From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-dy1-f193.google.com (mail-dy1-f193.google.com [74.125.82.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0A932D77E5 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2026 20:43:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.82.193 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769460209; cv=none; b=gFfc273DU33QCw647KuXUXRdzwX1HGKuKG6CHrPiud/j+EaO5rA4VH93a+nJsn1AdMDgS+DX+85XTQh2PZNkFCK5SUEAS+TdLnUFmF6ZPemw+z9OWtLLjG3/gLbVG8bl0EUdNyRUdxhoCCgFD3qbnAiShkeu+UfiXOfWETxQyYg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769460209; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2ImvZniPDzFetnyqCWbg0zblKqhE8c/sMpTgsU+ZG+Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=V2PyxwHqRM+bQt3IhAib14fiHV5Y8yNR+6EsYttgGsDrsydPeUlAri8F68a6fWmGtLRu9/FXpPYlA9C0YffkDegqIzoC0g7d8RbvXPlkPNiClzcPT8V48Yt0DVYsfzhofL7ISmVeMRIsz4dgAD+Kq2O46+INS7WYLQBjxJAZn5w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc.com header.i=@rivosinc.com header.b=PXJ9VFxS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.82.193 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc.com header.i=@rivosinc.com header.b="PXJ9VFxS" Received: by mail-dy1-f193.google.com with SMTP id 5a478bee46e88-2b70abe3417so11178389eec.0 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2026 12:43:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rivosinc.com; s=google; t=1769460207; x=1770065007; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=s0UipC5QHyJnTmDWXctjUpxhkNyTA6jh9RjXD3Q3T9M=; b=PXJ9VFxSjyN7jT6HpQvw3Be1870o/akPKIBYteU+9y4pc4JKWkWSlVVZJG9svjhYaO QNQltekxPSEKZz3E8CCa0xhAMOBANuOOR/9BQ7se9cqNTA73kBz6rwlKM3hKE6P3o8jP /2pNwK3HcvKn9B8LBxYSHqfcHaOS/aDi2D0wf2orHCgBR2VymuZRj31zkzLDvv2MTTBI fBk0YnCYiSx2YDhTvdcnPzdGpjep8uf7u/PBeVG76moqqJ+7dkV5G6nBf/UugVGQ21el FGLUeoqcTFBfToCiDMTM5w7Fu+FbZczcDLz51FQymVRGNfcQKrw6r3aMskOgYdoHfwKy 0peQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1769460207; x=1770065007; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=s0UipC5QHyJnTmDWXctjUpxhkNyTA6jh9RjXD3Q3T9M=; b=WNSmq1pK8BKPPgkQweOAuX2EMQwECoFYfFudKca97n7N6nxgTF8EjTl216xvwbYFhW DimkKoBorVI3mYaJ9hEzagLN5d7wT/dHuYDaH4ROcYMC5p6pLCnIyrLW7DB4GYdktdou 7omZaiIT0CddNQDjfSd+F/tIXuqNFvnZLiVOPDF8Fh93Jh5MimjweoUkQElLspWxO2Nq KFWk9+XP/a/6K/bxs/aKj3tfaOA7VVNXUFSFKW4xuFX09aNVeafG+KCYELQCObVpKPs9 PjZjeYhIcFqcFyXhV4KS0yKdDmllFWSinM1EuMg10ypOcqs0HGWX7cJnpC7nti8yUgoh WQYA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUW4y6Ba7E0Wyn5jPx4Vp6CQMrz2hYfLO3S6HQvNB08NZ63b7XbnC2Fg2NalIDfiYHsNxo9m6rEkpXYLckK@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwAEDEyBEY9oP3UacevcMiByyTctZ6+mV0BWMTJG6ULgwuX56y5 CVyHzwx9VyxoIWbbI06Wyda1a9JVUJrPHxosFvQ7soyfLPwH0n8zSJuGmJpVKaG08vQ= X-Gm-Gg: AZuq6aJUjtlSw2+eEzkqi9oghMMjSuqDaEa0ZWDklIAyqiKoicNBk7rqDxaBf+1pVIo zswjjF/d/3o0cvqo580giuYh9OgV5B6ctB+jWxuBxRcA4pmdz+lsv/M077h/gPcqOyWl6tRMSSp Kv5t+CT23siJ4T1d/feB6rE2kbBlnCNj+vHesJ8v5q3S4Et/GXKyP1Wft9css9Oh0GvvuIbwqiB zFPm1ZPWOVv6wJLTzbj8hPnGiqWjDeptTF4S3MPCyaH0vbpJ2KD62Zc2RGhBzpL7vFtXJeaH5ZZ 3zcDyQ7CdIM4FrO2+GxQQ6xalpg6jk1camCpQebXBCodBTSV3AedTI1uHiolp8kpbNC5mYmDRTH q1QX01mdLZyqKuFRUAm20EB4RM2ljlh10VLLSIO4ChqQS68bm9cCCl5pIgeytBIHqNUXBaYbazD QQE7QOjHoEht8+8eO+o00U X-Received: by 2002:a05:7301:d16:b0:2af:7ee:5300 with SMTP id 5a478bee46e88-2b7643466e8mr2954218eec.14.1769460207055; Mon, 26 Jan 2026 12:43:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from debug.ba.rivosinc.com ([64.71.180.162]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5a478bee46e88-2b73aa08964sm14741354eec.28.2026.01.26.12.43.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 26 Jan 2026 12:43:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 12:43:24 -0800 From: Deepak Gupta To: Zong Li Cc: Paul Walmsley , x86@kernel.org, Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Conor Dooley , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Arnd Bergmann , Christian Brauner , Peter Zijlstra , Oleg Nesterov , Eric Biederman , Kees Cook , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Jann Horn , Conor Dooley , Miguel Ojeda , Alex Gaynor , Boqun Feng , Gary Guo , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn?= Roy Baron , Andreas Hindborg , Alice Ryhl , Trevor Gross , Benno Lossin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, alistair.francis@wdc.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org, jim.shu@sifive.com, Andy Chiu , kito.cheng@sifive.com, charlie@rivosinc.com, atishp@rivosinc.com, evan@rivosinc.com, cleger@rivosinc.com, alexghiti@rivosinc.com, samitolvanen@google.com, broonie@kernel.org, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Korb , Valentin Haudiquet , Charles Mirabile , Jesse Huang Subject: Re: [PATCH v26 00/28] riscv control-flow integrity for usermode Message-ID: References: <20251211-v5_user_cfi_series-v26-0-f0f419e81ac0@rivosinc.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 09:32:20AM +0800, Zong Li wrote: >On Thu, Jan 8, 2026 at 11:10 PM Deepak Gupta wrote: >> >> Hi Paul, >> >> I have a bugfix for a bug reported by Jesse Huang (thanks Jesse) in riscv >> implementation of `map_shadow_stack`. >> >> Should I send a new series or only the bugfix-patch for implementation >> of `map_shadow_stack` >> > >Hi Deepak, >Not sure if I missed the bugfix patch, I couldn't find it on the >mailing list. Could I know have you submitted it? If so, could you >please point me where the patch is? >Thanks No you didn't miss anything. I had been busy with job change and even though change was small. I wanted to do some basic testing before sending fix. I just sent the fix on this v26 series, patch #10/28. Sorry about the delay here. > >> Let me know. Thanks. >> >> -Deepak >> >> -Deepak >> >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 12, 2025 at 10:33 AM Deepak Gupta wrote: >> > >> > On Fri, Dec 12, 2025 at 01:30:29AM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote: >> > >On Thu, 11 Dec 2025, Deepak Gupta via B4 Relay wrote: >> > > >> > >> v26: CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI depends on CONFIG_MMU (dependency of shadow stack >> > >> on MMU). Used b4 to pick tags, apparantly it messed up some tag picks. Fixing it >> > > >> > >Deepak: I'm now (at least) the third person to tell you to stop resending >> > >this entire series over and over again. >> > >> > To be very honest I also feel very bad doing and DOSing the lists. Sorry to you >> > and everyone else. >> > >> > But I have been sitting on this patch series for last 3-4 merge windows with >> > patches being exactly same/similar. So I have been a little more than desperate >> > to get it in. >> > >> > I really haven't had any meaningful feedback on patch series except stalling >> > just before each merge window for reasons which really shouldn't stall its >> > merge. Sure that's the nature of open source development and it's maintainer's >> > call at the end of the day. And I am new to this. I'll improve. >> > >> > > >> > >First, a modified version of the CFI v23 series was ALREADY SITTING IN >> > >LINUX-NEXT. So there's no reason you should be resending the entire >> > >series, UNLESS your intention for me is to drop the entire existing series >> > >and wait for another merge window. >> > > >> > >Second: when someone asks you questions about an individual patch, and you >> > >want to answer those questions, it's NOT GOOD for you to resend the entire >> > >28 series as the response! You are DDOSing a bunch of lists and E-mail >> > >inboxes. Just answer the question in a single E-mail. If you want to >> > >update a single patch, just send that one patch. >> > >> > Noted. I wasn't sure about it. I'll explicitly ask next time if you want me to >> > send another one. >> > >> > > >> > >If you don't start paying attention to these rules then people are going >> > >to start ignoring you -- at best! -- and it's going to give the entire >> > >community a bad reputation. >> > >> > Even before this, this patch series has been ignored largely. I don't know >> > how to get attention. All I wanted was either feedback or get it in. And as I >> > said I've been desparate to get it in. Also as I said, I'll improve. >> > >> > > >> > >Please acknowledge that you understand this, >> > >> > ACKed. >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >- Paul