linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
Cc: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@kernel.org>,
	Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>,
	Chris Arges <carges@cloudflare.com>,
	v9fs@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 9p read corruption of mmaped content (Was: [PATCH] 9p/virtio: restrict page pinning to user_backed_iter() iovec)
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 22:46:11 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aUVXI5wt9jm9x66E@codewreck.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aUU8thEsa0X4YrlF@codewreck.org>

David pointing this out on IRC (thanks!)
> you may have actually caught the bug in your trace
>    kworker/u16:2-233     [002] .....  3031.183459: netfs_folio: i=157f3 ix=00005-00005 read-unlock
> ...
>            clang-318     [002] .....  3031.183462: netfs_sreq: R=00001b55[2] ZERO SUBMT f=000 
> s=5fb2 0/4e s=0 e=0
> we shouldn't have unlocked page 5 yet
> we still have to clear the tail of the page

And indeed, if I update the read_collect code to not unlock as soon as
we've read i_size but wait for the tail to be cleared as follow, I can't
reproduce anymore:
---------
diff --git a/fs/netfs/read_collect.c b/fs/netfs/read_collect.c
index a95e7aadafd0..7a0ffa675fb1 100644
--- a/fs/netfs/read_collect.c
+++ b/fs/netfs/read_collect.c
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static void netfs_read_unlock_folios(struct netfs_io_request *rreq,
 		rreq->front_folio_order = order;
 		fsize = PAGE_SIZE << order;
 		fpos = folio_pos(folio);
-		fend = umin(fpos + fsize, rreq->i_size);
+		fend = fpos + fsize;
 
 		trace_netfs_collect_folio(rreq, folio, fend, collected_to);
--------- 

It's too late for me to think of the implications and consider this
diff's correctness, but with that patch the kernel is happily building
with LLVM=1, so I'm fairly confident this particular bug goes away...

(Now that umin() dates back v6.14-rc1 (commit e2d46f2ec332 ("netfs:
Change the read result collector to only use one work item")), I guess
I'll want to check if it's been broken this long next, or if it's a side
effect of another change... Tomorrow...)

I'm off to bed, feel free to send a patch with the above if you think
it's correct
-- 
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus

  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-19 13:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-09 21:04 [PATCH] 9p/virtio: restrict page pinning to user_backed_iter() iovec Dominique Martinet via B4 Relay
2025-12-10  4:21 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-12-10  6:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10  7:38   ` asmadeus
2025-12-10  8:32     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-13 13:28       ` asmadeus
2025-12-15  5:55         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-15  7:34           ` Dominique Martinet
2025-12-15 11:16             ` Christian Schoenebeck
2025-12-15 14:37             ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-19 12:03             ` David Howells
2025-12-19 12:00           ` David Howells
2025-12-19 11:26         ` David Howells
2025-12-10 13:33   ` Christian Schoenebeck
2025-12-17 13:41 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2025-12-17 21:49   ` asmadeus
2025-12-18 14:21     ` asmadeus
2025-12-18 15:14       ` Christian Schoenebeck
2025-12-18 23:14         ` asmadeus
2025-12-19  4:09           ` 9p read corruption of mmaped content (Was: [PATCH] 9p/virtio: restrict page pinning to user_backed_iter() iovec) Dominique Martinet
2025-12-19 11:53             ` Dominique Martinet
2025-12-19 13:46               ` Dominique Martinet [this message]
2025-12-19 14:01             ` David Howells
2025-12-19 12:06   ` [PATCH] 9p/virtio: restrict page pinning to user_backed_iter() iovec David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aUVXI5wt9jm9x66E@codewreck.org \
    --to=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
    --cc=carges@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=ericvh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
    --cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
    --cc=v9fs@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).