From: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
hch@lst.de, axboe@kernel.dk, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 5/8] iomap: simplify direct io validity check
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 16:25:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aP-c5gPjrpsn0vJA@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250827141258.63501-6-kbusch@meta.com>
On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 07:12:55AM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
>
> The block layer checks all the segments for validity later, so no need
> for an early check. Just reduce it to a simple position and total length
> check, and defer the more invasive segment checks to the block layer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> fs/iomap/direct-io.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> index fea23fa6a402f..c06e41fd4d0af 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> @@ -337,8 +337,7 @@ static int iomap_dio_bio_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, struct iomap_dio *dio)
> u64 copied = 0;
> size_t orig_count;
>
> - if ((pos | length) & (bdev_logical_block_size(iomap->bdev) - 1) ||
> - !bdev_iter_is_aligned(iomap->bdev, dio->submit.iter))
> + if ((pos | length) & (bdev_logical_block_size(iomap->bdev) - 1))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> if (dio->flags & IOMAP_DIO_WRITE) {
> --
> 2.47.3
>
Hey Keith, I'be bisected an LTP issue down to this patch. There is a
O_DIRECT read test that expects EINVAL for a bad buffer alignment.
However, if I understand the patchset correctly, this is intentional
move which makes this LTP test obsolete, correct?
The broken test is "test 5" here:
https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/master/testcases/kernel/syscalls/read/read02.c
... and this is what I get now:
read02.c:87: TFAIL: read() failed unexpectedly, expected EINVAL: EIO (5)
Cheers,
Carlos Llamas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-27 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-27 14:12 [PATCHv4 0/8] Keith Busch
2025-08-27 14:12 ` [PATCHv4 1/8] block: check for valid bio while splitting Keith Busch
2025-08-31 0:40 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-08-27 14:12 ` [PATCHv4 2/8] block: add size alignment to bio_iov_iter_get_pages Keith Busch
2025-08-31 0:40 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-08-27 14:12 ` [PATCHv4 3/8] block: align the bio after building it Keith Busch
2025-08-31 0:41 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-09-02 5:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-27 14:12 ` [PATCHv4 4/8] block: simplify direct io validity check Keith Busch
2025-08-27 14:12 ` [PATCHv4 5/8] iomap: " Keith Busch
2025-10-27 16:25 ` Carlos Llamas [this message]
2025-10-27 16:42 ` Keith Busch
2025-10-27 17:12 ` Carlos Llamas
2025-10-28 22:47 ` Carlos Llamas
2025-10-28 22:56 ` Eric Biggers
2025-10-28 23:03 ` Eric Biggers
2025-10-29 7:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-30 17:40 ` Eric Biggers
2025-10-31 9:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-03 18:10 ` Eric Biggers
2025-11-03 18:26 ` Keith Busch
2025-11-04 11:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-30 4:54 ` Carlos Llamas
2025-08-27 14:12 ` [PATCHv4 6/8] block: remove bdev_iter_is_aligned Keith Busch
2025-08-27 14:12 ` [PATCHv4 7/8] blk-integrity: use simpler alignment check Keith Busch
2025-08-27 14:12 ` [PATCHv4 8/8] iov_iter: remove iov_iter_is_aligned Keith Busch
2025-09-09 16:27 ` [PATCHv4 0/8] Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aP-c5gPjrpsn0vJA@google.com \
--to=cmllamas@google.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kbusch@meta.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).