From: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
To: Remi Pommarel <repk@triplefau.lt>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
v9fs@lists.linux.dev, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@kernel.org>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] 9p: Track 9P RPC waiting time as IO
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 08:20:31 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXFfPweqq25iE-UC@codewreck.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47f0b44f159084f4032a9424e0e2e586b8640a12.1769009696.git.repk@triplefau.lt>
Remi Pommarel wrote on Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 08:21:59PM +0100:
> Use io_wait_event_killable() to ensure that time spent waiting for 9P
> RPC transactions is accounted as IO wait time.
Thanks for splitting this out of your other 9p improvements!
I was about to ask Peter/Ingo which tree this should go through, but
could you also convert the other few wait_event_killable() calls in
net/9p/trans_*.c ?
They're either waiting for other IO to complete (virtio x2) or for the
current IO to complete (virtio/xen), so I think they qualify just as
much.
(the virtio ones will likely conflict with some other rework that's been
dragging on last month, but given the patch is trivial it won't matter
much, you can send as of master)
Thanks,
--
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-21 23:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-21 19:21 [PATCH 0/2] wait/9p: Account 9P RPC waiting time as I/O wait Remi Pommarel
2026-01-21 19:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] wait: Introduce io_wait_event_killable() Remi Pommarel
2026-01-21 19:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-21 19:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] 9p: Track 9P RPC waiting time as IO Remi Pommarel
2026-01-21 23:20 ` Dominique Martinet [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aXFfPweqq25iE-UC@codewreck.org \
--to=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=ericvh@kernel.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=repk@triplefau.lt \
--cc=v9fs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox