[PATCH v3 0/2] vfs-6.19.iomap commit 51311f045375 fixups

[PATCH v3 0/2] vfs-6.19.iomap commit 51311f045375 fixups

[Joanne Koong]

These are two fixups for commit 51311f045375 ("iomap: track pending read
bytes more optimally") in the vfs-6.19.iomap branch. It would be great
if these could get folded into that original commit, if possible.

The fix for the race was locally tested by running generic/051 in a loop on an
xfs filesystem with 1k block size, as reported by Brian in [1].

Thanks,
Joanne

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20250926002609.1302233-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/T/#t 

Changelog:
v2 -> v3:
Fix the race by adding a bias instead of returning from iomap_read_end() early.

v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20251027181245.2657535-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20251024215008.3844068-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/#t

Joanne Koong (2):
  iomap: rename bytes_pending/bytes_accounted to
    bytes_submitted/bytes_not_submitted
  iomap: fix race when reading in all bytes of a folio

 fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

-- 
2.47.3

[PATCH v3 1/2] iomap: rename bytes_pending/bytes_accounted to bytes_submitted/bytes_not_submitted

[Joanne Koong]

As mentioned by Brian in [1], the naming "bytes_pending" and
"bytes_accounting" may be confusing and could be better named. Rename
this to "bytes_submitted" and "bytes_not_submitted" to make it more
clear that these are bytes we passed to the IO helper to read in.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/aPuz4Uop66-jRpN-@bfoster/

Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
---
 fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
index 72196e5021b1..4c0d66612a67 100644
--- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
@@ -364,16 +364,16 @@ static void iomap_read_init(struct folio *folio)
 	}
 }
 
-static void iomap_read_end(struct folio *folio, size_t bytes_pending)
+static void iomap_read_end(struct folio *folio, size_t bytes_submitted)
 {
 	struct iomap_folio_state *ifs;
 
 	/*
-	 * If there are no bytes pending, this means we are responsible for
+	 * If there are no bytes submitted, this means we are responsible for
 	 * unlocking the folio here, since no IO helper has taken ownership of
 	 * it.
 	 */
-	if (!bytes_pending) {
+	if (!bytes_submitted) {
 		folio_unlock(folio);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -381,10 +381,11 @@ static void iomap_read_end(struct folio *folio, size_t bytes_pending)
 	ifs = folio->private;
 	if (ifs) {
 		bool end_read, uptodate;
-		size_t bytes_accounted = folio_size(folio) - bytes_pending;
+		size_t bytes_not_submitted = folio_size(folio) -
+				bytes_submitted;
 
 		spin_lock_irq(&ifs->state_lock);
-		ifs->read_bytes_pending -= bytes_accounted;
+		ifs->read_bytes_pending -= bytes_not_submitted;
 		/*
 		 * If !ifs->read_bytes_pending, this means all pending reads
 		 * by the IO helper have already completed, which means we need
@@ -401,7 +402,7 @@ static void iomap_read_end(struct folio *folio, size_t bytes_pending)
 }
 
 static int iomap_read_folio_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter,
-		struct iomap_read_folio_ctx *ctx, size_t *bytes_pending)
+		struct iomap_read_folio_ctx *ctx, size_t *bytes_submitted)
 {
 	const struct iomap *iomap = &iter->iomap;
 	loff_t pos = iter->pos;
@@ -442,9 +443,9 @@ static int iomap_read_folio_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter,
 			folio_zero_range(folio, poff, plen);
 			iomap_set_range_uptodate(folio, poff, plen);
 		} else {
-			if (!*bytes_pending)
+			if (!*bytes_submitted)
 				iomap_read_init(folio);
-			*bytes_pending += plen;
+			*bytes_submitted += plen;
 			ret = ctx->ops->read_folio_range(iter, ctx, plen);
 			if (ret)
 				return ret;
@@ -468,39 +469,40 @@ void iomap_read_folio(const struct iomap_ops *ops,
 		.pos		= folio_pos(folio),
 		.len		= folio_size(folio),
 	};
-	size_t bytes_pending = 0;
+	size_t bytes_submitted = 0;
 	int ret;
 
 	trace_iomap_readpage(iter.inode, 1);
 
 	while ((ret = iomap_iter(&iter, ops)) > 0)
-		iter.status = iomap_read_folio_iter(&iter, ctx, &bytes_pending);
+		iter.status = iomap_read_folio_iter(&iter, ctx,
+				&bytes_submitted);
 
 	if (ctx->ops->submit_read)
 		ctx->ops->submit_read(ctx);
 
-	iomap_read_end(folio, bytes_pending);
+	iomap_read_end(folio, bytes_submitted);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iomap_read_folio);
 
 static int iomap_readahead_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter,
-		struct iomap_read_folio_ctx *ctx, size_t *cur_bytes_pending)
+		struct iomap_read_folio_ctx *ctx, size_t *cur_bytes_submitted)
 {
 	int ret;
 
 	while (iomap_length(iter)) {
 		if (ctx->cur_folio &&
 		    offset_in_folio(ctx->cur_folio, iter->pos) == 0) {
-			iomap_read_end(ctx->cur_folio, *cur_bytes_pending);
+			iomap_read_end(ctx->cur_folio, *cur_bytes_submitted);
 			ctx->cur_folio = NULL;
 		}
 		if (!ctx->cur_folio) {
 			ctx->cur_folio = readahead_folio(ctx->rac);
 			if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ctx->cur_folio))
 				return -EINVAL;
-			*cur_bytes_pending = 0;
+			*cur_bytes_submitted = 0;
 		}
-		ret = iomap_read_folio_iter(iter, ctx, cur_bytes_pending);
+		ret = iomap_read_folio_iter(iter, ctx, cur_bytes_submitted);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 	}
@@ -532,19 +534,19 @@ void iomap_readahead(const struct iomap_ops *ops,
 		.pos	= readahead_pos(rac),
 		.len	= readahead_length(rac),
 	};
-	size_t cur_bytes_pending;
+	size_t cur_bytes_submitted;
 
 	trace_iomap_readahead(rac->mapping->host, readahead_count(rac));
 
 	while (iomap_iter(&iter, ops) > 0)
 		iter.status = iomap_readahead_iter(&iter, ctx,
-					&cur_bytes_pending);
+					&cur_bytes_submitted);
 
 	if (ctx->ops->submit_read)
 		ctx->ops->submit_read(ctx);
 
 	if (ctx->cur_folio)
-		iomap_read_end(ctx->cur_folio, cur_bytes_pending);
+		iomap_read_end(ctx->cur_folio, cur_bytes_submitted);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iomap_readahead);
 
-- 
2.47.3

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iomap: rename bytes_pending/bytes_accounted to bytes_submitted/bytes_not_submitted

[Darrick J. Wong]

On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 11:11:32AM -0700, Joanne Koong wrote:
> As mentioned by Brian in [1], the naming "bytes_pending" and
> "bytes_accounting" may be confusing and could be better named. Rename
> this to "bytes_submitted" and "bytes_not_submitted" to make it more
> clear that these are bytes we passed to the IO helper to read in.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/aPuz4Uop66-jRpN-@bfoster/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>

Looks fine to me, though it's gonna be hard for me to figure out what's
going on in patch 2 because first I have to go find this 6.19 iomap
branch that everyone's talking about...

Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>

--D

> ---
>  fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> index 72196e5021b1..4c0d66612a67 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> @@ -364,16 +364,16 @@ static void iomap_read_init(struct folio *folio)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static void iomap_read_end(struct folio *folio, size_t bytes_pending)
> +static void iomap_read_end(struct folio *folio, size_t bytes_submitted)
>  {
>  	struct iomap_folio_state *ifs;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * If there are no bytes pending, this means we are responsible for
> +	 * If there are no bytes submitted, this means we are responsible for
>  	 * unlocking the folio here, since no IO helper has taken ownership of
>  	 * it.
>  	 */
> -	if (!bytes_pending) {
> +	if (!bytes_submitted) {
>  		folio_unlock(folio);
>  		return;
>  	}
> @@ -381,10 +381,11 @@ static void iomap_read_end(struct folio *folio, size_t bytes_pending)
>  	ifs = folio->private;
>  	if (ifs) {
>  		bool end_read, uptodate;
> -		size_t bytes_accounted = folio_size(folio) - bytes_pending;
> +		size_t bytes_not_submitted = folio_size(folio) -
> +				bytes_submitted;
>  
>  		spin_lock_irq(&ifs->state_lock);
> -		ifs->read_bytes_pending -= bytes_accounted;
> +		ifs->read_bytes_pending -= bytes_not_submitted;
>  		/*
>  		 * If !ifs->read_bytes_pending, this means all pending reads
>  		 * by the IO helper have already completed, which means we need
> @@ -401,7 +402,7 @@ static void iomap_read_end(struct folio *folio, size_t bytes_pending)
>  }
>  
>  static int iomap_read_folio_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter,
> -		struct iomap_read_folio_ctx *ctx, size_t *bytes_pending)
> +		struct iomap_read_folio_ctx *ctx, size_t *bytes_submitted)
>  {
>  	const struct iomap *iomap = &iter->iomap;
>  	loff_t pos = iter->pos;
> @@ -442,9 +443,9 @@ static int iomap_read_folio_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter,
>  			folio_zero_range(folio, poff, plen);
>  			iomap_set_range_uptodate(folio, poff, plen);
>  		} else {
> -			if (!*bytes_pending)
> +			if (!*bytes_submitted)
>  				iomap_read_init(folio);
> -			*bytes_pending += plen;
> +			*bytes_submitted += plen;
>  			ret = ctx->ops->read_folio_range(iter, ctx, plen);
>  			if (ret)
>  				return ret;
> @@ -468,39 +469,40 @@ void iomap_read_folio(const struct iomap_ops *ops,
>  		.pos		= folio_pos(folio),
>  		.len		= folio_size(folio),
>  	};
> -	size_t bytes_pending = 0;
> +	size_t bytes_submitted = 0;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	trace_iomap_readpage(iter.inode, 1);
>  
>  	while ((ret = iomap_iter(&iter, ops)) > 0)
> -		iter.status = iomap_read_folio_iter(&iter, ctx, &bytes_pending);
> +		iter.status = iomap_read_folio_iter(&iter, ctx,
> +				&bytes_submitted);
>  
>  	if (ctx->ops->submit_read)
>  		ctx->ops->submit_read(ctx);
>  
> -	iomap_read_end(folio, bytes_pending);
> +	iomap_read_end(folio, bytes_submitted);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iomap_read_folio);
>  
>  static int iomap_readahead_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter,
> -		struct iomap_read_folio_ctx *ctx, size_t *cur_bytes_pending)
> +		struct iomap_read_folio_ctx *ctx, size_t *cur_bytes_submitted)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	while (iomap_length(iter)) {
>  		if (ctx->cur_folio &&
>  		    offset_in_folio(ctx->cur_folio, iter->pos) == 0) {
> -			iomap_read_end(ctx->cur_folio, *cur_bytes_pending);
> +			iomap_read_end(ctx->cur_folio, *cur_bytes_submitted);
>  			ctx->cur_folio = NULL;
>  		}
>  		if (!ctx->cur_folio) {
>  			ctx->cur_folio = readahead_folio(ctx->rac);
>  			if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ctx->cur_folio))
>  				return -EINVAL;
> -			*cur_bytes_pending = 0;
> +			*cur_bytes_submitted = 0;
>  		}
> -		ret = iomap_read_folio_iter(iter, ctx, cur_bytes_pending);
> +		ret = iomap_read_folio_iter(iter, ctx, cur_bytes_submitted);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
>  	}
> @@ -532,19 +534,19 @@ void iomap_readahead(const struct iomap_ops *ops,
>  		.pos	= readahead_pos(rac),
>  		.len	= readahead_length(rac),
>  	};
> -	size_t cur_bytes_pending;
> +	size_t cur_bytes_submitted;
>  
>  	trace_iomap_readahead(rac->mapping->host, readahead_count(rac));
>  
>  	while (iomap_iter(&iter, ops) > 0)
>  		iter.status = iomap_readahead_iter(&iter, ctx,
> -					&cur_bytes_pending);
> +					&cur_bytes_submitted);
>  
>  	if (ctx->ops->submit_read)
>  		ctx->ops->submit_read(ctx);
>  
>  	if (ctx->cur_folio)
> -		iomap_read_end(ctx->cur_folio, cur_bytes_pending);
> +		iomap_read_end(ctx->cur_folio, cur_bytes_submitted);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iomap_readahead);
>  
> -- 
> 2.47.3
> 

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iomap: rename bytes_pending/bytes_accounted to bytes_submitted/bytes_not_submitted

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 10:56:13PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 11:11:32AM -0700, Joanne Koong wrote:
> > As mentioned by Brian in [1], the naming "bytes_pending" and
> > "bytes_accounting" may be confusing and could be better named. Rename
> > this to "bytes_submitted" and "bytes_not_submitted" to make it more
> > clear that these are bytes we passed to the IO helper to read in.
> > 
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/aPuz4Uop66-jRpN-@bfoster/
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
> 
> Looks fine to me, though it's gonna be hard for me to figure out what's
> going on in patch 2 because first I have to go find this 6.19 iomap
> branch that everyone's talking about...

https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git/log/?h=vfs-6.19.iomap

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iomap: rename bytes_pending/bytes_accounted to bytes_submitted/bytes_not_submitted

[Christoph Hellwig]

Looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

[PATCH v3 2/2] iomap: fix race when reading in all bytes of a folio

[Joanne Koong]

There is a race where if all bytes in a folio need to get read in and
the filesystem finishes reading the bytes in before the call to
iomap_read_end(), then bytes_not_submitted in iomap_read_end() will be 0
and the following "ifs->read_bytes_pending -= bytes_not_submitted" will
also be 0 which will trigger an extra folio_end_read() call. This extra
folio_end_read() unlocks the folio for the 2nd time, which sets the lock
bit on the folio, resulting in a permanent lockup.

Fix this by adding a +1 bias when doing the initialization for
ifs->read_bytes_pending. The bias will be subtracted in
iomap_read_end(). This ensures the folio is locked when
iomap_read_end() is called, even if the IO helper has finished reading
in the entire folio.

Additionally, add some comments to clarify how this logic works.

Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Fixes: 51311f045375 ("iomap: track pending read bytes more optimally")
Reported-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
---
 fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
index 4c0d66612a67..5d6c578338dd 100644
--- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
@@ -358,12 +358,42 @@ static void iomap_read_init(struct folio *folio)
 	if (ifs) {
 		size_t len = folio_size(folio);
 
+		/*
+		 * ifs->read_bytes_pending is used to track how many bytes are
+		 * read in asynchronously by the IO helper. We need to track
+		 * this so that we can know when the IO helper has finished
+		 * reading in all the necessary ranges of the folio and can end
+		 * the read.
+		 *
+		 * Increase ->read_bytes_pending by the folio size to start, and
+		 * add a +1 bias. We'll subtract the bias and any uptodate/zeroed
+		 * ranges that did not require IO in iomap_read_end() after we're
+		 * done processing the folio.
+		 *
+		 * We do this because otherwise, we would have to increment
+		 * ifs->read_bytes_pending every time a range in the folio needs
+		 * to be read in, which can get expensive since the spinlock
+		 * needs to be held whenever modifying ifs->read_bytes_pending.
+		 *
+		 * We add the bias to ensure the folio is still locked when
+		 * iomap_read_end() is called, even if the IO helper has already
+		 * finished reading in the entire folio.
+		 */
 		spin_lock_irq(&ifs->state_lock);
-		ifs->read_bytes_pending += len;
+		ifs->read_bytes_pending += len + 1;
 		spin_unlock_irq(&ifs->state_lock);
 	}
 }
 
+/*
+ * This ends IO if no bytes were submitted to an IO helper.
+ *
+ * Otherwise, this calibrates ifs->read_bytes_pending to represent only the
+ * submitted bytes (see comment in iomap_read_init()). If all bytes submitted
+ * have already been completed by the IO helper, then this will end the read.
+ * Else the IO helper will end the read after all submitted ranges have been
+ * read.
+ */
 static void iomap_read_end(struct folio *folio, size_t bytes_submitted)
 {
 	struct iomap_folio_state *ifs;
@@ -381,7 +411,12 @@ static void iomap_read_end(struct folio *folio, size_t bytes_submitted)
 	ifs = folio->private;
 	if (ifs) {
 		bool end_read, uptodate;
-		size_t bytes_not_submitted = folio_size(folio) -
+		/*
+		 * Subtract any bytes that were initially accounted to
+		 * read_bytes_pending but skipped for IO.
+		 * The +1 accounts for the bias we added in iomap_read_init().
+		 */
+		size_t bytes_not_submitted = folio_size(folio) + 1 -
 				bytes_submitted;
 
 		spin_lock_irq(&ifs->state_lock);
-- 
2.47.3

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] iomap: fix race when reading in all bytes of a folio

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 11:11:33AM -0700, Joanne Koong wrote:
> +		 * add a +1 bias. We'll subtract the bias and any uptodate/zeroed
> +		 * ranges that did not require IO in iomap_read_end() after we're

Two overly long lines here.

Otherwise this looks good.

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] iomap: fix race when reading in all bytes of a folio

[Joanne Koong]

On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 1:38 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 11:11:33AM -0700, Joanne Koong wrote:
> > +              * add a +1 bias. We'll subtract the bias and any uptodate/zeroed
> > +              * ranges that did not require IO in iomap_read_end() after we're
>
> Two overly long lines here.
>
> Otherwise this looks good.

I will fix these two lines.

Thanks,
Joanne

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] vfs-6.19.iomap commit 51311f045375 fixups

[Christian Brauner]

On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 11:11:31AM -0700, Joanne Koong wrote:
> These are two fixups for commit 51311f045375 ("iomap: track pending read
> bytes more optimally") in the vfs-6.19.iomap branch. It would be great
> if these could get folded into that original commit, if possible.

It's possible. However, your rename patch will mean that it'll cascade a
bunch of merge conflicts for following patches in your earlier series.
IOW, that can't be cleanly folded.

So really the race fix should go first and be folded into 51311f045375
and I think that can be done without causing a bunch of conflicts.

The rename patch can go on top of what's in vfs-6.19.iomap as that's
really not fixing a bug as in "breaks something" but a cleanup.

Let me know if that works.

> 
> The fix for the race was locally tested by running generic/051 in a loop on an
> xfs filesystem with 1k block size, as reported by Brian in [1].
> 
> Thanks,
> Joanne
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20250926002609.1302233-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/T/#t 
> 
> Changelog:
> v2 -> v3:
> Fix the race by adding a bias instead of returning from iomap_read_end() early.
> 
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20251027181245.2657535-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20251024215008.3844068-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/#t
> 
> Joanne Koong (2):
>   iomap: rename bytes_pending/bytes_accounted to
>     bytes_submitted/bytes_not_submitted
>   iomap: fix race when reading in all bytes of a folio
> 
>  fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.47.3
> 

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] vfs-6.19.iomap commit 51311f045375 fixups

[Joanne Koong]

On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 5:39 AM Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 11:11:31AM -0700, Joanne Koong wrote:
> > These are two fixups for commit 51311f045375 ("iomap: track pending read
> > bytes more optimally") in the vfs-6.19.iomap branch. It would be great
> > if these could get folded into that original commit, if possible.
>
> It's possible. However, your rename patch will mean that it'll cascade a
> bunch of merge conflicts for following patches in your earlier series.
> IOW, that can't be cleanly folded.
>
> So really the race fix should go first and be folded into 51311f045375
> and I think that can be done without causing a bunch of conflicts.
>
> The rename patch can go on top of what's in vfs-6.19.iomap as that's
> really not fixing a bug as in "breaks something" but a cleanup.
>
> Let me know if that works.

That sounds great. I'll resubmit the race fix as a single patch, and
have the rename patch be part of the other iomap changes series [1]
which will be based on top of the branch.

Thanks,
Joanne

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20251021164353.3854086-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/

>
> >
> > The fix for the race was locally tested by running generic/051 in a loop on an
> > xfs filesystem with 1k block size, as reported by Brian in [1].
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Joanne
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20250926002609.1302233-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/T/#t
> >
> > Changelog:
> > v2 -> v3:
> > Fix the race by adding a bias instead of returning from iomap_read_end() early.
> >
> > v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20251027181245.2657535-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/
> > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20251024215008.3844068-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/#t
> >
> > Joanne Koong (2):
> >   iomap: rename bytes_pending/bytes_accounted to
> >     bytes_submitted/bytes_not_submitted
> >   iomap: fix race when reading in all bytes of a folio
> >
> >  fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >  1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.47.3
> >