.
> 
> Er... is this statement correct?  I thought that you wanted the granular
> dirty page accounting when it's possible that individual sub-pages of a
> folio could be dirty.
> 
> If i_blocksize >= PAGE_SIZE, then we'll have set the min folio order and
> there will be exactly one (large) folio for a single fsblock.  Writeback
> must happen in units of fsblocks, so there's no point in doing the extra
> accounting calculations if there's only one fsblock.
> 
> Waitaminute, I think the logic to decide if you're going to use the
> granular accounting is:
> 
> 	(folio_size > PAGE_SIZE && folio_size > i_blocksize)
> 
> Hrm?
> 

I'm also a little confused why this needs to be restricted to blocksize
gte PAGE_SIZE. The lower level helpers all seem to be managing block
ranges, and then apparently just want to be able to use that directly as
a page count (for accounting purposes).

Is there any reason the lower level functions couldn't return block
units, then the higher level code can use a blocks_per_page or some such
to translate that to a base page count..? As Darrick points out I assume
you'd want to shortcut the folio_nr_pages() == 1 case to use a min page
count of 1, but otherwise ISTM that would allow this to work with
configs like 64k pagesize and 4k blocks as well. Am I missing something?

Brian

> > Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 140 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 132 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> > index 4f021dcaaffe..bf33a5361a39 100644
> > --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> > +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> > @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ struct iomap_folio_state {
> >  	spinlock_t		state_lock;
> >  	unsigned int		read_bytes_pending;
> >  	atomic_t		write_bytes_pending;
> > +	/* number of pages being currently written back */
> > +	unsigned		nr_pages_writeback;
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Each block has two bits in this bitmap:
> > @@ -139,6 +141,29 @@ static unsigned ifs_next_clean_block(struct folio *folio,
> >  		blks + start_blk) - blks;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static unsigned ifs_count_dirty_pages(struct folio *folio)
> > +{
> > +	struct inode *inode = folio->mapping->host;
> > +	unsigned block_size = i_blocksize(inode);
> > +	unsigned start_blk, end_blk;
> > +	unsigned blks, nblks = 0;
> > +
> > +	start_blk = 0;
> > +	blks = i_blocks_per_folio(inode, folio);
> > +	end_blk = (i_size_read(inode) - 1) >> inode->i_blkbits;
> > +	end_blk = min(end_blk, i_blocks_per_folio(inode, folio) - 1);
> > +
> > +	while (start_blk <= end_blk) {
> > +		start_blk = ifs_next_dirty_block(folio, start_blk, end_blk);
> > +		if (start_blk > end_blk)
> > +			break;
> 
> Use your new helper?
> 
> 		nblks = ifs_next_clean_block(folio, start_blk + 1,
> 				end_blk) - start_blk?
> > +		nblks++;
> > +		start_blk++;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return nblks * (block_size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> 
> I think this returns the number of dirty basepages in a given large
> folio?  If that's the case then shouldn't this return long, like
> folio_nr_pages does?
> 
> > +}
> > +
> >  static unsigned ifs_find_dirty_range(struct folio *folio,
> >  		struct iomap_folio_state *ifs, u64 *range_start, u64 range_end)
> >  {
> > @@ -220,6 +245,58 @@ static void iomap_set_range_dirty(struct folio *folio, size_t off, size_t len)
> >  		ifs_set_range_dirty(folio, ifs, off, len);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static long iomap_get_range_newly_dirtied(struct folio *folio, loff_t pos,
> > +		unsigned len)
> 
> iomap_count_clean_pages() ?
> 
> --D
> 
> > +{
> > +	struct inode *inode = folio->mapping->host;
> > +	unsigned block_size = i_blocksize(inode);
> > +	unsigned start_blk, end_blk;
> > +	unsigned nblks = 0;
> > +
> > +	start_blk = pos >> inode->i_blkbits;
> > +	end_blk = (pos + len - 1) >> inode->i_blkbits;
> > +	end_blk = min(end_blk, i_blocks_per_folio(inode, folio) - 1);
> > +
> > +	while (start_blk <= end_blk) {
> > +		/* count how many clean blocks there are */
> > +		start_blk = ifs_next_clean_block(folio, start_blk, end_blk);
> > +		if (start_blk > end_blk)
> > +			break;
> > +		nblks++;
> > +		start_blk++;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return nblks * (block_size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool iomap_granular_dirty_pages(struct folio *folio)
> > +{
> > +	struct iomap_folio_state *ifs = folio->private;
> > +
> > +	if (!ifs)
> > +		return false;
> > +
> > +	return i_blocksize(folio->mapping->host) >= PAGE_SIZE;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool iomap_dirty_folio_range(struct address_space *mapping,
> > +			struct folio *folio, loff_t pos, unsigned len)
> > +{
> > +	long nr_new_dirty_pages;
> > +
> > +	if (!iomap_granular_dirty_pages(folio)) {
> > +		iomap_set_range_dirty(folio, pos, len);
> > +		return filemap_dirty_folio(mapping, folio);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	nr_new_dirty_pages = iomap_get_range_newly_dirtied(folio, pos, len);
> > +	if (!nr_new_dirty_pages)
> > +		return false;
> > +
> > +	iomap_set_range_dirty(folio, pos, len);
> > +	return filemap_dirty_folio_pages(mapping, folio, nr_new_dirty_pages);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static struct iomap_folio_state *ifs_alloc(struct inode *inode,
> >  		struct folio *folio, unsigned int flags)
> >  {
> > @@ -712,8 +789,7 @@ bool iomap_dirty_folio(struct address_space *mapping, struct folio *folio)
> >  	size_t len = folio_size(folio);
> >  
> >  	ifs_alloc(inode, folio, 0);
> > -	iomap_set_range_dirty(folio, 0, len);
> > -	return filemap_dirty_folio(mapping, folio);
> > +	return iomap_dirty_folio_range(mapping, folio, 0, len);
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iomap_dirty_folio);
> >  
> > @@ -937,8 +1013,8 @@ static bool __iomap_write_end(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, size_t len,
> >  	if (unlikely(copied < len && !folio_test_uptodate(folio)))
> >  		return false;
> >  	iomap_set_range_uptodate(folio, offset_in_folio(folio, pos), len);
> > -	iomap_set_range_dirty(folio, offset_in_folio(folio, pos), copied);
> > -	filemap_dirty_folio(inode->i_mapping, folio);
> > +	iomap_dirty_folio_range(inode->i_mapping, folio,
> > +			offset_in_folio(folio, pos), copied);
> >  	return true;
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -1613,6 +1689,29 @@ void iomap_start_folio_write(struct inode *inode, struct folio *folio,
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iomap_start_folio_write);
> >  
> > +static void iomap_folio_start_writeback(struct folio *folio)
> > +{
> > +	struct iomap_folio_state *ifs = folio->private;
> > +
> > +	if (!iomap_granular_dirty_pages(folio))
> > +		return folio_start_writeback(folio);
> > +
> > +	__folio_start_writeback(folio, false, ifs->nr_pages_writeback);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void iomap_folio_end_writeback(struct folio *folio)
> > +{
> > +	struct iomap_folio_state *ifs = folio->private;
> > +	long nr_pages_writeback;
> > +
> > +	if (!iomap_granular_dirty_pages(folio))
> > +		return folio_end_writeback(folio);
> > +
> > +	nr_pages_writeback = ifs->nr_pages_writeback;
> > +	ifs->nr_pages_writeback = 0;
> > +	folio_end_writeback_pages(folio, nr_pages_writeback);
> > +}
> > +
> >  void iomap_finish_folio_write(struct inode *inode, struct folio *folio,
> >  		size_t len)
> >  {
> > @@ -1622,7 +1721,7 @@ void iomap_finish_folio_write(struct inode *inode, struct folio *folio,
> >  	WARN_ON_ONCE(ifs && atomic_read(&ifs->write_bytes_pending) <= 0);
> >  
> >  	if (!ifs || atomic_sub_and_test(len, &ifs->write_bytes_pending))
> > -		folio_end_writeback(folio);
> > +		iomap_folio_end_writeback(folio);
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iomap_finish_folio_write);
> >  
> > @@ -1710,6 +1809,21 @@ static bool iomap_writeback_handle_eof(struct folio *folio, struct inode *inode,
> >  	return true;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void iomap_update_dirty_stats(struct folio *folio)
> > +{
> > +	struct iomap_folio_state *ifs = folio->private;
> > +	long nr_dirty_pages;
> > +
> > +	if (iomap_granular_dirty_pages(folio)) {
> > +		nr_dirty_pages = ifs_count_dirty_pages(folio);
> > +		ifs->nr_pages_writeback = nr_dirty_pages;
> > +	} else {
> > +		nr_dirty_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	clear_dirty_for_io_stats(folio, nr_dirty_pages);
> > +}
> > +
> >  int iomap_writeback_folio(struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc, struct folio *folio)
> >  {
> >  	struct iomap_folio_state *ifs = folio->private;
> > @@ -1727,6 +1841,8 @@ int iomap_writeback_folio(struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc, struct folio *folio)
> >  
> >  	trace_iomap_writeback_folio(inode, pos, folio_size(folio));
> >  
> > +	iomap_update_dirty_stats(folio);
> > +
> >  	if (!iomap_writeback_handle_eof(folio, inode, &end_pos))
> >  		return 0;
> >  	WARN_ON_ONCE(end_pos <= pos);
> > @@ -1734,6 +1850,7 @@ int iomap_writeback_folio(struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc, struct folio *folio)
> >  	if (i_blocks_per_folio(inode, folio) > 1) {
> >  		if (!ifs) {
> >  			ifs = ifs_alloc(inode, folio, 0);
> > +			ifs->nr_pages_writeback = folio_nr_pages(folio);
> >  			iomap_set_range_dirty(folio, 0, end_pos - pos);
> >  		}
> >  
> > @@ -1751,7 +1868,7 @@ int iomap_writeback_folio(struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc, struct folio *folio)
> >  	 * Set the writeback bit ASAP, as the I/O completion for the single
> >  	 * block per folio case happen hit as soon as we're submitting the bio.
> >  	 */
> > -	folio_start_writeback(folio);
> > +	iomap_folio_start_writeback(folio);
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Walk through the folio to find dirty areas to write back.
> > @@ -1784,10 +1901,10 @@ int iomap_writeback_folio(struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc, struct folio *folio)
> >  	 */
> >  	if (ifs) {
> >  		if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ifs->write_bytes_pending))
> > -			folio_end_writeback(folio);
> > +			iomap_folio_end_writeback(folio);
> >  	} else {
> >  		if (!wb_pending)
> > -			folio_end_writeback(folio);
> > +			iomap_folio_end_writeback(folio);
> >  	}
> >  	mapping_set_error(inode->i_mapping, error);
> >  	return error;
> > @@ -1809,6 +1926,13 @@ iomap_writepages(struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc)
> >  			PF_MEMALLOC))
> >  		return -EIO;
> >  
> > +	/*
> > +	 * iomap opts out of the default wbc stats accounting because it does
> > +	 * its own granular dirty/writeback accounting (see
> > +	 * iomap_update_dirty_stats()).
> > +	 */
> > +	wpc->wbc->no_stats_accounting = true;
> > +
> >  	while ((folio = writeback_iter(mapping, wpc->wbc, folio, &error))) {
> >  		error = iomap_writeback_folio(wpc, folio);
> >  		folio_unlock(folio);
> > -- 
> > 2.47.3
> > 
> > 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-03 18:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-29 23:39 [PATCH v2 00/12] mm/iomap: add granular dirty and writeback accounting Joanne Koong
2025-08-29 23:39 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] mm: pass number of pages to __folio_start_writeback() Joanne Koong
2025-09-03 11:48   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-03 20:02     ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-09-03 20:05       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-03 23:12         ` Joanne Koong
2025-08-29 23:39 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] mm: pass number of pages to __folio_end_writeback() Joanne Koong
2025-08-29 23:39 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] mm: add folio_end_writeback_pages() helper Joanne Koong
2025-08-29 23:39 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] mm: pass number of pages dirtied to __folio_mark_dirty() Joanne Koong
2025-08-29 23:39 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] mm: add filemap_dirty_folio_pages() helper Joanne Koong
2025-08-29 23:39 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] mm: add __folio_clear_dirty_for_io() helper Joanne Koong
2025-08-29 23:39 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] mm: add no_stats_accounting bitfield to wbc Joanne Koong
2025-08-29 23:39 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] mm: refactor clearing dirty stats into helper function Joanne Koong
2025-08-29 23:39 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] mm: add clear_dirty_for_io_stats() helper Joanne Koong
2025-08-29 23:39 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] iomap: refactor dirty bitmap iteration Joanne Koong
2025-09-03 18:53   ` Brian Foster
2025-09-03 19:59     ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-08-29 23:39 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] iomap: refactor uptodate " Joanne Koong
2025-08-29 23:39 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] iomap: add granular dirty and writeback accounting Joanne Koong
2025-09-02 23:46   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-09-03 18:48     ` Brian Foster [this message]
2025-09-04  0:35       ` Joanne Koong
2025-09-04  2:52         ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-09-04 11:47         ` Brian Foster
2025-09-04 20:07           ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-09-05  0:14             ` Joanne Koong
2025-09-05 11:19               ` Brian Foster
2025-09-05 12:43                 ` Jan Kara
2025-09-05 23:30                   ` Joanne Koong
2025-09-04  8:53 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] mm/iomap: " Jan Kara
2025-09-04 23:59   ` Joanne Koong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aLiNYdLaMIslxySo@bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).