Linux filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Joanne Chang <joannechien@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Zorro Lang <zlang@kernel.org>,
	fstests@vger.kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] generic/735: disable for f2fs
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 03:10:18 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aUUymqMO4RfK8thK@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACQK4XCmq2_nSJA7jLz+TWiTgyZpVwnZZmG-NbNOkB2JjrCSeA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 04:53:04PM +0800, Joanne Chang wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. To clarify, I meant testing the architectural
> limit of blocks per file, not the current free blocks. Sorry for any
> confusion in my previous reply.
> 
> The limit is indeed the maximum file size. However, since both the F2FS
> file size limit and the test's requirements are calculated as
> (block_number * block_size), I believe it is simpler to just test the
> block number.

Well, for the file size you can test by doing a truncate to the expected
size and _notrun if not supported.  I can't really think of a way that
easy to directly check for the number of supported blocks.


  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-19 11:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20251218071717.2573035-1-joannechien@google.com>
     [not found] ` <aUOuMmZnw3tij2nj@infradead.org>
     [not found]   ` <CACQK4XDtWzoco7WgmF81dEYpF1rP3s+3AjemPL40ysojMztOtQ@mail.gmail.com>
2025-12-19  5:30     ` [PATCH v1] generic/735: disable for f2fs Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-19  8:53       ` Joanne Chang
2025-12-19 11:10         ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-12-22  2:48           ` Joanne Chang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aUUymqMO4RfK8thK@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=joannechien@google.com \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zlang@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox