From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6734B3F23CF; Tue, 20 Jan 2026 10:55:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768906524; cv=none; b=sn8X6qp+D5yzgGKtdz+TDuCp5SacKMNsjZWI5H+CR4i1R6gjgK6b6Auozl90H3tbxjIxLcRKuxjCH1ERczIsOV5hNzgEP3CkXkG+p5a8p7fMBMEiaQxGINyb55jrYPN7F5CP1Yo+HS+hIO93rnXGvFarKZmsS9p+ohs9BWD0fss= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768906524; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6+pPwXHlFX1BGBFJH8uIIbTzaPO8Ld5/hGZ0KRmVdbU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=gkYIadrBKXDQzAPXmz3XgPUwt4LC03tyhwVZx+64NiBu3eU5yPp81XNCo9sTtMeNbr9rIMUcPPSc02y4mDGfED92Mv+exB7qxG2uY3d1Zxu8zf3epTHQzFTwAb4d2mb83QVrCwsFRNdVtS1Q/LSMt78MedcTN8rdh8gDagCxzfI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAAE31476; Tue, 20 Jan 2026 02:55:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from pluto (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 34F293F740; Tue, 20 Jan 2026 02:55:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 10:55:12 +0000 From: Cristian Marussi To: Dhruva Gole Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Cristian Marussi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, etienne.carriere@st.com, peng.fan@oss.nxp.com, michal.simek@amd.com, dan.carpenter@linaro.org, elif.topuz@arm.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com, philip.radford@arm.com, souvik.chakravarty@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/17] firmware: arm_scmi: Define a common SCMI_MAX_PROTOCOLS value Message-ID: References: <20260114114638.2290765-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> <20260114114638.2290765-2-cristian.marussi@arm.com> <20260119111827.00001704@huawei.com> <20260120064419.by4nvmdgdybwe76q@lcpd911> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260120064419.by4nvmdgdybwe76q@lcpd911> On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 12:14:19PM +0530, Dhruva Gole wrote: > On Jan 19, 2026 at 11:18:27 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 11:46:05 +0000 > > Cristian Marussi wrote: > > > > > Add a common definition of SCMI_MAX_PROTOCOLS and use it all over the > > > SCMI stack. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi > > Hi Cristian, > > > > Mention the introduction of SCMI_PROTOCOL_LAST in the patch description > > and probably say why it takes that value (which is much less than > > the SCMI_MAX_PROTOCOLS value). > > Rather I wonder why even add it? Is it just like a documentation/ marker > or is some other usage even planned for it? It was a cleanup related to some changes that I then dropped from this public series...I kept it since it seemed fine, but I will definitely drop it in V3 since it is no more related or needed by anything in this series. Thanks, Cristian