From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24E55334367; Thu, 11 Sep 2025 11:37:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757590678; cv=none; b=D/5xZqlhHu2l+byzpcpXjlV4xPoj3GGRnBSZa5T1UNn6JMyjxa83ScqDcg16/qhrJwWvX02CrA3XAYKZCR2EAJ7reQ2w50A7XiklLCYZpToVsCzvUKrTmRb6qNcN9OeZo8rbXghXk5Dcif0w1mAtIk5O69WRT1yrLjy1FOsB7Is= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757590678; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rnp8EsaMc9fWMrqdqXN4/XgyJX6op1Hcet7eQl/Xfbs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=hjRUK8lLf44wBLok+6CJ4ItQC86vjoCi9kEergdw+TKrrYwc2WyQGyPGRmmEFV4JcJMtPoihKmcvy1mboxl77yLBHUkpUmjwvxLu7BdG7LDJrbPCAA0H9yXwd3t67ovz0M7K0QtZl0Pp5iLFwOqqVm8d2JdYZaNJCZLM8uRgnto= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=UzOLmEC0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="UzOLmEC0" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=Y8JcLR6V6lTUkf/L1dN4cS7VInD8rNcP4lWlHUTCHcc=; b=UzOLmEC0OxawPpj5/Q0LlYCNhQ tqfL/EZf3cpCdOcXJO46I+ieEgX3c8LiYPTUpE2YtoK8TJ68jH5mdpySRwCCf6Nt+7ZSTSIEN0BNH n4o6OtSJOFUY74TKbcQJYSUxAnGd34M4N8mqNzEt4ErBo8Mo8fa0fOHJnqHvzc8rqx5F7+Yzhp/Iz Rq8aRWD6MemS4RPDyfnHYPxAuFKQWBz0ZPGiOGOh+hfMBEAgVjPWLivnLvC9V8Fjwhr3a6sLxAtxn U74x4j6KjnwagkqgBbiHdO038Xu5lL7Gj7EBJY+LC6ugoGKCQLtyqWG9V8LgMETZfRZINdNiSVoc5 7LkYKxNw==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uwfci-00000002jXy-14Tz; Thu, 11 Sep 2025 11:37:56 +0000 Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 04:37:56 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Gao Xiang Cc: Joanne Koong , brauner@kernel.org, miklos@szeredi.hu, hch@infradead.org, djwong@kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, gfs2@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/16] iomap: move read/readahead logic out of CONFIG_BLOCK guard Message-ID: References: <20250908185122.3199171-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com> <20250908185122.3199171-14-joannelkoong@gmail.com> <0b33ab17-2fc0-438f-95aa-56a1d20edb38@linux.alibaba.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0b33ab17-2fc0-438f-95aa-56a1d20edb38@linux.alibaba.com> X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 12:59:41PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: > At least it sounds better on my side, but anyway it's just > my own overall thought. If other folks have different idea, > I don't have strong opinion, I just need something for my own > as previous said. I already dropped my two suggestions on the earlier patch. Not totally happy about either my suggestions or data, but in full agreement that it should be something else than private.