From: asmadeus@codewreck.org
To: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
Cc: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@kernel.org>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>,
Chris Arges <carges@cloudflare.com>,
v9fs@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 9p/virtio: restrict page pinning to user_backed_iter() iovec
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 08:14:58 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aUSK8vrhPLAGdQlv@codewreck.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8622834.T7Z3S40VBb@weasel>
Christian Schoenebeck wrote on Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 04:14:45PM +0100:
> > Won't be the first time I can't reproduce, but what kind of workload are
> > you testing?
> > Anything that might help me try to reproduce (like VM cpu count/memory)
> > will be appreciated, corruptions are Bad...
>
> Debian Trixie guest running as 9p rootfs in QEMU, 4 cores, 16 GB.
>
> Compiling a bunch of projects with GCC works fine without errors, but with
> clang it's very simple for me to reproduce. E.g. just a very short C++ file
> that pulls in some system headers:
>
> #include <utility>
> #include <sys/cdefs.h>
> #include <limits>
>
> Then running 3 times: clang++ -c foo.cpp -std=c++17
>
> The first 2 clang runs succeed, the 3rd clang run then always blows up for
> anything else than cache=none, various spurious clang errors on those system
> headers like
Thanks, I can't reproduce with this example, but building linux with
`make LLVM=1` does blow up on debian... even with cache=none actually?
I couldn't reproduce running the same rootfs directory in a container so
I don't think I corrupted my image, it appears to be reading junk? short
reads perhaps?...
(Interestingly, it doesn't seem to blow up on an alpine rootfs, I wonder
what's different...)
I'm now getting late for work but at least there's something I can
reproduce, I'll have a closer look ASAP, thank you.
--
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-18 23:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-09 21:04 [PATCH] 9p/virtio: restrict page pinning to user_backed_iter() iovec Dominique Martinet via B4 Relay
2025-12-10 4:21 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-12-10 6:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 7:38 ` asmadeus
2025-12-10 8:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-13 13:28 ` asmadeus
2025-12-15 5:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-15 7:34 ` Dominique Martinet
2025-12-15 11:16 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2025-12-15 14:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-19 12:03 ` David Howells
2025-12-19 12:00 ` David Howells
2025-12-19 11:26 ` David Howells
2025-12-10 13:33 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2025-12-17 13:41 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2025-12-17 21:49 ` asmadeus
2025-12-18 14:21 ` asmadeus
2025-12-18 15:14 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2025-12-18 23:14 ` asmadeus [this message]
2025-12-19 4:09 ` 9p read corruption of mmaped content (Was: [PATCH] 9p/virtio: restrict page pinning to user_backed_iter() iovec) Dominique Martinet
2025-12-19 11:53 ` Dominique Martinet
2025-12-19 13:46 ` Dominique Martinet
2025-12-19 14:01 ` David Howells
2025-12-19 12:06 ` [PATCH] 9p/virtio: restrict page pinning to user_backed_iter() iovec David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aUSK8vrhPLAGdQlv@codewreck.org \
--to=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=carges@cloudflare.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ericvh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
--cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
--cc=v9fs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).