linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	hch@lst.de, axboe@kernel.dk, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 5/8] iomap: simplify direct io validity check
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 16:25:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aP-c5gPjrpsn0vJA@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250827141258.63501-6-kbusch@meta.com>

On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 07:12:55AM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
> 
> The block layer checks all the segments for validity later, so no need
> for an early check. Just reduce it to a simple position and total length
> check, and defer the more invasive segment checks to the block layer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  fs/iomap/direct-io.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> index fea23fa6a402f..c06e41fd4d0af 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> @@ -337,8 +337,7 @@ static int iomap_dio_bio_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, struct iomap_dio *dio)
>  	u64 copied = 0;
>  	size_t orig_count;
>  
> -	if ((pos | length) & (bdev_logical_block_size(iomap->bdev) - 1) ||
> -	    !bdev_iter_is_aligned(iomap->bdev, dio->submit.iter))
> +	if ((pos | length) & (bdev_logical_block_size(iomap->bdev) - 1))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	if (dio->flags & IOMAP_DIO_WRITE) {
> -- 
> 2.47.3
> 

Hey Keith, I'be bisected an LTP issue down to this patch. There is a
O_DIRECT read test that expects EINVAL for a bad buffer alignment.
However, if I understand the patchset correctly, this is intentional
move which makes this LTP test obsolete, correct?

The broken test is "test 5" here:
https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/master/testcases/kernel/syscalls/read/read02.c

... and this is what I get now:
  read02.c:87: TFAIL: read() failed unexpectedly, expected EINVAL: EIO (5)

Cheers,
Carlos Llamas

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-27 16:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-27 14:12 [PATCHv4 0/8] Keith Busch
2025-08-27 14:12 ` [PATCHv4 1/8] block: check for valid bio while splitting Keith Busch
2025-08-31  0:40   ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-08-27 14:12 ` [PATCHv4 2/8] block: add size alignment to bio_iov_iter_get_pages Keith Busch
2025-08-31  0:40   ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-08-27 14:12 ` [PATCHv4 3/8] block: align the bio after building it Keith Busch
2025-08-31  0:41   ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-09-02  5:23   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-27 14:12 ` [PATCHv4 4/8] block: simplify direct io validity check Keith Busch
2025-08-27 14:12 ` [PATCHv4 5/8] iomap: " Keith Busch
2025-10-27 16:25   ` Carlos Llamas [this message]
2025-10-27 16:42     ` Keith Busch
2025-10-27 17:12       ` Carlos Llamas
2025-10-28 22:47       ` Carlos Llamas
2025-10-28 22:56         ` Eric Biggers
2025-10-28 23:03           ` Eric Biggers
2025-10-29  7:06             ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-30 17:40               ` Eric Biggers
2025-10-31  9:18                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-03 18:10                   ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-03 18:26                     ` Keith Busch
2025-11-04 11:35                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-30  4:54             ` Carlos Llamas
2025-08-27 14:12 ` [PATCHv4 6/8] block: remove bdev_iter_is_aligned Keith Busch
2025-08-27 14:12 ` [PATCHv4 7/8] blk-integrity: use simpler alignment check Keith Busch
2025-08-27 14:12 ` [PATCHv4 8/8] iov_iter: remove iov_iter_is_aligned Keith Busch
2025-09-09 16:27 ` [PATCHv4 0/8] Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aP-c5gPjrpsn0vJA@google.com \
    --to=cmllamas@google.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=kbusch@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).