public inbox for linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: "Nirjhar Roy (IBM)" <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] xfs: only flush when COW fork blocks overlap data fork holes
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 10:37:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZXc0vyT2zVcRXCp@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37206076c486da01efe90b95f5dc61049cb2d141.camel@gmail.com>

On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 08:36:50PM +0530, Nirjhar Roy (IBM) wrote:
> On Thu, 2026-01-29 at 10:50 -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> > The zero range hole mapping flush case has been lifted from iomap
> > into XFS. Now that we have more mapping context available from the
> > ->iomap_begin() handler, we can isolate the flush further to when we
> > know a hole is fronted by COW blocks.
> > 
> > Rather than purely rely on pagecache dirty state, explicitly check
> > for the case where a range is a hole in both forks. Otherwise trim
> > to the range where there does happen to be overlap and use that for
> > the pagecache writeback check. This might prevent some spurious
> > zeroing, but more importantly makes it easier to remove the flush
> > entirely.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> > index 0edab7af4a10..0e82b4ec8264 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> > @@ -1760,10 +1760,12 @@ xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin(
> >  {
> >  	struct iomap_iter	*iter = container_of(iomap, struct iomap_iter,
> >  						     iomap);
> > +	struct address_space	*mapping = inode->i_mapping;
> >  	struct xfs_inode	*ip = XFS_I(inode);
> >  	struct xfs_mount	*mp = ip->i_mount;
> >  	xfs_fileoff_t		offset_fsb = XFS_B_TO_FSBT(mp, offset);
> >  	xfs_fileoff_t		end_fsb = xfs_iomap_end_fsb(mp, offset, count);
> > +	xfs_fileoff_t		cow_fsb = NULLFILEOFF;
> >  	struct xfs_bmbt_irec	imap, cmap;
> >  	struct xfs_iext_cursor	icur, ccur;
> >  	xfs_fsblock_t		prealloc_blocks = 0;
> > @@ -1831,6 +1833,8 @@ xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin(
> >  		}
> >  		cow_eof = !xfs_iext_lookup_extent(ip, ip->i_cowfp, offset_fsb,
> >  				&ccur, &cmap);
> > +		if (!cow_eof)
> > +			cow_fsb = cmap.br_startoff;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	/* We never need to allocate blocks for unsharing a hole. */
> > @@ -1845,17 +1849,37 @@ xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin(
> >  	 * writeback to remap pending blocks and restart the lookup.
> >  	 */
> >  	if ((flags & IOMAP_ZERO) && imap.br_startoff > offset_fsb) {
> > -		if (filemap_range_needs_writeback(inode->i_mapping, offset,
> > -						  offset + count - 1)) {
> > +		loff_t start, end;
> 
> Nit: Tab between data type and identifier?
> 

Sure.

> > +
> > +		imap.br_blockcount = imap.br_startoff - offset_fsb;
> > +		imap.br_startoff = offset_fsb;
> > +		imap.br_startblock = HOLESTARTBLOCK;
> > +		imap.br_state = XFS_EXT_NORM;
> > +
> > +		if (cow_fsb == NULLFILEOFF) {
> > +			goto found_imap;
> > +		} else if (cow_fsb > offset_fsb) {
> > +			xfs_trim_extent(&imap, offset_fsb,
> > +					cow_fsb - offset_fsb);
> > +			goto found_imap;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		/* COW fork blocks overlap the hole */
> > +		xfs_trim_extent(&imap, offset_fsb,
> > +			    cmap.br_startoff + cmap.br_blockcount - offset_fsb);
> > +		start = XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, imap.br_startoff);
> > +		end = XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp,
> > +				   imap.br_startoff + imap.br_blockcount) - 1;
> 
> So, we are including the bytes in the block number (imap.br_startoff + imap.br_blockcount - 1)th,
> right? That is why a -1 after XFS_FSB_TO_B()? 

Not sure I follow what you mean by the "bytes in the block number"
phrasing..? Anyways, the XFS_FSB_TO_B() here should return the starting
byte offset of the first block beyond the range (exclusive). The -1
changes that to the last byte offset of the range we're interested in
(inclusive), which I believe is what the filemap api wants..

Brian

> --NR
> > +		if (filemap_range_needs_writeback(mapping, start, end)) {
> >  			xfs_iunlock(ip, lockmode);
> > -			error = filemap_write_and_wait_range(inode->i_mapping,
> > -						offset, offset + count - 1);
> > +			error = filemap_write_and_wait_range(mapping, start,
> > +							     end);
> >  			if (error)
> >  				return error;
> >  			goto restart;
> >  		}
> > -		xfs_hole_to_iomap(ip, iomap, offset_fsb, imap.br_startoff);
> > -		goto out_unlock;
> > +
> > +		goto found_imap;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	/*
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-18 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-29 15:50 [PATCH v2 0/5] iomap, xfs: improve zero range flushing and lookup Brian Foster
2026-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] iomap, xfs: lift zero range hole mapping flush into xfs Brian Foster
2026-02-10 16:15   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-10 19:14     ` Brian Foster
2026-02-11 15:36       ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-13  6:06   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-13 17:37     ` Brian Foster
2026-03-02 19:02       ` Brian Foster
2026-03-03 14:37         ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-03 19:00           ` Brian Foster
2026-03-04 13:13             ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-04 14:17               ` Brian Foster
2026-03-04 14:41                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-04 15:02                   ` Brian Foster
2026-03-04 17:04                     ` Brian Foster
2026-03-05 14:11                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-05 15:06                         ` Brian Foster
2026-03-05 16:10                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-13 10:20   ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2026-02-13 16:24     ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-18 17:41       ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2026-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] xfs: flush eof folio before insert range size update Brian Foster
2026-02-10 16:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-10 19:14     ` Brian Foster
2026-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] xfs: look up cow fork extent earlier for buffered iomap_begin Brian Foster
2026-02-10 16:17   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] xfs: only flush when COW fork blocks overlap data fork holes Brian Foster
2026-02-10 16:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-10 19:18     ` Brian Foster
2026-02-17 15:06   ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2026-02-18 15:37     ` Brian Foster [this message]
2026-02-18 17:40       ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2026-01-29 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] xfs: replace zero range flush with folio batch Brian Foster
2026-02-10 16:21   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-10 19:19     ` Brian Foster
2026-02-11 15:41       ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aZXc0vyT2zVcRXCp@bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox