From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
To: "Andreas Grünbacher" <andreas.gruenbacher@gmail.com>,
"Gao Xiang" <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
<linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux FS-devel Mailing List" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
<chao@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] iomap: introduce IOMAP_TAIL
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 18:07:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa64b0cf-94e8-aa23-9271-66c7b506abc2@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHpGcMK4ihE1nv7ME0yKKUdBj+Rdr9nBMnxAtQfFFOmK9aEY_A@mail.gmail.com>
On 2019/7/1 17:49, Andreas Grünbacher wrote:
> Am Mo., 1. Juli 2019 um 10:04 Uhr schrieb Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>:
>> On 2019/7/1 14:40, Chao Yu wrote:
>>> Hi Xiang,
>>>
>>> On 2019/6/29 17:34, Gao Xiang wrote:
>>>> Hi Chao,
>>>>
>>>> On 2019/6/29 15:30, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>>> Some filesystems like erofs/reiserfs have the ability to pack tail
>>>>> data into metadata, however iomap framework can only support mapping
>>>>> inline data with IOMAP_INLINE type, it restricts that:
>>>>> - inline data should be locating at page #0.
>>>>> - inline size should equal to .i_size
>>>>> So we can not use IOMAP_INLINE to handle tail-packing case.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch introduces new mapping type IOMAP_TAIL to map tail-packed
>>>>> data for further use of erofs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> fs/iomap.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> include/linux/iomap.h | 1 +
>>>>> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/fs/iomap.c b/fs/iomap.c
>>>>> index 12654c2e78f8..ae7777ce77d0 100644
>>>>> --- a/fs/iomap.c
>>>>> +++ b/fs/iomap.c
>>>>> @@ -280,6 +280,23 @@ iomap_read_inline_data(struct inode *inode, struct page *page,
>>>>> SetPageUptodate(page);
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> +static void
>>>>> +iomap_read_tail_data(struct inode *inode, struct page *page,
>>>>> + struct iomap *iomap)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + size_t size = i_size_read(inode) & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
>>>>> + void *addr;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (PageUptodate(page))
>>>>> + return;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + addr = kmap_atomic(page);
>>>>> + memcpy(addr, iomap->inline_data, size);
>>>>> + memset(addr + size, 0, PAGE_SIZE - size);
>>>>
>>>> need flush_dcache_page(page) here for new page cache page since
>>>> it's generic iomap code (althrough not necessary for x86, arm), I am not sure...
>>>> see commit d2b2c6dd227b and c01778001a4f...
>>>
>>> Thanks for your reminding, these all codes were copied from
>>> iomap_read_inline_data(), so I think we need a separated patch to fix this issue
>>> if necessary.
>>
>> Yes, just a reminder, it is good as it-is.
>
> Not sure if that means that IOMAP_INLINE as is works for you now. In
> any case, if the inline data isn't transparently copied into the page
> cache at index 0, memory-mapped I/O isn't going to work.
>
> The code further assumes that "packed" files consist of exactly one
> IOMAP_INLINE mapping; no IOMAP_MAPPED or other mappings may follow. Is
> it that assumption that's causing you trouble? If so, what's the
Yes, that's the problem we met.
> layout at the filesystem level you want to support?
The layout which can support tail-merge one, it means if the data locating at
the tail of file has small enough size, we can inline the tail data into
metadata area. e.g.:
IOMAP_MAPPED [0, 8192]
IOMAP_INLINE (or maybe IOMAP_TAIL) [8192, 8200]
Thanks,
>
> Thanks,
> Andreas
>
>> Thanks,
>> Gao Xiang
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Gao Xiang
>>>>
>>>>> + kunmap_atomic(addr);
>>>>> + SetPageUptodate(page);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> static loff_t
>>>>> iomap_readpage_actor(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t length, void *data,
>>>>> struct iomap *iomap)
>>>>> @@ -298,6 +315,11 @@ iomap_readpage_actor(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t length, void *data,
>>>>> return PAGE_SIZE;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> + if (iomap->type == IOMAP_TAIL) {
>>>>> + iomap_read_tail_data(inode, page, iomap);
>>>>> + return PAGE_SIZE;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> /* zero post-eof blocks as the page may be mapped */
>>>>> iomap_adjust_read_range(inode, iop, &pos, length, &poff, &plen);
>>>>> if (plen == 0)
>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/iomap.h b/include/linux/iomap.h
>>>>> index 2103b94cb1bf..7e1ee48e3db7 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/linux/iomap.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/iomap.h
>>>>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ struct vm_fault;
>>>>> #define IOMAP_MAPPED 0x03 /* blocks allocated at @addr */
>>>>> #define IOMAP_UNWRITTEN 0x04 /* blocks allocated at @addr in unwritten state */
>>>>> #define IOMAP_INLINE 0x05 /* data inline in the inode */
>>>>> +#define IOMAP_TAIL 0x06 /* tail data packed in metdata */
>>>>>
>>>>> /*
>>>>> * Flags for all iomap mappings:
>>>>>
>>>> .
>>>>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-01 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-29 7:30 [PATCH RFC] iomap: introduce IOMAP_TAIL Chao Yu
2019-06-29 9:34 ` Gao Xiang
2019-07-01 6:40 ` Chao Yu
2019-07-01 7:03 ` Gao Xiang
2019-07-01 9:49 ` Andreas Grünbacher
2019-07-01 10:07 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2019-07-01 10:13 ` Andreas Grünbacher
2019-07-01 10:22 ` Chao Yu
2019-06-30 23:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-07-01 6:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-01 7:38 ` Chao Yu
2019-07-01 7:28 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aa64b0cf-94e8-aa23-9271-66c7b506abc2@huawei.com \
--to=yuchao0@huawei.com \
--cc=andreas.gruenbacher@gmail.com \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=gaoxiang25@huawei.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).