From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] iomap, xfs: lift zero range hole mapping flush into xfs
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 07:36:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aYyiBcTx2IwfZUm2@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aYuDhQj_xw3ByeD5@bfoster>
On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 02:14:13PM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 08:15:50AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > This looks sensible to me. I'll add it to my zoned xfs test queue
> > to make sure it doesn't break anything there, but as the zoned
> > iomap_begin always allocates new space it should be fine.
> >
> >
>
> Thanks. As you've probably noticed from looking through the rest of the
> patches, this one is mainly a lift-and-shift initial step from iomap to
> xfs. Let me know if anything breaks.
Well, to one of the iomap_begin instances. We have an entirely
separate one for zoned mode, and we also fall back to the direct I/O
one when a rtextsize is set. I don't think either of the moved
handling, but I want to be sure.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-11 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-29 15:50 [PATCH v2 0/5] iomap, xfs: improve zero range flushing and lookup Brian Foster
2026-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] iomap, xfs: lift zero range hole mapping flush into xfs Brian Foster
2026-02-10 16:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-10 19:14 ` Brian Foster
2026-02-11 15:36 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-02-13 6:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-13 17:37 ` Brian Foster
2026-03-02 19:02 ` Brian Foster
2026-03-03 14:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-03 19:00 ` Brian Foster
2026-03-04 13:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-04 14:17 ` Brian Foster
2026-03-04 14:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-04 15:02 ` Brian Foster
2026-03-04 17:04 ` Brian Foster
2026-03-05 14:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-05 15:06 ` Brian Foster
2026-03-05 16:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-13 10:20 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2026-02-13 16:24 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-18 17:41 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2026-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] xfs: flush eof folio before insert range size update Brian Foster
2026-02-10 16:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-10 19:14 ` Brian Foster
2026-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] xfs: look up cow fork extent earlier for buffered iomap_begin Brian Foster
2026-02-10 16:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] xfs: only flush when COW fork blocks overlap data fork holes Brian Foster
2026-02-10 16:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-10 19:18 ` Brian Foster
2026-02-17 15:06 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2026-02-18 15:37 ` Brian Foster
2026-02-18 17:40 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2026-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] xfs: replace zero range flush with folio batch Brian Foster
2026-02-10 16:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-10 19:19 ` Brian Foster
2026-02-11 15:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aYyiBcTx2IwfZUm2@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox