From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DE0632B996 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 19:14:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770750861; cv=none; b=V/BMngrWN0k8ujS521p82OryQQtPmLVdIgt84Fkjy8icnP0NospVVQ2eLL6DpQRHR1SO2KkMDOKP6PHyYdqY6vRk2sem2OtBf0wnhIUpdkjocx2xIdZM0PBpahS8tlgEhcSweL5CtxxGXseaTjiQBGNWpjwPCtiQUoD1ZHKfrro= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770750861; c=relaxed/simple; bh=a2MedpXYJ/WWBxJR4ZubXioWf8I0yl8QMk755YFCpWg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=a5ciLjeXuHQ6AH1/0cntYwJDnNnyROrlLJ0ZGUpcYJCv2TLaAkhWOKtNz54dgVC/MfVW4irkuxtxebe5or9rvxXnd3HIxmPqnLdW271jTOcT0n1O9+kqcO5bci9GCzw1AN5ysx/3+1lUrhuONlPn/sKbkwsGJ9k6ixwDiEgQirU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=KUXXfrcl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="KUXXfrcl" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1770750859; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Dcj/eGMjgm49uADtPlV4T2MT7+Gx/kjw3bCB2opkvMg=; b=KUXXfrclazYzdkh6iYCg4/m1NJ6tctBXezAD/RSJ1p3juY1A4aYynD2AoKGEkjLDBXWlwr H9AkPL+QwsZoqgS+mXgnqFkm3fVOacXjVCnJGISG+vcXH69EmbmIKRlXIGcM6gCpC9QUk8 uucVEJ+pkcB7bzxRD5SC+PxDaoujTFY= Received: from mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-159-h6J-58aiOkKKK2UjE9g4mw-1; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 14:14:17 -0500 X-MC-Unique: h6J-58aiOkKKK2UjE9g4mw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: h6J-58aiOkKKK2UjE9g4mw_1770750857 Received: from mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 043761956095; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 19:14:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bfoster (unknown [10.22.80.28]) by mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ED5119560A3; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 19:14:15 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 14:14:13 -0500 From: Brian Foster To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] iomap, xfs: lift zero range hole mapping flush into xfs Message-ID: References: <20260129155028.141110-1-bfoster@redhat.com> <20260129155028.141110-2-bfoster@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.12 On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 08:15:50AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > This looks sensible to me. I'll add it to my zoned xfs test queue > to make sure it doesn't break anything there, but as the zoned > iomap_begin always allocates new space it should be fine. > > Thanks. As you've probably noticed from looking through the rest of the patches, this one is mainly a lift-and-shift initial step from iomap to xfs. Let me know if anything breaks. Brian