From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/6] loop: add helper lo_cmd_nr_bvec()
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 10:19:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPBWGzcuqENGqwAJ@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5692dd74-ab1c-4451-9d28-b436ee658f6e@acm.org>
On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 08:49:45AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 10/15/25 4:07 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > +static inline unsigned lo_cmd_nr_bvec(struct loop_cmd *cmd)
> > +{
> > + struct request *rq = blk_mq_rq_from_pdu(cmd);
> > + struct req_iterator rq_iter;
> > + struct bio_vec tmp;
> > + int nr_bvec = 0;
> > +
> > + rq_for_each_bvec(tmp, rq, rq_iter)
> > + nr_bvec++;
> > +
> > + return nr_bvec;
> > +}
>
> 'cmd' is not used in this function other than in the conversion to a
> struct request. Has it been considered to change the argument type of
> this function from 'struct loop_cmd *' into 'struct request *'? That
> will allow to leave out the blk_mq_rq_from_pdu() from this function.
> Otherwise this patch looks good to me.
It isn't one big deal, I can switch to `request *` if respin is needed,
otherwise I'd leave it as it is.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-16 2:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-15 11:07 [PATCH V5 0/6] loop: improve loop aio perf by IOCB_NOWAIT Ming Lei
2025-10-15 11:07 ` [PATCH V5 1/6] loop: add helper lo_cmd_nr_bvec() Ming Lei
2025-10-15 15:49 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-10-16 2:19 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-10-15 11:07 ` [PATCH V5 2/6] loop: add helper lo_rw_aio_prep() Ming Lei
2025-10-15 11:07 ` [PATCH V5 3/6] loop: add lo_submit_rw_aio() Ming Lei
2025-10-15 11:07 ` [PATCH V5 4/6] loop: move command blkcg/memcg initialization into loop_queue_work Ming Lei
2025-10-15 11:07 ` [PATCH V5 5/6] loop: try to handle loop aio command via NOWAIT IO first Ming Lei
2025-10-15 11:07 ` [PATCH V5 6/6] loop: add hint for handling aio via IOCB_NOWAIT Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aPBWGzcuqENGqwAJ@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).