Re: [RFC PATCH 02/24] erofs: add superblock data structure in Rust

[Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>]

Hi Greg,

On 2024/9/17 01:55, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 09:56:12PM +0800, Yiyang Wu wrote:
>> diff --git a/fs/erofs/rust/erofs_sys.rs b/fs/erofs/rust/erofs_sys.rs
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..0f1400175fc2
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/fs/erofs/rust/erofs_sys.rs
>> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
>> +#![allow(dead_code)]
>> +// Copyright 2024 Yiyang Wu
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT or GPL-2.0-or-later
> 
> Sorry, but I have to ask, why a dual license here?  You are only linking
> to GPL-2.0-only code, so why the different license?  Especially if you
> used the GPL-2.0-only code to "translate" from.
> 
> If you REALLY REALLY want to use a dual license, please get your
> lawyers to document why this is needed and put it in the changelog for
> the next time you submit this series when adding files with dual
> licenses so I don't have to ask again :)

As a new Rust kernel developper, Yiyang is working on EROFS Rust
userspace implementation too.

I think he just would like to share the common Rust logic between
kernel and userspace.  Since for the userspace side, Apache-2.0
or even MIT is more friendly for 3rd applications (especially
cloud-native applications). So the dual license is proposed here,
if you don't have strong opinion, I will ask Yiyang document this
in the next version.  Or we're fine to drop MIT too.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h